if we do SHL of two 16-bit ranges like [0, 30000) with [1,2) we get
"full-set" instead of what I would have expected [0, 60000) which is
still in the 16-bit unsigned range.
This patch changes the SHL algorithm to allow getting a usable range
even in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57983
llvm-svn: 357854
Add a test that checks the intersectWith() implementation against
all 4-bit range pairs. The test uses a more explicit way of
calculating the possible intersections, and checks that the right
one is picked out according to the smallest set heuristic.
This is in preparation for introducing intersectWith() variants that
use different heuristics to pick an intersection range, if there are
multiple possibilities.
llvm-svn: 357119
Split off from D59749. This adds isWrappedSet() and
isUpperSignWrapped() set with the same behavior as isSignWrappedSet()
and isUpperWrapped() for the respectively other domain.
The methods isWrappedSet() and isSignWrappedSet() will not consider
ranges of the form [X, Max] == [X, 0) and [X, SignedMax] == [X, SignedMin)
to be wrapping, while isUpperWrapped() and isUpperSignWrapped() will.
Also replace the checks in getUnsignedMin() and friends with method
calls that implement the same logic.
llvm-svn: 357112
Split out from D59749. The current implementation of isWrappedSet()
doesn't do what it says on the tin, and treats ranges like
[X, Max] as wrapping, because they are represented as [X, 0) when
using half-inclusive ranges. This also makes it inconsistent with
the semantics of isSignWrappedSet().
This patch renames isWrappedSet() to isUpperWrapped(), in preparation
for the introduction of a new isWrappedSet() method with corrected
behavior.
llvm-svn: 357107
Split off from D59749. This uses a simpler and more efficient
implementation of isSignWrappedSet(), and considers full sets
as non-wrapped, to be consistent with isWrappedSet(). Otherwise
the behavior is unchanged.
There are currently only two users of this function and both already
check for isFullSet() || isSignWrappedSet(), so this is not going to
cause a change in overall behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59848
llvm-svn: 357039
This adds ConstantRange::getFull(BitWidth) and
ConstantRange::getEmpty(BitWidth) named constructors as more readable
alternatives to the current ConstantRange(BitWidth, /* full */ false)
and similar. Additionally private getFull() and getEmpty() member
functions are added which return a full/empty range with the same bit
width -- these are commonly needed inside ConstantRange.cpp.
The IsFullSet argument in the ConstantRange(BitWidth, IsFullSet)
constructor is now mandatory for the few usages that still make use of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59716
llvm-svn: 356852
Following the suggestion in D59450, I'm moving the code for constructing
a ConstantRange from KnownBits out of ValueTracking, which also allows us
to test this code independently.
I'm adding this method to ConstantRange rather than KnownBits (which
would have been a bit nicer API wise) to avoid creating a dependency
from Support to IR, where ConstantRange lives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59475
llvm-svn: 356339
Add functions to ConstantRange that determine whether the
unsigned/signed addition/subtraction of two ConstantRanges
may/always/never overflows. This will allow checking overflow
conditions based on known constant ranges in addition to known bits.
I'm implementing these methods on ConstantRange to allow them to be
unit tested independently of any ValueTracking machinery. The tests
include exhaustive testing on 4-bit ranges, to make sure the result
is both conservatively correct and maximally precise.
The OverflowResult enum is redeclared on ConstantRange, because
I wanted to avoid a dependency in either direction between
ValueTracking.h and ConstantRange.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59193
llvm-svn: 356276
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: This is trying to add support for r334428.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, hiraditya, bixia, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48399
llvm-svn: 335646
Extend the ConstantRange implementation to compute the range of possible values resulting from an arithmetic right shift operation.
There will be a follow up patch to leverage this constant range infrastructure in LazyValueInfo.
Patch by Surya Kumari Jangala!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40881
llvm-svn: 320976
Previously ConstantRange::makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion only handled addition. This adds support for subtraction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40036
llvm-svn: 319806
r271020 added an early out to skip the signed multiply portion of ConstantRange::multiply. The comment says we don't need to do signed multiply if the range is only positive numbers, but the implemented check only ensures that the start of the range is positive. It doesn't look at the end of the range.
This patch checks the end of the range instead. Because Upper is one more than the end we have to see if its positive or if its one past the last positive number.
llvm-svn: 302717
This change teaches getEquivalentICmp to be smarter about generating
ICMP_NE and ICMP_EQ predicates.
An earlier version of this change was landed as rL283057 which had a
use-after-free bug. This new version has a fix for that bug, and a (C++
unittests/) test case that would have triggered it rL283057.
llvm-svn: 283078
They've broken the sanitizer-bootstrap bots. Reverting while I investigate.
Original commit messages:
r283057: "[ConstantRange] Make getEquivalentICmp smarter"
r283058: "[SCEV] Rely on ConstantRange instead of custom logic; NFCI"
llvm-svn: 283062
Rename makeNoWrapRegion to a more obvious makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion,
and add a comment about the counter-intuitive aspects of the function.
This is to help prevent cases like PR26628.
llvm-svn: 261532
Summary: This will be used in a future change to ScalarEvolution.
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13612
llvm-svn: 250975
Summary:
This change splits `makeICmpRegion` into `makeAllowedICmpRegion` and
`makeSatisfyingICmpRegion` with slightly different contracts. The first
one is useful for determining what values some expression //may// take,
given that a certain `icmp` evaluates to true. The second one is useful
for determining what values are guaranteed to //satisfy// a given
`icmp`.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8345
llvm-svn: 232575
Multiplication is not dependent on signedness, so just treating
all input ranges as unsigned is not incorrect. However it will cause
overly pessimistic ranges (such as full-set) when used with signed
negative values.
Teach multiply to try to interpret its inputs as both signed and
unsigned, and then to take the most specific (smallest population)
as its result.
llvm-svn: 231483
a bit surprising, as the class is almost entirely abstracted away from
any particular IR, however it encodes the comparsion predicates which
mutate ranges as ICmp predicate codes. This is reasonable as they're
used for both instructions and constants. Thus, it belongs in the IR
library with instructions and constants.
llvm-svn: 202838
Marcello Maggioni