Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michał Górny 2f69c82cec [llvm] [lit] Support forcing lexical test order
Add a new --order option to choose between available test orders:
the default "smart" order, predictable "lexical" order or "random"
order.  Default to using lexical order and one job in the lit test
suite.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107695
2021-08-27 20:47:11 +02:00
Roman Lebedev ef4b3a4571
[NFCI][lit] Unbreak more lit self-tests after D98179
All of these depend on the order of tests, so if one runs them twice,
the tests within them will naturally be reordered
using the previous run times, which breaks them.
2021-03-22 15:25:32 +03:00
Joel E. Denny 6cecd3c3db [lit] Protect full test suite from FILECHECK_OPTS
lit's test suite calls lit multiple times for various sample test
suites.  `FILECHECK_OPTS` is safe for FileCheck calls in lit's test
suite.  It's not safe for FileCheck calls in the sample test suites,
whose output affects the results of lit's test suite.

Without this patch, only one such sample test suite is protected from
`FILECHECK_OPTS`, and currently `shtest-shell.py` breaks with
`FILECHECK_OPTS=-vv`.  Moreover, it's hard to predict the future,
especially false passes.  Thus, this patch protects all existing and
future sample test suites from `FILECHECK_OPTS` (and the deprecated
`FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE`).

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65156
2019-11-06 16:25:25 -05:00
Joel E. Denny c69c46ff7a Revert r366980: "[lit] Protect full test suite from FILECHECK_OPTS"
Windows bots are broken.  See recent D65335 and D65156 comments.

llvm-svn: 367627
2019-08-01 22:26:51 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 272a9db115 [lit] Protect full test suite from FILECHECK_OPTS
lit's test suite calls lit multiple times for various sample test
suites.  `FILECHECK_OPTS` is safe for FileCheck calls in lit's test
suite.  It's not safe for FileCheck calls in the sample test suites,
whose output affects the results of lit's test suite.

Without this patch, only one such sample test suite is protected from
`FILECHECK_OPTS`, and I admit I haven't discovered other cases for
which I can produce false failures using `FILECHECK_OPTS`.  However,
it's hard to predict the future, especially false passes.  Thus, this
patch protects all existing and future sample test suites from
`FILECHECK_OPTS` (and the deprecated
`FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE`).

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65156

llvm-svn: 366980
2019-07-25 03:14:32 +00:00
Dan Liew 105f4f2653 [lit] Make it possible for the lit test suite to pass with
`FILECHECK_OPTS=-v` set in the environment.

Follow up to r350850 as requested by Joel E. Denny in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56541 .

llvm-svn: 350854
2019-01-10 17:47:44 +00:00
Hans Wennborg c4b7e0125f Relax shtest-run-at-line.py
The test was failing on Windows machines which had bash.exe on PATH (but
not in the so called lit tools dir, containing cmp.exe, grep.exe etc.).

The problem was that the outer lit invocation would load LLVMConfig
from utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py, which looks up the tools path with
getToolsPath(). That has a surprising side effect of also setting
bashPath, in our case setting it to empty.

The outer lit invocation would thus configure the pdbg0 and pdbg1
substitutions based on not running with bash.

But the inner lit invocation would not load LLVMConfig, so bash
would be found on PATH, that would be used as external shell,
and so the output wouldn't match pdbg0 and pdbg1.

It seems weird to me that getBashPath() will return different results
depending on whether getToolsPath() has been called before, but I
also don't know how to fix it properly.

This commit just relaxes the test case, because there doesn't seem
to be much point in testing for the exact syntax of the run file
as long as it works.

(See https://crbug.com/850023)

llvm-svn: 334100
2018-06-06 14:53:03 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 44ee15f34f [lit] Fix windows cmd.exe test config for r333620
llvm-svn: 333630
2018-05-31 05:48:33 +00:00
Joel E. Denny fc01dd281d [lit] Terminate ": RUN at line N" with ";" not "&&"
This fixes projects/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/sigusr.test, which was
broken by r333614.  The trouble was that "&&" changes the command for
which "$!" gives the pid.

llvm-svn: 333620
2018-05-31 03:40:37 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 31b373963f [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
(Relands r333584, reverted in 333592.)

When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed.  For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.

When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of windows cmd.exe
as the external shell, this patch extends -vv to set "echo on" instead
of "echo off" in bat files.  (Support for windows cmd.exe as a lit
external shell will likely be dropped later, but I found out too
late.)

Reviewed By: delcypher,	asmith, stella.stamenova, jmorse, lebedev.ri, rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598

llvm-svn: 333614
2018-05-31 00:55:32 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 71792c741e Revert r333584: [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
It breaks test-suite.

llvm-svn: 333592
2018-05-30 21:07:27 +00:00
Joel E. Denny b6423479a1 [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
(Relands r330755 (reverted in r330848) with fix for PR37239.)

When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed.  For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.

When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of windows cmd.exe
as the external shell, this patch extends -vv to set "echo on" instead
of "echo off" in bat files.  (Support for windows cmd.exe as a lit
external shell will likely be dropped later, but I found out too
late.)

Reviewed By: delcypher,	asmith, stella.stamenova, jmorse, lebedev.ri, rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598

llvm-svn: 333584
2018-05-30 19:42:27 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 1ca666886f Revert r330755 "[lit] Report line number for failed RUN command"
It is causing many tests to fail on Windows buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/10211

llvm-svn: 330848
2018-04-25 17:30:00 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 8a475307bd [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed.  For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.

When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.

Reviewed By: asmith, delcypher

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598

llvm-svn: 330755
2018-04-24 18:43:25 +00:00