Support includes this header for the typedefs - but logically it's part
of the MC/Disassembler library that implements the functions. Split the
header so as not to create a circular dependency.
This is another case where probably inverting the llvm-c implementation
might be best (rather than core llvm libraries implementing the parts of
llvm-c - instead llvm-c could be its own library, depending on all the
parts of LLVM's core libraries to then implement llvm-c on top of
them... if that makes sense)
llvm-svn: 328744
This check "CHECK: {{#0 0x.* in .*aligned_alloc}}" fails on ppc64be, gcc
build. Disabling the test for gcc for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44404
llvm-svn: 328741
NonLocal is technically more accurate, but we already use the term
"Global" to specify the non-local part of the symbol table, and
Local <-> Global is easier to digest.
llvm-svn: 328740
This fixes pr36623.
The problem is that we have to parse versions out of names before LTO
so that LTO can use that information.
When we get the LTO produced .o files, we replace the previous symbols
with the LTO produced ones, but they still have @ in their names.
We could just trim the name directly, but calling parseSymbolVersion
to do it is simpler.
llvm-svn: 328738
Also make certain Thunk methods non-const as this will be required for
an upcoming change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44961
llvm-svn: 328732
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
Most of these were optional matches at the end of the strings, but since the strings themselves are prefix matches by default you don't need to check for something optional at the end.
I've left the 'b' on memory instructions where it means 'broadcast' because I'm not sure those really have the same load latency and we may need to split them explicitly in the future.
llvm-svn: 328730
Summary: Mark CFG is preserved since this pass do not make any change in CFG.
Reviewers: sebpop, mzolotukhin, mcrosier
Reviewed By: mzolotukhin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44845
llvm-svn: 328727
These instructions have been around for a long time, but we
haven't supported intrinsics for them. The "new" vesrions use
the CSx register for the start of the buffer instead of the K
field in the Mx register.
There is a related llvm patch.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328725
These instructions have been around for a long time, but we
haven't supported intrinsics for them. The "new" versions use
the CSx register for the start of the buffer instead of the K
field in the Mx register.
We need to use pseudo instructions for these instructions until
after register allocation. The problem is that these instructions
allocate a M0/CS0 or M1/CS1 pair. But, we can't generate code for
the CSx set-up until after register allocation when the Mx
register has been fixed for the instruction.
There is a related clang patch.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328724
We were assuming that vbtable indices were assigned in layout order in
our comparison, which is not the case. When a virtual method, such as
the destructor, appears in multiple vftables, the vftable that appears
first in object layout order is the one that points to the main
implementation of that method. The later vftables use thunks.
In this layout, we adjusted "this" in the main implementation by the
amount that is appropriate for 'B' instead of 'A', even though the main
implementation is found in D's vftable for A:
struct A {
virtual ~A() {}
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {}
};
struct C : virtual B {};
struct D : virtual A, C {};
D's layout looks like:
0 D subobject (empty)
0 C base suboject
8 A base subobject
16 B base subobject
With this fix, we correctly adjust by -8 in D's deleting destructor
instead of -16.
Fixes PR36921.
llvm-svn: 328723
Summary:
Currently many allocator specific errors (OOM, for example) are reported as
a text message and CHECK(0) termination, not stack, no details, not too
helpful nor informative. To improve the situation, ASan detailed errors were
defined and reported under the appropriate conditions.
Issue: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/887
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44404
llvm-svn: 328722
This commit simplifies the call outlining logic by removing references to the
Function associated with the callee. To do this, it requires that valid
callee save info is available to the outliner.
llvm-svn: 328719
This allows syntax like:
$ llvm-ar -c -r -u file.a file.o
This is in addition to the other formats that are already supported:
$ llvm-ar cru file.a file.o
$ llvm-ar -cru file.a file.o
Patch by Tom Anderson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44452
llvm-svn: 328716
Summary:
The "previous definition is here" note is not helpful if there is no location information. The note will reference nothing in such a case. This patch first checks to see if there is location data, and if so the note diagnostic is emitted.
This fixes PR15409. The issue in the first comment seems to already be resolved. This patch addresses the second example.
Reviewers: bruno, rsmith
Reviewed By: bruno
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44901
llvm-svn: 328712
Summary:
There aren't any matchers for the three vector operations: insertelement, extractelement, and
shufflevector. This patch adds them as well as corresponding unit tests.
llvm-svn: 328709
When the declare target variables are emitted for the device,
constructors|destructors for these variables must emitted and registered
by the runtime in the offloading sections.
llvm-svn: 328705
This reverts commit 771829b640a5494ab65c810dd6b4330522bf3a33 (rr328598)
Hopefully the test will now pass on the bots.
rdar://problem/38774530
llvm-svn: 328703
The `shtest-timeout.py` test was failing intermittently. It looks like
the issue is that on a resource constrained system lit is unable to run
`quick_then_slow.py` twice and print out the messages the tests expects
within the one second timeout.
The underlying issue is that the test is dependent on the performance of
the host machine is a rather fragile way. This is due to hardcoding
timeout values and having assumptions that the host machine is able to
perform a certain amount of work within the hardcoded timeout values.
We could increase the timeout values but that doesn't really fix the
underlying issue. Instead this patch removes one of fragile assumptions
in the hope that this will be enough to fix the bots.
There are other fragile assumptions in this test (e.g. `quick.py` can be
executed in less than 1 second). If the bots continue to fail we'll have
to revisit this.
rdar://problem/38774530
llvm-svn: 328702
This reverts commit r328676.
Commit r328676 broke the -no-integrated-as flag necessary to build Linux kernel with Clang:
$ cat t.c
void foo() {}
$ clang -no-integrated-as -c t.c -g
/tmp/t-dcdec5.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/t-dcdec5.s:8: Error: file number less than one
clang-7.0: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
llvm-svn: 328699
Similar to r328694. The number of micro opcodes should be 2 for those
instructions.
This was found when testing AVX code for BtVer2 using llvm-mca.
llvm-svn: 328698
This is a step towards the upcoming KMSAN implementation patch.
KMSAN is going to prepend a special basic block containing
tool-specific calls to each function. Because we still want to
instrument the original entry block, we'll need to store it in
ActualFnStart.
For MSan this will still be F.getEntryBlock(), whereas for KMSAN
it'll contain the second BB.
llvm-svn: 328697
This reverts commit 0daf86291d3aa04d3cc280cd0ef24abdb0174981.
It was causing an assert in test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/amdpal.ll only on a
release-with-asserts build. I will resubmit the change when I have fixed
that.
Change-Id: If270594eba27a7dc4076bdeab3fa8e6bfda3288a
llvm-svn: 328695
The Jaguar backend natively supports 128-bit data types. Operations on YMM
registers are split into two COPs (complex operations). Each COP consumes a slot
in the dispatch group, and in the reorder buffer.
The scheduling model for Jaguar should mark those instructions as `let
NumMicroOps = 2`.
This was found when testing AVX code for BtVer2 using llvm-mca.
llvm-svn: 328694
David Blaikie