The attribute emitter was using FunctionTemplate to map the diagnostic to "functions or methods", but that isn't a particularly clear diagnostic in these cases anyway (since they do not apply to ObjC methods). Updated the attribute emitter to remove custom logic for FunctionTemplateDecl, and updated the test cases for the change in diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 209209
This is a GNU attribute that allows split stacks to be turned off on a
per-function basis.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3817
llvm-svn: 209167
The conventional form is '<action> to silence this warning'.
Also call the diagnostic an 'issue' rather than a 'message' because the latter
term is more widely used with reference to message expressions.
llvm-svn: 209052
caused us to perform copy-initialization for the parameters of an allocation
function called by a new-expression multiple times, resulting in us rejecting
allocations that passed non-copyable parameters (and much worse things in
MSVC compat mode, where we potentially called this function multiple times).
llvm-svn: 208724
The base class is the culprit/risk here - a sealed/final derived class
with virtual functions and a non-virtual dtor can't accidentally be
polymorphically destroyed (if the base class's dtor is protected - which
also suppresses this warning).
llvm-svn: 208449
This lets us diagnose and perform more complete semantic analysis when faced
with errors in the function body or declaration.
By recovering here we provide more consistent diagnostics, particularly during
interactive editing.
llvm-svn: 208394
A template declaration of a template name can be null in case we have a dependent name or a set of function templates.
Hence use dyn_cast_or_null instead of dyn_cast. Also improve the diagnostic emitted in this case.
llvm-svn: 208313
C++. This seems like a pointless (and indeed harmful) restriction to me, so
I've suggested removing it to -core and disabled this diagnostic by default.
llvm-svn: 208254
Libraries specify enabled/disabled features using macro defs of 0/1, in such cases the -Wconstant-logical-operand
is noise.
rdar://15410291
llvm-svn: 207386
We never aka vector types because our attributed syntax for it is less
comprehensible than the typedefs. This leaves the user in the dark when
the typedef isn't named that well.
Example:
v2s v; v4f w;
w = v;
The naming in this cases isn't even that bad, but the error we give is
useless without looking up the actual typedefs.
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' from incompatible type 'v2s'
Now:
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' (vector of 4 'float' values) from
incompatible type 'v2s' (vector of 2 'int' values)
We do this for all diagnostics that print a vector type.
llvm-svn: 207267
-Wc++11-compat-deprecated-writable-strings. It's neither a C++11 compatibility
warning nor a deprecated feature, it's just ill-formed.
In passing, add that warning to -Wdeprecated, where it belongs.
llvm-svn: 206833
Warn on std::abs() with unsigned argument.
Suggest std::abs as replacement for the C absolute value functions.
Suggest C++ headers if the specific std::abs overload is not found.
llvm-svn: 206340
Parse of nested name spacifier is modified so that it properly recovers
if colon is mistyped as double colon in case statement.
This patch fixes PR15133.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2870
llvm-svn: 206135
If the C-style type cast is applied to the overloaded
function and the destination type is function type,
then Clang will crash with assertion failure. For example,
void foo(int);
void foo(int, int);
void bar() {
typedef void (ft)(int);
ft p = (ft)foo;
}
In this case, the overloaded function foo will be cast to
a function type, which should be considered as an error.
But, unfortunately, since the function resolution is using
canonical type, the matched function will be returned, and
result in SEGV.
This patch fixes this issue by removing the assertion and
add some error diagnostics as the one in static_cast.
llvm-svn: 206133
declaration is not visible. Previously we didn't find hidden friend names in
this redeclaration lookup, because we forgot to treat it as a redeclaration
lookup. Conversely, we did find some local extern names, but those don't
actually conflict with a namespace-scope using declaration, because the only
conflicts we can get are scope conflicts, not conflicts due to the entities
being members of the same namespace.
llvm-svn: 206011
which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
obviously won't work. Specifically, don't suggest methods (static or
not) from unrelated classes when the expression is a method call
through a specific object.
llvm-svn: 205653
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
meaningful to odr-use the VarDecl inside a variable template. (Separately, it'd
be nice to track referenced-ness for templates, and warn on unused ones, but
that's really a distinct issue...)
Move a test that generates and tests a warning-suppressing error out to its own
test file, so it doesn't have weird effects on the other tests in the same file.
llvm-svn: 205448
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
While investigating some debug info issues, Eric and I came across a
particular template case where the location of a decl was quite
different from the range of the same decl. It might've been rather
helpful if the dumper had actually showed us this.
llvm-svn: 205396
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
The exception is return statements that include control-flow,
which are clearly doing something "interesting".
99% of the cases I examined for -Wunreachable-code that fired
on return statements were not interesting enough to warrant
being in -Wunreachable-code by default. Thus the move to
include them in -Wunreachable-code-return.
This simplifies a bunch of logic, including removing the ad hoc
logic to look for std::string literals.
llvm-svn: 204307
Also relax unreachable 'break' and 'return' to not check for being
preceded by a call to 'noreturn'. That turns out to not be so
interesting in practice.
llvm-svn: 204000
Recent work on -Wunreachable-code has focused on suppressing uninteresting
unreachable code that center around "configuration values", but
there are still some set of cases that are sometimes interesting
or uninteresting depending on the codebase. For example, a dead
"break" statement may not be interesting for a particular codebase,
potentially because it is auto-generated or simply because code
is written defensively.
To address these workflow differences, -Wunreachable-code is now
broken into several diagnostic groups:
-Wunreachable-code: intended to be a reasonable "default" for
most users.
and then other groups that turn on more aggressive checking:
-Wunreachable-code-break: warn about dead break statements
-Wunreachable-code-trivial-return: warn about dead return statements
that return "trivial" values (e.g., return 0). Other return
statements that return non-trivial values are still reported
under -Wunreachable-code (this is an area subject to more refinement).
-Wunreachable-code-aggressive: supergroup that enables all these
groups.
The goal is to eventually make -Wunreachable-code good enough to
either be in -Wall or on-by-default, thus finessing these warnings
into different groups helps achieve maximum signal for more users.
TODO: the tests need to be updated to reflect this extra control
via diagnostic flags.
llvm-svn: 203994
This can possibly be refined later, but right now the experience
is so incomprehensible for a user to understand what is going on
this isn't a useful warning.
llvm-svn: 203336
This patch fixes PR18964. In linkage computation, assertion fails when
an old invalid declaration's linkage mismatches with the current
decl's one.
llvm-svn: 203168
I have mixed feelings about this one. It's used all over the codebase,
and is analogous to the current heuristic for ordinary C string literals.
This requires some ad hoc pattern matching of the AST. While the
test case mirrors what we see std::string in libc++, it's not really
testing the libc++ headers.
llvm-svn: 203091
Sometimes do..while() is used to create a scope that can be left early.
In such cases, the unreachable 'while()' test is not usually interesting
unless it actually does something that is observable.
llvm-svn: 203051
Summary:
This is needed to allow MSVC's <atomic> header to properly parse.
It uses _Atomic as a class-id.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2948
llvm-svn: 202901
const char *format = "%s";
std::experimental::string_view view = "foo";
printf(format, view);
In this case, not only warn about a class type being used here, but also suggest that calling c_str() might be a good idea.
llvm-svn: 202461
or virtual functions, but permit that error to be downgraded to
a warning (with -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct), and officially
support this kind of dual, ABI-mixing layout.
The basic problem here is that projects which use ms_struct are often
not very circumspect about what types they annotate; for example,
some projects enable the pragma in a prefix header and then only
selectively disable it around system header inclusions. They may
only care about binary compatibility with MSVC for a subset of
those structs, but that doesn't mean they have no binary
compatibility concerns at all for the rest; thus we are essentially
forced into supporting this hybrid ABI. But it's reasonable for
us to at least point out the places where we're not making
any guarantees.
The original diagnostic was for dynamic classes, i.e. those with
virtual functions or virtual bases; I've extended it to include
all classes with bases, because we are not actually making any
attempt to duplicate MSVC's base subobject layout in ms_struct
(and it is indeed quite different from Itanium, even for
non-virtual bases).
rdar://16178895
llvm-svn: 202427
null comparison when the pointer is known to be non-null.
This catches the array to pointer decay, function to pointer decay and
address of variables. This does not catch address of function since this
has been previously used to silence a warning.
Pointer to bool conversion is under -Wbool-conversion.
Pointer to null comparison is under -Wtautological-pointer-compare, a sub-group
of -Wtautological-compare.
void foo() {
int arr[5];
int x;
// warn on these conditionals
if (foo);
if (arr);
if (&x);
if (foo == null);
if (arr == null);
if (&x == null);
if (&foo); // no warning
}
llvm-svn: 202216
The warnings fall into three groups.
1) Using an absolute value function of the wrong type, for instance, using the
int absolute value function when the argument is a floating point type.
2) Using the improper sized absolute value function, for instance, using abs
when the argument is a long long. llabs should be used instead.
From these two cases, an implicit conversion will occur which may cause
unexpected behavior. Where possible, suggest the proper absolute value
function to use, and which header to include if the function is not available.
3) Taking the absolute value of an unsigned value. In addition to this warning,
suggest to remove the function call. This usually indicates a logic error
since the programmer assumed negative values would have been possible.
llvm-svn: 202211
- Don't emit anything when we encounter a call to a conversion operator.
"bar(a & b)" instead of "bar(a & b.operator int())"
This preserves the semantics and is still idempotent if we print the AST multiple times.
- Properly print declarations of conversion operators.
"explicit operator bool();" instead of "bool operator _Bool();"
PR18776.
llvm-svn: 202167
We were previously checking at every destructor declaration, but that was a bit
excessive. Since the deleting destructor is emitted with the vtable, do the
check when the vtable is marked used.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2851
llvm-svn: 202046
DR18 previously forebode typedefs to be used as parameter types if they
were of type 'void'. DR577 allows 'void' to be used as a function
parameter type regardless from where it came.
llvm-svn: 201631
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
temporary in a decltype expression only applies if that temporary was created
by a function call, not by a function-style cast or other flavour of
expression.
llvm-svn: 201542
For some reason we have two bits of code handling this printing:
lib/AST/Decl.cpp: OS << "<anonymous namespace>";
lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp: OS << "<anonymous namespace>::";
it would be nice if we only had one...
llvm-svn: 201437
and the class name is shadowed by another member. Recovery still needs
to be figured out, which is non-trivial since the parser has already gone
down a much different path than if it had recognized the class template
as type instead of seeing the member that shadowed the class template.
llvm-svn: 201360
These features are new in VS 2013 and are necessary in order to layout
std::ostream correctly. Currently we have an ABI incompatibility when
self-hosting with the 2013 stdlib in our convertible_fwd_ostream wrapper
in gtest.
This change adds another implicit attribute, MSVtorDispAttr, because
implicit attributes are currently the best way to make sure the
information stays on class templates through instantiation.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2746
llvm-svn: 201274
These flags control the inheritance model initially used by the
translation unit.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2741
llvm-svn: 201175
Introduce a notion of a 'current representation method' for
pointers-to-members.
When starting out, this is set to 'best case' (representation method is
chosen by examining the class, selecting the smallest representation
that would work given the class definition or lack thereof).
This pragma allows the translation unit to dictate exactly what
representation to use, similar to how the inheritance model keywords
operate.
N.B. PCH support is forthcoming.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2723
llvm-svn: 201105
Rather than simply saying "X is not a class or namespace", clarify what
X is by providing the aka type in the case where X is a type, or
pointing to the named declaration if there's an unambiguous one to refer
to. In the ambiguous case, the ambiguities are already enumerated
(though could be clarified by describing what kind of entities they are)
Included a few FIXMEs in tests where some further improvements could be
made.
llvm-svn: 201038
unique them and permits the implementation of dynamic_cast (and
anything else which knows it's working with a complete class
type) to compare their addresses directly.
rdar://16005328
llvm-svn: 201020
Summary:
This avoids false positives from -Wmicrosoft when name lookup would
normally succeed in standard C++. This triggered on a common CRTP
pattern in clang, where a derived class would have a private using decl
to pull in members of a dependent base:
class Verifier : InstVisitor<Verifier> {
private:
using InstVisitor<Verifier>::visit;
...
void anything() {
visit(); // warned here
}
};
Real access checks pass here because we're in the context of the
Verifier, but the -Wmicrosoft extension was just looking for the private
access specifier.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2679
llvm-svn: 201019
'operator delete' or 'operator delete[]' is an explicit exception
specification. Therefore we should diagnose 'void operator delete(void*)'
instead of 'void operator delete(void*) noexcept'.
This diagnostic remains an ExtWarn, since in practice people don't always
include the exception specification in such a declaration.
llvm-svn: 201002
If we are in the middle of defining the class, don't attempt to
validate previously annotated declarations. We may not have seen base
specifiers or virtual method declarations yet.
llvm-svn: 200959
type-dependent variable, even if the initializer isn't value-dependent. This
happens for ParenListExprs composed of non-value-dependent subexpressions, for
instance.
We should really give ParenListExprs (and InitListExprs) the type of the
initialized entity if they're used to represent a dependent initialization (and
if so, set them to be type-, value- and instantiation-dependent).
llvm-svn: 200954
In the following code:
struct A { static const int sz; };
template<class T> void f() { T arr[A::sz]; }
the array 'arr' is represented as a variable size array in the template.
If 'A::sz' gets value below in the translation unit, the array in
instantiation can turn into constant size array.
This change fixes PR18633.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2688
llvm-svn: 200899
Because in C++, "anonymous" doesn't mean "nameless" for records. In
other words, RecordDecl::isAnonymousStructOrUnion only returns true if
the record lacks a name *and* is not used as the type in an object's
declaration.
llvm-svn: 200868
When a lax conversion featured a vector and a non-vector, we were
only requiring the non-vector to be a scalar type, but really it
needs to be a real type (i.e. integral or real floating); it is
not reasonable to allow a pointer, member pointer, or complex
type here.
r198474 required lax conversions to match in "data size", i.e.
element size * element count, forbidding matches that happen
only because a vector is rounded up to the nearest power of two
in size. Unfortunately, the erroneous logic was repeated in
several different places; unify them to use the new condition,
so that it triggers for arbitrary conversions and not just
those performed as part of binary operator checking.
rdar://15931426
llvm-svn: 200810
redeclaration, not just when looking them up for a use -- we need the implicit
declaration to appropriately check various properties of them (notably, whether
they're deleted).
llvm-svn: 200729
With this change, we give different results for __alignof than MSVC, but
our record layout is compatible.
Some data member pointers also now have a size that is not a multiple of
their alignment.
Fixes PR18618.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2669
llvm-svn: 200585
a previously-computed linkage as an unsupportable error condition.
Per discussion on cfe-commits, this appears to be a
difficult-to-resolve flaw in our implementation approach;
we may pursue this as a language defect, but for now it's
better to diagnose it as unsupported than to produce
inconsistent results (or assertions). Anything that we can
do to limit how often this diagnostic fires, such as the
changes in r200380, is probably for the best, though.
llvm-svn: 200438
We would previously allow inappropriate inheritance keywords to appear
on class declarations. We would also allow inheritance keywords on
templates which were not fully specialized; this was divergent from
MSVC.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2585
llvm-svn: 200423
the linkage cache) when type-checking static local
variables.
There's a very deep problem here where the linkage of
a declaration can suddenly massively change as soon as
it's given a typedef name; these fixes, while optimizations
in their own right, are really just targeted workarounds.
rdar://15928125
llvm-svn: 200380
initialized from a constant expression in C++98, it can be used in
constant expressions, even if it was brace-initialized. Patch by
Rahul Jain!
llvm-svn: 200098
Previously, string literals were ignored in all logical expressions. This
reduces it to only ignore in logical and expressions.
assert(0 && "error"); // No warning
assert(0 || "error"); // Warn
Fixes PR17565
llvm-svn: 200056
override for the type of 'this', also clear it out (unless we're entering the
context of a lambda-expression, where it should be inherited).
llvm-svn: 199962
Aaron Ballman