The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
Same as r235145 for the call instruction - the justification, tradeoffs,
etc are all the same. The conversion script worked the same without any
false negatives (after replacing 'call' with 'invoke').
llvm-svn: 235755
in the Ada testcase. Reverting this only covers up
the real problem, which is a nasty conceptual difficulty
in the phi elimination pass: when eliminating phi nodes
in landing pads, the register copies need to come before
the invoke, not at the end of the basic block which is
too late... See PR3784.
llvm-svn: 66826
David Majnemer