All these tests already explicitly test against both legacy PM and NPM.
$ sed -i 's/ -attributor / -attributor -enable-new-pm=0 /g' $(rg --path-separator // -l -- -passes=)
$ sed -i 's/ -attributor-cgscc / -attributor-cgscc -enable-new-pm=0 /g' $(rg --path-separator // -l -- -passes=)
Now all tests in Transforms/Attributor/ pass under NPM.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84813
Summary:
All tests are updated, except wrapper.ll since it is not working nicely
with newly created functions.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku, baziotis, homerdin
Subscribers: arphaman, jfb, kuter, bbn, okura, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84130
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
We now use getPointerDereferenceableBytes to determine `nonnull` and
`dereferenceable` facts from the IR. We also use getPointerAlignment in
AAAlign for the same reason. The latter can interfere with callbacks so
we do restrict it to non-function-pointers for now.
Attributes that only depend on the value (=bit pattern) can be
initialized from uses in the must-be-executed-context (MBEC). We did use
`AAComposeTwoGenericDeduction` and `AAFromMustBeExecutedContext` before
to do this for some positions of these attributes but not for all. This
was fairly complicated and also problematic as we did run it in every
`updateImpl` call even though we only use known information. The new
implementation removes `AAComposeTwoGenericDeduction`* and
`AAFromMustBeExecutedContext` in favor of a simple interface
`AddInformation::fromMBEContext(...)` which we call from the
`initialize` methods of the "value attribute" `Impl` classes, e.g.
`AANonNullImpl:initialize`.
There can be two types of test changes:
1) Artifacts were we miss some information that was known before a
global fixpoint was reached and therefore available in an update
but not at the beginning.
2) Deduction for values we did not derive via the MBEC before or which
were not found as the `AAFromMustBeExecutedContext::updateImpl` was
never invoked.
* An improved version of AAComposeTwoGenericDeduction can be found in
D78718. Once we find a new use case that implementation will be able
to handle "generic" AAs better.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 468428 (328952/s)
temporary memory allocations: 77480 (54410/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 32.71MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 122.46MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 554720 (351310/s)
temporary memory allocations: 101650 (64376/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 28.46MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 116.75MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: 86292 (556722/s)
temporary memory allocations: 24170 (155935/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -4.25MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78719
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
A pointer is privatizeable if it can be replaced by a new, private one.
Privatizing pointer reduces the use count, interaction between unrelated
code parts. This is a first step towards replacing argument promotion.
While we can already handle recursion (unlike argument promotion!) we
are restricted to stack allocations for now because we do not analyze
the uses in the callee.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68852
Arthur Eubanks