Summary:
The crash happens when calling `reset` method without any preceding
operation like "->" or ".", this could happen in a subclass of the
"std::unique_ptr".
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36452
llvm-svn: 310496
Summary:
The check doesn't fully support smart-ptr usages inside macros, which
may cause incorrect fixes, or even crashes, ignore them for now.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36264
llvm-svn: 310050
Use getAnyMember() instead of getMember() to avoid crash on anonymous
structs/unions.
Don't warn about initializing members of an anonymous union.
Fixes PR32966.
Reviewed by alexfh.
llvm-svn: 309668
Summary:
For the following code: `modernize-use-override` generates a replacement with incorrect location.
```
struct IntPair
{
int first, second;
};
struct A
{
virtual void il(IntPair);
};
struct B : A
{
void il(IntPair p = {1, (2 + 3)}) {};
// Generated Fixit: void il(IntPair p = override {1, (2 + 3)}) {};
// Should be: void il(IntPair p = {1, (2 + 3)}) override {};
};
```
This fixes that and adds a unit test.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Victor Gao!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35078
llvm-svn: 307379
Summary:
If the class being created in unique_ptr is in anonymous nampespace, the
anonymous namespace will be included in the apply-fixes. This patch fix
this.
```
namespace {
class Foo {};
}
std::unique_ptr<Foo> f;
f.reset(new Foo());
// Before the change: f = std::make_unique<(annonymous namespace)::Foo>();
// After the change: f = std::make_unique<Foo>();
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34286
llvm-svn: 306378
Summary:
The FP happens when a casting nullptr expression is used within a NULL-default-arguemnt cxx constructor.
Before the fix, the check will give a warning on nullptr when running
with the test case, which should not happen:
```
G(g(static_cast<char*>(nullptr)));
^~~~~~~~~~~
nullptr
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34524
llvm-svn: 306091
Summary:
New checker to replace dynamic exception
specifications
This is an alternative to D18575 which relied on reparsing the decl to
find the location of dynamic exception specifications, but couldn't
deal with preprocessor conditionals correctly without reparsing the
entire file.
This approach uses D20428 to find dynamic exception specification
locations and handles all cases correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, mgehre, malcolm.parsons, mgorny, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits, Eugene.Zelenko, etienneb
Patch by Don Hinton!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20693
llvm-svn: 304977
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303145
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303139
Summary:
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on cppunit client code where the
macro is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32945
llvm-svn: 302429
modernize-use-equals-delete is extremely noisy in code using
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN-style macros and there's no easy way to automatically
fix the warning when macros are in play.
llvm-svn: 302425
Summary: Use the cxxStdInitializerListExp matcher from ASTMatchers.h instead of a local one.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, Prazek
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32923
llvm-svn: 302317
Summary:
This patch fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]].
The problem was that modernize-use-emplace incorrectly removed changed push_back into emplace_back, removing explicit constructor call with initializer list parameter, resulting in compiler error after applying fixits.
modernize-use-emplace used to check if matched constructor had InitListExpr, but didn't check against CXXStdInitializerListExpr.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v;
v.push_back(std::vector<int>({1})); // --> v.emplace_back({1});
```
Reviewers: Prazek, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767
llvm-svn: 302281
Summary:
When there is a push_back with a call to make_pair, turn it into emplace_back and remove the unnecessary make_pair call.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::pair<int, int>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_pair(1, 2)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 2);
```
make_pair doesn't get removed when explicit template parameters are provided, because of potential problems with type conversions.
Reviewers: Prazek, aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32395
llvm-svn: 301651
This check will find occurrences of ``std::random_shuffle`` and replace it with ``std::shuffle``. In C++17 ``std::random_shuffle`` will no longer be available and thus we need to replace it.
Example of case that it fixes
```
std::vector<int> v;
// First example
std::random_shuffle(vec.begin(), vec.end());
```
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30158
llvm-svn: 301167
- removed unnessacary namespaces
- added option to print warning in macros
- no fix for typedef with array
- removed "void" word from functions with 0 parameters
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29262
llvm-svn: 299340
Summary:
Fix generated by modernize-use-override caused syntax error when method
used try-statement as a body. `override` keyword was inserted after last
declaration token which happened to be a `try` keyword.
This fixes PR27119.
Reviewers: ehsan, djasper, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Paweł Żukowski!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30002
llvm-svn: 296598
Summary:
Replaces explicit calls to the constructor in a return with a braced
initializer list. This way the return type is not needlessly duplicated in the
return type and the return statement.
```
Foo bar() {
Baz baz;
return Foo(baz);
}
// transforms to:
Foo bar() {
Baz baz;
return {baz};
}
```
Reviewers: hokein, Prazek, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28768
llvm-svn: 295199
Fixes PR30964. The old behavior can be achieved using a setting.
Patch by: Andras Leitereg!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28667
llvm-svn: 292938
Summary:
rL270567 excluded trivially copyable types from being moved by
modernize-pass-by-value, but it didn't exclude references to them.
Change types used in the tests to not be trivially copyable.
Reviewers: madsravn, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28614
llvm-svn: 291796
Summary:
Default member initializers cannot refer to constructor parameters, but modernize-default-member-init was trying to when the default constructor had default arguments.
Change the check to ignore default arguments to the default constructor.
Fixes PR31524.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, JDevlieghere, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28287
llvm-svn: 290972
Summary:
An addition to the move-constructor-init check was duplicating the
modernize-pass-by-value check.
Remove the additional check and UseCERTSemantics option.
Run the move-constructor-init test with both checks enabled.
Fix modernize-pass-by-value false-positive when initializing a base
class.
Add option to modernize-pass-by-value to only warn about parameters
that are already values.
Reviewers: alexfh, flx, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26453
llvm-svn: 290051
Summary:
Use auto when declaring variables that are initialized by calling a templated
function that returns its explicit first argument.
Fixes PR26763.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, staronj, Prazek
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27166
llvm-svn: 289797
Summary:
Warn about special member functions that only contain a comment.
Report the location of the special member function, unless it is
defined in a macro. Reporting the location of the body in a macro is
more helpful as it causes the macro expansion location to be reported too.
Fixes PR30920.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26741
llvm-svn: 287215
Summary:
Duplicate fixes were being created for explicit template instantiations
of out-of-line constructors or destructors.
Fixes PR30921.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26582
llvm-svn: 287091
Summary:
Extend modernize-use-auto to cases when a variable is assigned with a cast.
e.g.
Type *Ptr1 = dynamic_cast<Type*>(Ptr2);
http://llvm.org/PR25499
Reviewers: angelgarcia, aaron.ballman, klimek, Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: Prazek, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25316
llvm-svn: 285579
Summary:
clang-tidy now cleans up after replacements, so leave colon and comma
removal to that.
Reviewers: angelgarcia, alexfh, aaron.ballman, djasper, ioeric
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25769
llvm-svn: 284735
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy and i should hope this one is the correct mailing list.
The check is modernize-avoid-bind.
Consider the following:
void bar(int x, int y);
namespace N {
void bar(int x, int y);
}
void foo(){
auto Test = std::bind(N::bar,1,1);
}
clang-tidy’s modernize-avoid-bind check suggests writing:
void foo(){
auto Test =[] {return bar(1,1);};
}
instead of:
void foo(){
auto Test = [] {return N::bar(1,1);};
}
So clang-tidy has proposed an incorrect Fix.
Patch by IdrissRio!
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscriber: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 284719
Summary:
This fixes a false-positive e.g. when string literals are returned from if statement.
This patch includes as well a small fix to includes and renames of the test suite that collided with the name of the check.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: hokein
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25558
llvm-svn: 284212
Summary:
Only member initializers that are written should prevent
using '= default' on a default constructor.
Reviewers: klimek, sbenza, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24444
llvm-svn: 283869
Summary:
Bugfix for 27321. When the constructor of stored pointer
type is private then it is invalid to change it to
make_shared or make_unique.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23343
llvm-svn: 280180
Summary:
Depends on D23204.
This is intended to be submitted immediately after D23204 lands.
Reviewers: jdennett, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23543
llvm-svn: 278934
This patch introduces a minor list of changes as proposed by Richard Smith in
the mailing list.
See original comments with an impact on the future check state below:
[comments.begin
> + {"complex.h", "ccomplex"},
It'd be better to convert this one to <complex>, or leave it alone.
<ccomplex> is an unnecessary wart.
(The contents of C++11's <complex.h> / <ccomplex> / <complex> (all of
which are identical) aren't comparable to C99's <complex.h>, so if
this was C++98 code using the C99 header, the code will be broken with
or without this transformation.)
> + {"iso646.h", "ciso646"},
Just delete #includes of this one. <ciso646> does nothing.
> + {"stdalign.h", "cstdalign"},
> + {"stdbool.h", "cstdbool"},
We should just delete these two includes. These headers do nothing in C++.
comments.end]
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17990
llvm-svn: 278254
Summary:
D22566 will change RecursiveASTVisitor so that it descends into the initialization expressions for lambda captures.
modernize-loop-convert needs to be prepared for this so that it does not interpret these initialization expressions as invalid uses of the loop variable. The change has no ill effects without D22566 in place, i.e. the change does not depend on D22566.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22903
llvm-svn: 277339
Summary:
Previoly, the added test failed with the fillowing fixit:
char v[5];
- for(size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
+ for(char value : v)
{
- unsigned char value = v[i];
if (value > 127)
i.e. the variable 'value' changes from unsigned char to signed char. And
thus the following 'if' does not work anymore.
With this commit, the fixit is changed to:
char v[5];
- for(size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
+ for(unsigned char value : v)
{
- unsigned char value = v[i];
if (value > 127)
Reviewers: alexfh, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22069
llvm-svn: 276111
Summary: This is a fix for the new ExprWithCleanups introduced by clang's temporary variable lifetime marks change.
Reviewers: bkramer, sbenza, angelgarcia, alexth
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21243
llvm-svn: 273310
Summary:
By default, modernize-use-auto check will retain stars when replacing an explicit type with `auto`: `MyType *t = new MyType;` will be changed to `auto *t = new MyType;`, thus resulting in more consistency with the recommendations to use `auto *` for iterating over pointers in range-based for loops: http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#beware-unnecessary-copies-with-auto
The new `RemoveStars` option allows to revert to the old behavior: with the new option turned on the check will change `MyType *t = new MyType;` to `auto t = new MyType;`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sbenza
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20917
llvm-svn: 271739
Modified the clang-tidy PassByValue check. It now stops adding std::move to type which is trivially copyable because that caused the clang-tidy MoveConstArg to complain and revert, thus creating a cycle.
I have also added a lit-style test to verify the bugfix.
This is the bug on bugzilla: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27731
This is the code review on phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20365
llvm-svn: 270565
Summary:
This patch is lifting matchers used by more than one checkers
to the common namespace.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19841
llvm-svn: 269804
Summary:
This patch adds a check that replaces std::bind with a lambda.
Not yet working for member functions.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16962
llvm-svn: 269341
Summary:
This is a step forward cleaning up the namespaces in clang-tidy/utils.
There is no behavior change.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19819
llvm-svn: 268356
Summary:
The goal of the patch is to bring checkers in their appropriate namespace.
This path doesn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19811
llvm-svn: 268264
Because modernize-make-shared do almost the same job as
modernize-make-unique, I refactored common code to MakeSmartPtrCheck.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19183
llvm-svn: 268253
Summary:
Little cleanup to lift-out and to remove some frequently used
ast-matchers.
Some of theses matchers are candidates to be lifted to ASTMatchers.h.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19200
llvm-svn: 267003
Summary:
Clang-tidy modernize-raw-string-literal check crashes on run-time assert while it is evaluating compiler predefined identifiers such as
- __FUNCTION__
- __func__
- __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
Check is asserting because it cannot find opening quote for such string literal. It occurs only on debug build config.
I think that it would be good to prune such cases by crossing off predefined expressions - there is no need to evaluate such matches.
Reviewers: LegalizeAdulthood, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Marek Jenda!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19331
llvm-svn: 266992
Fix for __declspec attributes and const=0 without space
This patch is to address 2 problems I found with Clang-tidy:modernize-use-override.
1: missing spaces on pure function decls.
Orig:
void pure() const=0
Problem:
void pure() constoverride =0
Fixed:
void pure() const override =0
2: This is ms-extension specific, but possibly applies to other attribute types. The override is placed before the attribute which doesn’t work well with declspec as this attribute can be inherited or placed before the method identifier.
Orig:
class __declspec(dllexport) X : public Y
{
void p();
};
Problem:
class override __declspec(dllexport) class X : public Y
{
void p();
};
Fixed:
class __declspec(dllexport) class X : public Y
{
void p() override;
};
Patch by Robert Bolter!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18396
llvm-svn: 265298
Summary:
Fix assertion failure: "Name is not a simple identifier".
`Decl::GetName` assumes the name should be an identifier. When the check
processes the function calling statement with speciail key name like
'it.operator->()', it will trigger the assert in `GetName`.
Rather than using `Decl::GetName`, we use `getNameAsString` which works
with special key names in C++.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18141
llvm-svn: 263426
Summary:
This patch introduces the modernize-deprecated-headers check, which is supposed to replace deprecated C library headers with the C++ STL-ones.
For information see documentation; for exmaples see the test cases.
Reviewers: Eugene.Zelenko, LegalizeAdulthood, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Kirill Bobyrev!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17484
llvm-svn: 261738
Summary:
The test code will trigger following an assert failure:
assert.h assertion failed at LoopConvertUtils.cpp:560 in
bool clang::tidy::modernize::ForLoopIndexUseVisitor::TraverseMemberExpr(clang::MemberExpr*): ExprType->isPointerType() && "Operator-> returned non-pointer type"
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17287
llvm-svn: 260953
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
-J. Robert Oppenheimer
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, echristo
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16475
llvm-svn: 258864
Summary: Consider a declaration an alias even if it doesn't have the same unqualified type than the container element, as long as one can be converted to the other using only implicit casts.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14442
llvm-svn: 252315
Summary: Use the old index name in the cases where the check would come up with an invented name.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14438
llvm-svn: 252308
Summary: The old index declaration is going to be removed anyway, so we can reuse its name if it is the best candidate for the new index.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14437
llvm-svn: 252303
Summary:
If the container expression was obtained from the point where "size" (which usually is a const method) is invoked, then the topmost node in this expression may be an implicit cast to const.
When the container is a data member, the check was trying to obtain the member expression directly and was failing in the case mentioned above. This is solved by ignoring implicit casts.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14378
llvm-svn: 252278
Summary: "std::unique_ptr<int>" is not the same type as "std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int>>", unless we insert a "hasCanonicalType" in the middle. Probably it also happens in other cases related to default template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14291
llvm-svn: 252041
Summary:
I recently found that the variable naming wasn't working as expected with containers that are data members. The new index always received the name "Elem" (or equivalent) regardless of the container's name.
The check was assuming that the container's declaration was a VarDecl, which cannot be converted to a FieldDecl (a data member), and then it could never retrieve its name.
This also fixes some cases where the check failed to find the container at all (so it didn't do any fix) because of the same reason.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14289
llvm-svn: 251943
Summary: The previous change was focused in detecting when a non-const object was used in a constant way. Looks like I forgot the most important and trivial case: when the object is already constant. Failing to detect this cases results in compile errors, due to trying to bind a constant object to a non-const reference in the range-for statement. This change should fix that.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14282
llvm-svn: 251940
Summary:
Now, it detects that several kinds of usages are can't modify the elements. Examples:
-When an usage is a call to a const member function or operator of the element.
-If the element is used as an argument to a function or constructor that takes a const-reference or a value.
-LValue to RValue conversion, if the element is a fundamental type (which allows the use of most of the builtin operators).
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14198
llvm-svn: 251808
Summary: The check was assuming that a definition of a function always has a body, but a declaration that explicitly defaults or deletes a function is a definition too.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14238
llvm-svn: 251807
Summary: When traversing the parent map, the check assumed that all the nodes would be either Stmt or Decl. After r251101, this is no longer true: there can be TypeLoc and NestedNameSpecifierLoc nodes.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14229
llvm-svn: 251803
Summary:
When applying this check to the unit tests, it would hit an assertion:
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:1056: clang::SourceLocation clang::Lexer::getSourceLocation(const char*, unsigned int) const: Assertion `PP && "This doesn't work on raw lexers"' failed.
Reviewers: klimek, LegalizeAdulthood, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14204
llvm-svn: 251792
Summary: the check will now warn when the user provided definitions of this functions is equivalent to the explicitly defaulted ones.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14145
llvm-svn: 251788
Summary: If the size of the type is above a certain bound, we'll take a const reference. This bound can be set as an option. For now, the default value is 16 bytes.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14176
llvm-svn: 251694
This check for clang-tidy looks for function with zero arguments declared as (void) and removes the unnecessary void token.
int foo(void);
becomes
int foo();
The check performs no formatting of the surrounding context but uses the lexer to look for the token sequence "(", "void", ")" in the prototype text. If this sequence of tokens is found, a removal is issued for the void token only.
Patch by Richard Thomson!
(+fixed tests, moved the check to the modernize module)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639
llvm-svn: 251475
Summary: using "auto" on a loop that iterates over ints is kind of an overkill. Use the real type name instead.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13982
llvm-svn: 251015
Summary: Take into account the current LangOptions the check has to add back the template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13983
llvm-svn: 251013
Summary: Add static to global variables, if they are not in an anonymous namespace.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13975
llvm-svn: 251005
Summary:
Add a check that replaces empty bodies of special member functions with '= default;'.
For now, it is only implemented for the default constructor and the destructor, which are the easier cases.
The copy-constructor and the copy-assignment operator cases will be implemented later.
I applied this check to the llvm code base and found 627 warnings (385 in llvm, 9 in compiler-rt, 220 in clang and 13 in clang-tools-extra).
Applying the fixes didn't break any build or test, it only caused a -Wpedantic warning in lib/Target/Mips/MipsOptionRecord.h:33 becaused it replaced
virtual ~MipsOptionRecord(){}; to virtual ~MipsOptionRecord()= default;;
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: george.burgess.iv, Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13871
llvm-svn: 250897
Summary: modernize-make-unique now correctly supports the different kinds of list initialization.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13590
llvm-svn: 250283
Summary: Add the second template argument to the unique_ptr mock, and update the matcher so that it only matches against cases where the second argument is the default.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13433
llvm-svn: 249305
Summary: Now that we prioritize copying trivial types over using const-references where possible, I found some cases where, after the transformation, the loop was using the address of the local copy instead of the original object.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13431
llvm-svn: 249300
Summary:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24960
modernize-use-nullptr would hit an assertion in some cases involving macros and initializer lists, due to finding a node with more than one parent (the two forms of the initializer list).
However, this doesn't mean that the replacement is incorrect, so instead of just rejecting this case I tried to find a way to make it work. Looking at the semantic form of the InitListExpr made sense to me (looking at both forms results in false negatives) but I am not sure of the things that we can miss by skipping the syntactic form.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13246
llvm-svn: 249291
Summary:
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22196 .
Also add a non-trivially copyable type to fix some tests that were meant to be about using const-refs, but were changed in r248438.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13292
llvm-svn: 248994
Summary: create a check that replaces 'std::unique_ptr<type>(new type(args...))' with 'std::make_unique<type>(args...)'. It was on the list of "Ideas for new Tools". It needs to be tested more carefully, but first I wanted to know if you think it is worth the effort.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13166
llvm-svn: 248785
Summary: Add an option to specify wich style must be followed when choosing the new index name.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13052
llvm-svn: 248517
Previously, we would rewrite:
void f(const vector<int> &v) {
for (size_t i = 0; i < v.size(); ++i) {
to
for (const auto &elem : v) {
Now we rewrite it to:
for (auto elem : v) {
(and similarly for iterator based loops).
llvm-svn: 248438
Haojian Wu