context. This happens fairly rarely (which is why we got away with
this bug). Fixes PR6184, where we skipped over the template parameter
scope while tentatively parsing.
llvm-svn: 95376
following it. However, the EmitGlobalConstant method wasn't emitting a body for
the constant. The assembler doesn't like that. Before, we were generating this:
.zerofill __DATA, __common, __cmd, 1, 3
This fix puts us back to that semantic.
llvm-svn: 95336
short-circuited conditions to AND/OR expressions, and those expressions
are often converted back to a short-circuited form in code gen. The
original source order may have been optimized to take advantage of the
expected values, and if we reassociate them, we change the order and
subvert that optimization. Radar 7497329.
llvm-svn: 95333
of a C++ record. Exposed a lot of problems where various routines were
silently doing The Wrong Thing (or The Acceptable Thing in The Wrong Order)
when presented with a non-definition. Also cuts down on memory usage.
llvm-svn: 95330
Instruction selection for X86 now can choose an instruction
sequence that will fit any address of any symbol, no matter
the pointer width. X86-64 uses a mov+call-via-reg sequence
for this.
llvm-svn: 95323
This makes the inliner about as agressive as it was before my changes to the
inliner cost calculations. These levels give the same performance and slightly
smaller code than before.
llvm-svn: 95320
ton of potential crashes of the same kind. The fundamental problem is
that type creation was following a dangerous pattern when using its
FoldingSets:
1) Use FindNodeOrInsertPos to see if the type is available
2) If not, and we aren't looking at a canonical type, build the
canonical type
3) Build and insert the new node into the FoldingSet
The problem here is that building the canonical type can, in very rare
circumstances, force the hash table inside the FoldingSet to
reallocate. That invalidates the insertion position we computed in
step 1, and in step 3 we end up inserting the new node into the wrong
place. BOOM!
I've audited all of ASTContext, fixing this problem everywhere I found
it. The vast majority of wrong code was C++-specific (and *ahem*
written by me), so I also audited other major folding sets in the C++
code (e.g., template specializations), but found no other instances of
this problem.
llvm-svn: 95315
With this fix, and the other fixes committed today a make check-all with a clang-built LLVM now gives:
Expected Passes : 6933
Expected Failures : 46
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 27
which means that we pass 99.96% of all tests :) The resulting 27 tests are all LLVMC tests and seem to be because of differences in the clang and gcc drivers.
llvm-svn: 95313
template parameter, perform array/function decay (if needed), take the
address of the argument (if needed), perform qualification conversions
(if needed), and remove any top-level cv-qualifiers from the resulting
expression. Fixes PR6226.
llvm-svn: 95309
Douglas Gregor