Resubmit r295336 after the bug with non-zero offset patterns on BE targets is fixed (r296336).
Support {a|s}ext, {a|z|s}ext load nodes as a part of load combine patters.
Reviewed By: filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591
llvm-svn: 296651
Resubmit -r295314 with PowerPC and AMDGPU tests updated.
Support {a|s}ext, {a|z|s}ext load nodes as a part of load combine patters.
Reviewed By: filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591
llvm-svn: 295336
Support {a|s}ext, {a|z|s}ext load nodes as a part of load combine patters.
Reviewed By: filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591
llvm-svn: 295314
If some of the trailing or leading bytes of a load combine pattern are zeroes we can combine the pattern to a load + zext and shift. Currently we don't support it, so the tests check the current codegen without load combine. This change will make the patch to support this kind of combine a bit more clear.
llvm-svn: 294591
Currently we don't support these nodes, so the tests check the current codegen without load combine. This change makes the review of the change to support these nodes more clear.
Separated from https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591 review.
llvm-svn: 294305
The previous patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL289538) got reverted because of a bug. Chandler also requested some changes to the algorithm.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161212/413479.html
This is an updated patch. The key difference is that collectBitProviders (renamed to calculateByteProvider) now collects the origin of one byte, not the whole value. It simplifies the implementation and allows to stop the traversal earlier if we know that the result won't be used.
From the original commit:
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is loaded by several narrow loads and combined by shifts and ors. Fold it into a single load or a load and a bswap if the targets supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *a = ...
i32 val = a[0] | (a[1] << 8) | (a[2] << 16) | (a[3] << 24)
=>
i32 val = *((i32)a)
i8 *a = ...
i32 val = (a[0] << 24) | (a[1] << 16) | (a[2] << 8) | a[3]
=>
i32 val = BSWAP(*((i32)a))
This optimization was discussed on llvm-dev some time ago in "Load combine pass" thread. We came to the conclusion that we want to do this transformation late in the pipeline because in presence of atomic loads load widening is irreversible transformation and it might hinder other optimizations.
Eventually we'd like to support folding patterns like this where the offset has a variable and a constant part:
i32 val = a[i] | (a[i + 1] << 8) | (a[i + 2] << 16) | (a[i + 3] << 24)
Matching the pattern above is easier at SelectionDAG level since address reassociation has already happened and the fact that the loads are adjacent is clear. Understanding that these loads are adjacent at IR level would have involved looking through geps/zexts/adds while looking at the addresses.
The general scheme is to match OR expressions by recursively calculating the origin of individual bytes which constitute the resulting OR value. If all the OR bytes come from memory verify that they are adjacent and match with little or big endian encoding of a wider value. If so and the load of the wider type (and bswap if needed) is allowed by the target generate a load and a bswap if needed.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, filcab, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27861
llvm-svn: 293036
idiom.
r289538: Match load by bytes idiom and fold it into a single load
r289540: Fix a buildbot failure introduced by r289538
r289545: Use more detailed assertion messages in the code ...
r289646: Add a couple of assertions to the load combine code ...
This DAG combine has a bad crash in it that is quite hard to trigger
sadly -- it relies on sneaking code with UB through the SDAG build and
into this particular combine. I've responded to the original commit with
a test case that reproduces it.
However, the code also has other problems that will require substantial
changes to address and so I'm going ahead and reverting it for now. This
should unblock us and perhaps others that are hitting the crash in the
wild and will let a fresh patch with updated approach come in cleanly
afterward.
Sorry for any trouble or disruption!
llvm-svn: 289916
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is loaded by several narrow loads and combined by shifts and ors. Fold it into a single load or a load and a bswap if the targets supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *a = ...
i32 val = a[0] | (a[1] << 8) | (a[2] << 16) | (a[3] << 24)
=>
i32 val = *((i32)a)
i8 *a = ...
i32 val = (a[0] << 24) | (a[1] << 16) | (a[2] << 8) | a[3]
=>
i32 val = BSWAP(*((i32)a))
This optimization was discussed on llvm-dev some time ago in "Load combine pass" thread. We came to the conclusion that we want to do this transformation late in the pipeline because in presence of atomic loads load widening is irreversible transformation and it might hinder other optimizations.
Eventually we'd like to support folding patterns like this where the offset has a variable and a constant part:
i32 val = a[i] | (a[i + 1] << 8) | (a[i + 2] << 16) | (a[i + 3] << 24)
Matching the pattern above is easier at SelectionDAG level since address reassociation has already happened and the fact that the loads are adjacent is clear. Understanding that these loads are adjacent at IR level would have involved looking through geps/zexts/adds while looking at the addresses.
The general scheme is to match OR expressions by recursively calculating the origin of individual bits which constitute the resulting OR value. If all the OR bits come from memory verify that they are adjacent and match with little or big endian encoding of a wider value. If so and the load of the wider type (and bswap if needed) is allowed by the target generate a load and a bswap if needed.
Reviewed By: hfinkel, RKSimon, filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26149
llvm-svn: 289538
Artur Pilipenko