the no-arguments case. Don't expand this to an __attribute__((nonnull(A, B,
C))) attribute, since that does the wrong thing for function templates and
varargs functions.
In passing, fix a grammar error in the diagnostic, a crash if
__attribute__((nonnull(N))) is applied to a varargs function,
a bug where the same null argument could be diagnosed multiple
times if there were multiple nonnull attributes referring to it,
and a bug where nonnull attributes would not be accumulated correctly
across redeclarations.
llvm-svn: 216520
The ObjCDealloc checker is currently disabled because it was too aggressive, but this
is a good first step in getting it back to a useful state.
Patch by David Kilzer!
llvm-svn: 216272
Yet more problems due to the missing CXXBindTemporaryExpr in the CFG for
default arguments.
Unfortunately we cannot just switch off inserting temporaries for the
corresponding default arguments, as that breaks existing tests
(test/SemaCXX/return-noreturn.cpp:245).
llvm-svn: 215554
In cases like:
struct C { ~C(); }
void f(C c = C());
void t() {
f();
}
We currently do not add the CXXBindTemporaryExpr for the temporary (the
code mentions that as the default parameter expressions are owned by
the declaration, we'd otherwise add the same expression multiple times),
but we add the temporary destructor pointing to the CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
We need to fix that before we can re-enable the assertion.
llvm-svn: 215357
After post-commit review and community discussion, this seems like a
reasonable direction to continue, making ownership semantics explicit in
the source using the type system.
llvm-svn: 215323
Summary: I was going to fix the use of raw pointer ownership in "takeGraph" when I realized that function was unused and the whole ExplodedGraph could just be owned by value without the std::unique_ptr indirection at all.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4833
llvm-svn: 215257
Changes to the original patch:
- model the CFG for temporary destructors in conditional operators so that
the destructors of the true and false branch are always exclusive. This
is necessary because we must not have impossible paths for the path
based analysis to work.
- add multiple regression tests with ternary operators
Original description:
Fix modelling of non-lifetime-extended temporary destructors in the
analyzer.
Changes to the CFG:
When creating the CFG for temporary destructors, we create a structure
that mirrors the branch structure of the conditionally executed
temporary constructors in a full expression.
The branches we create use a CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator which
corresponds to the temporary constructor which must have been executed
to enter the destruction branch.
2. Changes to the Analyzer:
When we visit a CXXBindTemporaryExpr we mark the CXXBindTemporaryExpr as
executed in the state; when we reach a branch that contains the
corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator, we branch out
depending on whether the corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr was marked
as executed.
llvm-svn: 215096
This reverts commit r214962 because after the change the
following code doesn't compile with -Wreturn-type -Werror.
#include <cstdlib>
class NoReturn {
public:
~NoReturn() __attribute__((noreturn)) { exit(1); }
};
int check() {
true ? NoReturn() : NoReturn();
}
llvm-svn: 214998
1. Changes to the CFG:
When creating the CFG for temporary destructors, we create a structure
that mirrors the branch structure of the conditionally executed
temporary constructors in a full expression.
The branches we create use a CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator which
corresponds to the temporary constructor which must have been executed
to enter the destruction branch.
2. Changes to the Analyzer:
When we visit a CXXBindTemporaryExpr we mark the CXXBindTemporaryExpr as
executed in the state; when we reach a branch that contains the
corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator, we branch out
depending on whether the corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr was marked
as executed.
llvm-svn: 214962
It's also possible to just write "= nullptr", but there's some question
of whether that's as readable, so I leave it up to authors to pick which
they prefer for now. If we want to discuss standardizing on one or the
other, we can do that at some point in the future.
llvm-svn: 213439
This reverts commit r213307.
Reverting to have some on-list discussion/confirmation about the ongoing
direction of smart pointer usage in the LLVM project.
llvm-svn: 213325
(after fixing a bug in MultiplexConsumer I noticed the ownership of the
nested consumers was implemented with raw pointers - so this fixes
that... and follows the source back to its origin pushing unique_ptr
ownership up through there too)
llvm-svn: 213307
The rewrite facility's footprint is small so it's not worth going to these
lengths to support disabling at configure time, particularly since key compiler
features now depend on it.
Meanwhile the Objective-C rewriters have been moved under the
ENABLE_CLANG_ARCMT umbrella for now as they're comparatively heavy and still
potentially worth excluding from lightweight builds.
Tests are now passing with any combination of feature flags. The flags
historically haven't been tested by LLVM's build servers so caveat emptor.
llvm-svn: 213171
This new checker, alpha.core.TestAfterDivZero, catches issues like this:
int sum = ...
int avg = sum / count; // potential division by zero...
if (count == 0) { ... } // ...caught here
Because the analyzer does not necessarily explore /all/ paths through a program,
this check is restricted to only work on zero checks that immediately follow a
division operation (/ % /= %=). This could later be expanded to handle checks
dominated by a division operation but not necessarily in the same CFG block.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm! (with very minor modifications by me)
llvm-svn: 212731
This silences false positives (leaks, use of uninitialized value) in simple
code that uses containers such as std::vector and std::list. The analyzer
cannot reason about the internal invariances of those data structures which
leads to false positives. Until we come up with a better solution to that
problem, let's just not inline the methods of the containers and allow objects
to escape whenever such methods are called.
This just extends an already existing flag "c++-container-inlining" and applies
the heuristic not only to constructors and destructors of the containers, but
to all of their methods.
We have a bunch of distinct user reports all related to this issue
(radar://16058651, radar://16580751, radar://16384286, radar://16795491
[PR19637]).
llvm-svn: 211832
Doing this caused us to mistakenly think we'd seen a particular state before
when we actually hadn't, which resulted in false negatives. Credit to
Rafael Auler for discovering this issue!
llvm-svn: 211209
Richard Smith