Summary:
A range-for was added in r361647 where the range variable was only used in an
assertion. As a result, it warned for Release builds. This revision
restructures the assertion to avoid the problem.
Patch by Yitzhak Mandelbaum.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62412
llvm-svn: 361749
Summary:
In general, the `Explanation` field is optional in `RewriteRule` cases. But,
because the primary purpose of clang-tidy checks is to provide users with
diagnostics, we assume that a missing explanation is a bug. This change adds an
assertion that checks all cases for an explanation, and updates the code to rely
on that assertion correspondingly.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62340
llvm-svn: 361647
This revision introduces an adaptor from Transformer's rewrite rules
(`clang::tooling::RewriteRule`) to `ClangTidyCheck`. For example, given a
RewriteRule `MyCheckAsRewriteRule`, it lets one define a tidy check as follows:
```
class MyTidyCheck : public TransformerClangTidyCheck {
public:
MyTidyCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
: TransformerClangTidyCheck(MyCheckAsRewriteRule, Name, Context) {}
};
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61386
llvm-svn: 361418
Summary:
Finally, we are here!
Analyzes OpenMP Structured Blocks and checks that no exception escapes
out of the Structured Block it was thrown in.
As per the OpenMP specification, structured block is an executable statement,
possibly compound, with a single entry at the top and a single exit at the
bottom. Which means, ``throw`` may not be used to to 'exit' out of the
structured block. If an exception is not caught in the same structured block
it was thrown in, the behaviour is undefined / implementation defined,
the program will likely terminate.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, baloghadamsoftware, gribozavr
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, guansong, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, ABataev
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59466
llvm-svn: 356802
Summary:
D59466 wants to analyse the `Stmt`, and `ExceptionEscapeCheck` does not
have that as a possible entry point.
This simplifies addition of `Stmt` analysis entry point.
Reviewers: baloghadamsoftware, JonasToth, gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59650
llvm-svn: 356799
Summary:
The analsis on the throwing behvaiour on functions and statements gave only
a binary answer whether an exception could occur and if yes which types are
thrown.
This refactoring allows keeping track if there is a unknown factor, because the
code calls to some functions with unavailable source code with no `noexcept`
information.
This 'potential Unknown' information is propagated properly and can be queried
separately.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman, baloghadamsoftware, alexfh
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, baloghadamsoftware
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57883
llvm-svn: 354517
Summary:
The check `bugprone-exception-escape` does an AST-based analysis to determine
if a function might throw an exception and warns based on that information.
The analysis part is refactored into a standalone class similiar to
`ExprMutAnalyzer` that is generally useful.
I intent to use that class in a new check to automatically introduce `noexcept`
if possible.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57100
llvm-svn: 352741
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This check flags function top-level const-qualified return types and suggests removing the mostly-superfluous const qualifier where possible.
Patch by Yitzhak Mandelbaum.
llvm-svn: 345764
Summary:
This patch introduces a new clang-tidy check that matches on all `declStmt` that declare more then one variable
and transform them into one statement per declaration if possible.
It currently only focusses on variable declarations but should be extended to cover more kinds of declarations in the future.
It is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D27621 and does use it's extensive test-suite. Thank you to firolino for his work!
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, kbobyrev
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: ZaMaZaN4iK, mgehre, nemanjai, kbarton, lebedev.ri, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51949
llvm-svn: 345735
Summary:
Detects when the integral literal or floating point (decimal or hexadecimal)
literal has non-uppercase suffix, and suggests to make the suffix uppercase,
with fix-it.
All valid combinations of suffixes are supported.
```
auto x = 1; // OK, no suffix.
auto x = 1u; // warning: integer literal suffix 'u' is not upper-case
auto x = 1U; // OK, suffix is uppercase.
...
```
This is a re-commit, the original was reverted by me in
rL345305 due to discovered bugs. (implicit code, template instantiation)
Tests were added, and the bugs were fixed.
I'm unable to find any further bugs, hopefully there aren't any..
References:
* [[ https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=87152241 | CERT DCL16-C ]]
* MISRA C:2012, 7.3 - The lowercase character "l" shall not be used in a literal suffix
* MISRA C++:2008, 2-13-4 - Literal suffixes shall be upper case
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670
llvm-svn: 345381
There are some lurking issues with the handling of the SourceManager.
Somehow sometimes we end up extracting completely wrong
portions of the source buffer.
Reverts r344772, r44760, r344758, r344755.
llvm-svn: 345305
Summary:
Detects when the integral literal or floating point (decimal or hexadecimal)
literal has non-uppercase suffix, and suggests to make the suffix uppercase,
with fix-it.
All valid combinations of suffixes are supported.
```
auto x = 1; // OK, no suffix.
auto x = 1u; // warning: integer literal suffix 'u' is not upper-case
auto x = 1U; // OK, suffix is uppercase.
...
```
References:
* [[ https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=87152241 | CERT DCL16-C ]]
* MISRA C:2012, 7.3 - The lowercase character "l" shall not be used in a literal suffix
* MISRA C++:2008, 2-13-4 - Literal suffixes shall be upper case
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670
llvm-svn: 344755
New option added to these three checks to be able to silence false positives on
types that are intentionally passed by value or copied. Such types are e.g.
intrusive reference counting pointer types like llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr. The
new option is named WhiteListTypes and can contain a semicolon-separated list of
names of these types. Regular expressions are allowed. Default is empty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52727
llvm-svn: 344340
Summary:
This patch is a small refactoring necessary for
'readability-isolate-declaration' and does not introduce functional changes.
It allows to use the utility functions without a full `ASTContext` and requires only the `SourceManager` and the `LangOpts`.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52684
llvm-svn: 343850
Summary:
Before this fix, the bugprone-use-after-move check could incorrectly
conclude that a use and move in a function template were not sequenced.
For details, see
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39149
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52782
llvm-svn: 343768
Summary:
This is 2/2 of moving ExprMutationAnalyzer from clangtidy to clang/Analysis.
ExprMutationAnalyzer is moved to clang/Analysis in D51948.
This diff migrates existing usages within clangtidy to point to the new
location and remove the old copy of ExprMutationAnalyzer.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, JonasToth
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov
Subscribers: mgorny, a.sidorin, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51950
llvm-svn: 342006
Summary:
This handles cases like this:
```
typedef int& IntRef;
void mutate(IntRef);
void f() {
int x;
mutate(x);
}
```
where the param type is a sugared type (`TypedefType`) instead of a
reference type directly.
Note that another category of similar but different cases are already
handled properly before:
```
typedef int Int;
void mutate(Int&);
void f() {
int x;
mutate(x);
}
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, a.sidorin, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50953
llvm-svn: 341986
Summary:
For smart pointers like std::unique_ptr which uniquely owns the
underlying object, treat the mutation of the pointee as mutation of the
smart pointer itself.
This gives better behavior for cases like this:
```
void f(std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Foo>> v) { // undesirable analyze result of `v` as not mutated.
for (auto& p : v) {
p->mutate(); // only const member function `operator->` is invoked on `p`
}
}
```
Reviewers: hokein, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, a.sidorin, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50883
llvm-svn: 341967
This is the same as D50619 plus fixes for buildbot failures on windows.
The test failures on windows are caused by -fdelayed-template-parsing
and is fixed by forcing -fno-delayed-template-parsing on test cases that
requires AST for uninstantiated templates.
llvm-svn: 341891
Summary:
I have hit this the rough way, while trying to use this in D51870.
There is no particular point in storing the pointers, and moreover
the pointers are assumed to be non-null, and that assumption is not
enforced. If they are null, it won't be able to do anything good
with them anyway.
Initially i thought about simply adding asserts() that they are
not null, but taking/storing references looks like even cleaner solution?
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38888 | PR38888 ]]
Reviewers: JonasToth, shuaiwang, alexfh, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: shuaiwang
Subscribers: xazax.hun, a.sidorin, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51884
llvm-svn: 341854
Summary:
- If a function is unresolved, assume it mutates its arguments
- Follow unresolved member expressions for nested mutations
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50619
llvm-svn: 341848
Summary:
(Originally started as a clang-tidy check but there's already D45444 so shifted to just adding ExprMutationAnalyzer)
`ExprMutationAnalyzer` is a generally useful helper that can be used in different clang-tidy checks for checking whether a given expression is (potentially) mutated within a statement (typically the enclosing compound statement.)
This is a more general and more powerful/accurate version of isOnlyUsedAsConst, which is used in ForRangeCopyCheck, UnnecessaryCopyInitialization.
It should also be possible to construct checks like D45444 (suggest adding const to variable declaration) or https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21981 (suggest adding const to member function) using this helper function.
This function is tested by itself and is intended to stay generally useful instead of tied to any particular check.
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh, aaron.ballman, ilya-biryukov, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, shuaiwang, rnkovacs, hokein, alexfh, aaron.ballman, a.sidorin, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, JonasToth, klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Shuai Wang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45679
llvm-svn: 335736
ExprMutationAnalyzer is a generally useful helper that can be used in different clang-tidy checks for checking whether a given expression is (potentially) mutated within a statement (typically the enclosing compound statement.) This is a more general and more powerful/accurate version of isOnlyUsedAsConst, which is used in ForRangeCopyCheck, UnnecessaryCopyInitialization.
Patch by Shuai Wang
llvm-svn: 334604
This commit relands r331905.
r331904 added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
llvm-svn: 332023
[revision] added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46615
llvm-svn: 331905
Summary:
The following Objective-C code currently incorrectly triggers
clang-tidy's performance-unnecessary-value-param check:
```
% cat /tmp/performance-unnecessary-value-param-arc.m
void foo(id object) { }
clang-tidy /tmp/performance-unnecessary-value-param-arc.m
-checks=-\*,performance-unnecessary-value-param -- -xobjective-c
-fobjc-abi-version=2 -fobjc-arc
1 warning generated.
/src/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/performance-unnecessary-value-param-arc.m:10:13:
warning: the parameter 'object' is copied for each invocation but only
used as a const reference; consider making it a const reference
[performance-unnecessary-value-param]
void foo(id object) { }
~~ ^
const &
```
This is wrong for a few reasons:
1) Objective-C doesn't have references, so `const &` is not going to help
2) ARC heavily optimizes the "expensive" copy which triggers the warning
This fixes the issue by disabling the warning for non-C++, as well as
disabling it for objects under ARC memory management for
Objective-C++.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32075
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with `make -j12 check-clang-tools`.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: stephanemoore, klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, Wizard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42812
llvm-svn: 324097
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Codereview in D36354
llvm-svn: 313067
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Please give your comments :)
llvm-svn: 313043
Summary: socket() is better to include SOCK_CLOEXEC in its type argument to avoid the file descriptor leakage.
Reviewers: chh, Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: chh, alexfh
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34913
llvm-svn: 307818
The check doesn't really know if the code it is warning about came before
or after the header guard, so phrase it more neutral instead of complaining
about code before the header guard. The location for the warning is still
not optimal, but I don't think fixing that is worth the effort, the
preprocessor doesn't give us a better location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30191
llvm-svn: 295715
Haojian Wu