Commit Graph

30 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Reid Kleckner 0828699488 [FastISel] Disable local value sinking by default
This is causing compilation timeouts on code with long sequences of
local values and calls (i.e. foo(1); foo(2); foo(3); ...).  It turns out
that code coverage instrumentation is a great way to create sequences
like this, which how our users ran into the issue in practice.

Intel has a tool that detects these kinds of non-linear compile time
issues, and Andy Kaylor reported it as PR37010.

The current sinking code scans the whole basic block once per local
value sink, which happens before emitting each call. In theory, local
values should only be introduced to be used by instructions between the
current flush point and the last flush point, so we should only need to
scan those instructions.

llvm-svn: 329822
2018-04-11 16:03:07 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 3a7a2e4a0a [FastISel] Sink local value materializations to first use
Summary:
Local values are constants, global addresses, and stack addresses that
can't be folded into the instruction that uses them. For example, when
storing the address of a global variable into memory, we need to
materialize that address into a register.

FastISel doesn't want to materialize any given local value more than
once, so it generates all local value materialization code at
EmitStartPt, which always dominates the current insertion point. This
allows it to maintain a map of local value registers, and it knows that
the local value area will always dominate the current insertion point.

The downside is that local value instructions are always emitted without
a source location. This is done to prevent jumpy line tables, but it
means that the local value area will be considered part of the previous
statement. Consider this C code:
  call1();      // line 1
  ++global;     // line 2
  ++global;     // line 3
  call2(&global, &local); // line 4

Today we end up with assembly and line tables like this:
  .loc 1 1
  callq call1
  leaq global(%rip), %rdi
  leaq local(%rsp), %rsi
  .loc 1 2
  addq $1, global(%rip)
  .loc 1 3
  addq $1, global(%rip)
  .loc 1 4
  callq call2

The LEA instructions in the local value area have no source location and
are treated as being on line 1. Stepping through the code in a debugger
and correlating it with the assembly won't make much sense, because
these materializations are only required for line 4.

This is actually problematic for the VS debugger "set next statement"
feature, which effectively assumes that there are no registers live
across statement boundaries. By sinking the local value code into the
statement and fixing up the source location, we can make that feature
work. This was filed as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35975 and
https://crbug.com/793819.

This change is obviously not enough to make this feature work reliably
in all cases, but I felt that it was worth doing anyway because it
usually generates smaller, more comprehensible -O0 code. I measured a
0.12% regression in code generation time with LLC on the sqlite3
amalgamation, so I think this is worth doing.

There are some special cases worth calling out in the commit message:
1. local values materialized for phis
2. local values used by no-op casts
3. dead local value code

Local values can be materialized for phis, and this does not show up as
a vreg use in MachineRegisterInfo. In this case, if there are no other
uses, this patch sinks the value to the first terminator, EH label, or
the end of the BB if nothing else exists.

Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the register to
the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups map direction, we
don't have enough information to sink these instructions.

Lastly, if the local value register has no other uses, we can delete it.
This comes up when fastisel tries two instruction selection approaches
and the first materializes the value but fails and the second succeeds
without using the local value.

Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, qcolombet, MatzeB, vsk, echristo

Subscribers: dotdash, chandlerc, hans, sdardis, amccarth, javed.absar, zturner, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093

llvm-svn: 327581
2018-03-14 21:54:21 +00:00
Geoff Berry a2b9011290 Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
Re-enable commit r323991 now that r325931 has been committed to make
MachineOperand::isRenamable() check more conservative w.r.t. code
changes and opt-in on a per-target basis.

llvm-svn: 326208
2018-02-27 16:59:10 +00:00
Quentin Colombet 48abac82b8 Revert "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
This reverts commit r323991.

This commit breaks target that don't model all the register constraints
in TableGen. So far the workaround was to set the
hasExtraXXXRegAllocReq, but it proves that it doesn't cover all the
cases.
For instance, when mutating an instruction (like in the lowering of
COPYs) the isRenamable flag is not properly updated. The same problem
will happen when attaching machine operand from one instruction to
another.

Geoff Berry is working on a fix in https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042.

llvm-svn: 325421
2018-02-17 03:05:33 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson 995ba6e42c [ARM] Return true in enableMultipleCopyHints().
Enable multiple COPY hints to eliminate more COPYs during register allocation.

Note that this is something all targets should do, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128.

Review: Eli Friedman
llvm-svn: 325327
2018-02-16 09:51:01 +00:00
Geoff Berry 94503c7bc3 [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
Summary:
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding
and adds an additional run of the pass to the default pass pipeline just
after register allocation.

This version of this patch uses the newly added
MachineOperand::isRenamable bit to avoid forwarding registers is such a
way as to violate constraints that aren't captured in the
Machine IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).

This change is a continuation of the work started in D30751.

Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa, tstellar

Subscribers: tpr, mgorny, mcrosier, nhaehnle, nemanjai, jyknight, hfinkel, arsenm, inouehrs, eraman, sdardis, guyblank, fedor.sergeev, aheejin, dschuff, jfb, myatsina, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41835

llvm-svn: 323991
2018-02-01 18:54:01 +00:00
Geoff Berry fabedbad11 Revert "Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding""
This reverts commit r314729.

Another bug has been encountered in an out-of-tree target reported by Quentin.

llvm-svn: 314814
2017-10-03 16:59:13 +00:00
Geoff Berry bfc5fb4571 Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
Issues addressed since original review:
- Avoid bug in regalloc greedy/machine verifier when forwarding to use
  in an instruction that re-defines the same virtual register.
- Fixed bug when forwarding to use in EarlyClobber instruction slot.
- Fixed incorrect forwarding to register definitions that showed up in
  explicit_uses() iterator (e.g. in INLINEASM).
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
  LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
  instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
  iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
  doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
  register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
  can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
  end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).

  [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding

  This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.

  This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
  be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
  assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
  allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
  through the forwarding of all of their uses.

llvm-svn: 314729
2017-10-02 22:01:37 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer ae4de58a5b ARM: Use the proper swifterror CSR list on platforms other than darwin
Noticed by inspection

llvm-svn: 314121
2017-09-25 17:19:50 +00:00
Sam McCall f71bb198ed Revert "Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding""
This crashes on boringSSL on PPC (will send reduced testcase)

This reverts commit r312328.

llvm-svn: 312490
2017-09-04 15:47:00 +00:00
Geoff Berry 65528f2991 Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
Issues addressed since original review:
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
  LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
  instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
  iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
  doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
  register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
  can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
  end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).

  [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding

  This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.

  This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
  be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
  assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
  allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
  through the forwarding of all of their uses.

llvm-svn: 312328
2017-09-01 14:27:20 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 24775a0a6c Revert r312154 "Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding""
It caused PR34387: Assertion failed: (RegNo < NumRegs && "Attempting to access record for invalid register number!")

> Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
> - Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
>   doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
>   register number of the use.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
>   can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
>   end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
>
>   [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
>
>   This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
>
>   This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
>   be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
>   assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
>   allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
>   through the forwarding of all of their uses.

llvm-svn: 312178
2017-08-30 22:11:37 +00:00
Brian Gesiak 3332976478 [ARM] Use Swift error registers on non-Darwin targets
Summary:
Remove a check for `ARMSubtarget::isTargetDarwin` when determining
whether to use Swift error registers, so that Swift errors work
properly on non-Darwin ARM32 targets (specifically Android).

Before this patch, generated code would save and restores ARM register r8 at
the entry and returns of a function that throws. As r8 is used as a virtual
return value for the object being thrown, this gets overwritten by the restore,
and calling code is unable to catch the error. In turn this caused Swift code
that used `do`/`try`/`catch` to work improperly on Android ARM32 targets.

Addresses Swift bug report https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5438.

Patch by John Holdsworth.

Reviewers: manmanren, rjmccall, aschwaighofer

Reviewed By: aschwaighofer

Subscribers: srhines, aschwaighofer, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35835

llvm-svn: 312164
2017-08-30 20:03:54 +00:00
Geoff Berry feffb0c8af Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
  doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
  register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
  can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
  end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).

  [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding

  This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.

  This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
  be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
  assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
  allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
  through the forwarding of all of their uses.

llvm-svn: 312154
2017-08-30 18:41:07 +00:00
Geoff Berry bd47e8a4f7 Revert "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding" round 2
This reverts commit r311135.

sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android buildbot is timing out with just this
patch applied.

llvm-svn: 311142
2017-08-18 01:43:11 +00:00
Geoff Berry 51f52c4fca Re-enable "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
Two issues identified by buildbots were addressed:
    - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
      doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
      register number of the use.
    - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
      can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
      end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).

    [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding

    This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.

    This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
    be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
    assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
    allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
    through the forwarding of all of their uses.

    Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa

    Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751

llvm-svn: 311135
2017-08-17 23:06:55 +00:00
Geoff Berry 4e38e02e6f Revert "[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding"
This reverts commit r311038.

Several buildbots are breaking, and at least one appears to be due to
the forwarding of physical regs enabled by this change.  Reverting while
I investigate further.

llvm-svn: 311062
2017-08-17 04:04:11 +00:00
Geoff Berry 87f8d25150 [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.

This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.

Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa

Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751

llvm-svn: 311038
2017-08-16 20:50:01 +00:00
Kristof Beyls eecb353d0e [ARM] Make -mcpu=generic schedule for an in-order core (Cortex-A8).
The benchmarking summarized in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/113525.html showed
this is beneficial for a wide range of cores.

As is to be expected, quite a few small adaptations are needed to the
regressions tests, as the difference in scheduling results in:
- Quite a few small instruction schedule differences.
- A few changes in register allocation decisions caused by different
 instruction schedules.
- A few changes in IfConversion decisions, due to a difference in
 instruction schedule and/or the estimated cost of a branch mispredict.

llvm-svn: 306514
2017-06-28 07:07:03 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer ae9312c487 ISel: Fix FastISel of swifterror values
The code assumed that we process instructions in basic block order.  FastISel
processes instructions in reverse basic block order. We need to pre-assign
virtual registers before selecting otherwise we get def-use relationships wrong.

This only affects code with swifterror registers.

rdar://32659327

llvm-svn: 305484
2017-06-15 17:34:42 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer 8f3df731dc swiftcc: Don't emit tail calls from callers with swifterror parameters
Backends don't support this yet. They would have to move to the swifterror
register before the tail call to make sure it is live-in to the call.

rdar://30495920

llvm-svn: 294982
2017-02-13 19:58:28 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer 26f016f143 SwiftCC: swifterror register cannot be as the base register
Functions that have a dynamic alloca require a base register which is defined to
be X19 on AArch64 and r6 on ARM.  We have defined the swifterror register to be
the same register. Use a different callee save register for swifterror instead:

 X21 on AArch64
 R8 on ARM

rdar://30433803

llvm-svn: 294551
2017-02-09 01:52:17 +00:00
Tim Northover 46a6f0fbf0 Recommit: ARM: sort register lists by encoding in push/pop instructions.
For example we were producing

    push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}

This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.

Fixed usage of std::sort so that we (hopefully) use instantiations that
actually exist in GCC 4.8.

llvm-svn: 286881
2016-11-14 20:28:24 +00:00
Tim Northover 1b66f39cf2 Revert "ARM: sort register lists by encoding in push/pop instructions."
This reverts commit 286866. It broke a bot, something to do with exactly which
templates std::sort accepts.

llvm-svn: 286867
2016-11-14 19:05:28 +00:00
Tim Northover e908ea844c ARM: sort register lists by encoding in push/pop instructions.
For example we were producing

    push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}

This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.

llvm-svn: 286866
2016-11-14 19:02:17 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer 6200b2b67e Make swift calling convention test specific to armv7
llvm-svn: 285431
2016-10-28 19:18:09 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer 7f4b31c057 More swift calling convention tests
llvm-svn: 285417
2016-10-28 17:21:05 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer 3f25658143 swifterror: Don't compute swifterror vregs during instruction selection
The code used llvm basic block predecessors to decided where to insert phi
nodes. Instruction selection can and will liberally insert new machine basic
block predecessors. There is not a guaranteed one-to-one mapping from pred.
llvm basic blocks and machine basic blocks.

Therefore the current approach does not work as it assumes we can mark
predecessor machine basic block as needing a copy, and needs to know the set of
all predecessor machine basic blocks to decide when to insert phis.

Instead of computing the swifterror vregs as we select instructions, propagate
them at the end of instruction selection when the MBB CFG is complete.

When an instruction needs a swifterror vreg and we don't know the value yet,
generate a new vreg and remember this "upward exposed" use, and reconcile this
at the end of instruction selection.

This will only happen if the target supports promoting swifterror parameters to
registers and the swifterror attribute is used.

rdar://28300923

llvm-svn: 283617
2016-10-07 22:06:55 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer de2490d0dc Disable tail calls if there is an swifterror argument
ISel does not handle them correctly yet i.e we crash trying to emit tail call
code.

radar://28407842

llvm-svn: 282088
2016-09-21 16:53:36 +00:00
Manman Ren 5751814eda Swift Calling Convention: swifterror target support.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18716

llvm-svn: 265997
2016-04-11 21:08:06 +00:00