We add CHECK lines to this test case to make it easier to see the difference
between affine and non-affine memory accesses. We also change the test case to
use a parameteric index expression as otherwise our range analysis will
understand that the non-affine memory access can only access input[1],
which makes it difficult to see that the memory access is in-fact modeled as
non-affine access.
llvm-svn: 287623
In r248701 "Allow switch instructions in SCoPs" support for switch statements
has been introduced, but support for switch statements in loop latches was
incomplete. This change completely disables switch statements in loop latches.
The original commit changed addLoopBoundsToHeaderDomain to support non-branch
terminator instructions, but this change was incorrect: it added a check for
BI != null to the if-branch of a condition, but BI was used in the else branch
es well. As a result, when a non-branch terminator instruction is encounted a
nullptr dereference is triggered. Due to missing test coverage, this bug was
overlooked.
r249273 "[FIX] Approximate non-affine loops correctly" added code to disallow
switch statements for non-affine loops, if they appear in either a loop latch
or a loop exit. We adapt this code to now prohibit switch statements in
loop latches even if the control condition is affine.
We could possibly add support for switch statements in loop latches, but such
support should be evaluated and tested separately.
This fixes llvm.org/PR30952
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286426
Regions with one affine loop can be profitable if the loop is
distributable. To this end we will allow them to be treated as
profitable if they contain at least two non-trivial basic blocks.
llvm-svn: 269064
This might be useful to evaluate the benefit of us handling modref funciton
calls. Also, a new bug that was triggered by modref function calls was
recently reported http://llvm.org/PR27035. To ensure the same issue does not
cause troubles for other people, we temporarily disable this until the bug
is resolved.
llvm-svn: 264140
Index calculations can use the last value that come out of a loop.
Ideally, ScalarEvolution can compute that exit value directly without
depending on the loop induction variable, but not in all cases.
This changes isAffine to not consider such loop exit values as affine to
avoid that SCEVExpander adds uses of the original loop induction
variable.
This fix is analogous to r262404 that applies to general uses of loop
exit values instead of index expressions and loop bouds as in this
patch.
This reduces the number of LNT test-suite fails with
-polly-position=before-vectorizer -polly-unprofitable
from 10 to 8.
llvm-svn: 262665
Check the ModRefBehaviour of functions in order to decide whether or
not a call instruction might be acceptable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5227
llvm-svn: 261866
If a loop has a sufficiently large amount of compute instruction in its loop
body, it is unlikely that our rewrite of the loop iterators introduces large
performance changes. As Polly can also apply beneficical optimizations (such
as parallelization) to such loop nests, we mark them as profitable.
This option is currently "disabled" by default, but can be used to run
experiments. If enabled by setting it e.g. to 40 instructions, we currently
see some compile-time increases on LNT without any significant run-time
changes.
llvm-svn: 256199
The patch fixes Bug 25759 produced by inappropriate handling of unsigned
maximum SCEV expressions by SCEVRemoveMax. Without a fix, we get an infinite
loop and a segmentation fault, if we try to process, for example,
'((-1 + (-1 * %b1)) umax {(-1 + (-1 * %yStart)),+,-1}<%.preheader>)'.
It also fixes a potential issue related to signed maximum SCEV expressions.
Tested-by: Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com>
Fixed-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15563
llvm-svn: 255922
At some point we enforced lcssa for the loop surrounding the entry block.
This is not only questionable as it does not check any other loop but also
not needed any more.
llvm-svn: 253789
Basic blocks that are always executed can not be error blocks as their execution
can not possibly be an unlikely event. In this commit we tighten the check
if an error block to basic blcoks that do not dominate the exit condition, but
that dominate all exiting blocks of the scop.
llvm-svn: 252726
r252713 introduced a couple of regressions due to later basic blocks refering
to instructions defined in error blocks which have not yet been modeled.
This commit is currently just encoding limitations of our modeling and code
generation backends to ensure correctness. In theory, we should be able to
generate and optimize such regions, as everything that is dominated by an error
region is assumed to not be executed anyhow. We currently just lack the code
to make this happen in practice.
llvm-svn: 252725
Volatile or atomic memory accesses are currently not supported. Neither did
we think about any special handling needed nor do we support the unknown
instructions the alias set tracker turns them into sometimes. Before this
patch, us not supporting unkown instructions in an alias set caused the
following assertion failures:
Assertion `AG.size() > 1 && "Alias groups should contain at least two accesses"'
failed
llvm-svn: 251234
the size expression.
We previously only checked if the size expression is 'undef', but allowed size
expressions of the form 'undef * undef' by accident. After this change we now
require size expressions to be affine which implies no 'undef' appears anywhere
in the expression.
llvm-svn: 251225
This patch allows invariant loads to be used in the SCoP description,
e.g., as loop bounds, conditions or in memory access functions.
First we collect "required invariant loads" during SCoP detection that
would otherwise make an expression we care about non-affine. To this
end a new level of abstraction was introduced before
SCEVValidator::isAffineExpr() namely ScopDetection::isAffine() and
ScopDetection::onlyValidRequiredInvariantLoads(). Here we can decide
if we want a load inside the region to be optimistically assumed
invariant or not. If we do, it will be marked as required and in the
SCoP generation we bail if it is actually not invariant. If we don't
it will be a non-affine expression as before. At the moment we
optimistically assume all "hoistable" (namely non-loop-carried) loads
to be invariant. This causes us to expand some SCoPs and dismiss them
later but it also allows us to detect a lot we would dismiss directly
if we would ask e.g., AliasAnalysis::canBasicBlockModify(). We also
allow potential aliases between optimistically assumed invariant loads
and other pointers as our runtime alias checks are sound in case the
loads are actually invariant. Together with the invariant checks this
combination allows to handle a lot more than LICM can.
The code generation of the invariant loads had to be extended as we
can now have dependences between parameters and invariant (hoisted)
loads as well as the other way around, e.g.,
test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_parameters_cyclic_dependence.ll
First, it is important to note that we cannot have real cycles but
only dependences from a hoisted load to a parameter and from another
parameter to that hoisted load (and so on). To handle such cases we
materialize llvm::Values for parameters that are referred by a hoisted
load on demand and then materialize the remaining parameters. Second,
there are new kinds of dependences between hoisted loads caused by the
constraints on their execution. If a hoisted load is conditionally
executed it might depend on the value of another hoisted load. To deal
with such situations we sort them already in the ScopInfo such that
they can be generated in the order they are listed in the
Scop::InvariantAccesses list (see compareInvariantAccesses). The
dependences between hoisted loads caused by indirect accesses are
handled the same way as before.
llvm-svn: 249607
This single option replaces -polly-detect-unprofitable and -polly-no-early-exit
and is supposed to be the only option that disables compile-time heuristics that
aim to bail out early on scops that are believed to not benefit from Polly
optimizations.
Suggested-by: Johannes Doerfert
llvm-svn: 249426
These flags are now always passed to all tests and need to be disabled if
not needed. Disabling these flags, rather than passing them to almost all
tests, significantly simplfies our RUN: lines.
llvm-svn: 249422
Polly's profitability heuristic saves compile time by skipping trivial scops or
scops were we know no good optimization can be applied. For almost all our tests
this heuristic makes little sense as we aim for minimal test cases when testing
functionality. Hence, in almost all cases this heuristic is better be disabled.
In preparation of disabling Polly's compile time heuristic by default in the
test suite we first explicitly enable it in the couple of test cases that really
use it (or run with/without heuristic side-by-side).
llvm-svn: 249418
Before isValidCFG() could hide the fact that a loop is non-affine by
over-approximation. This is problematic if a subregion of the loop contains
an exit/latch block and is over-approximated. Now we do not over-approximate
in the isValidCFG function if we check loop control. If such control is
non-affine the whole loop is over-approximated, not only a subregion.
llvm-svn: 249273
This check was needed at some point but seems not useful anymore. Only
one adjustment in the domain generation was needed to cope with the
cases this check prevented from happening before.
llvm-svn: 248695
As we currently do not perform any optimizations that targets (or is
even aware) small trip counts we will skip them when we count the
loops in a region.
llvm-svn: 248119
While we do not need to model PHI nodes in the region exit (as it is not part
of the SCoP), we need to prepare for the case that the exit block is split in
code generation to create a single exiting block. If this will happen, hence
if the region did not have a single exiting block before, we will model the
operands of the PHI nodes as escaping scalars in the SCoP.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12051
llvm-svn: 247078
Instead of having two separate options
-polly-detect-scops-in-functions-without-loops and
-polly-detect-scops-in-regions-without-loops we now just use
-polly-detect-unprofitable to force the detection of scops ignoring any compile
time saving bailout heuristics.
llvm-svn: 247057
There is no reason the loops in a region need to touch either entry or exit
block. Hence, we need to look through all loops that may touch the region as
well as their children to understand if our region has at least two loops.
llvm-svn: 246433
I ran the script from r246327 and it touched all the right files;
committing now to hopefully right the bots, but if my check-polly
doesn't come back clean I'll keep looking.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-amd64-linux/builds/33648
llvm-svn: 246341
If a region does not have more than one loop, we do not identify it as
a Scop in ScopDetection. The main optimizations Polly is currently performing
(tiling, preparation for outer-loop vectorization and loop fusion) are unlikely
to have a positive impact on individual loops. In some cases, Polly's run-time
alias checks or conditional hoisting may still have a positive impact, but those
are mostly enabling transformations which LLVM already performs for individual
loops. As we do not focus on individual loops, we leave them untouched to not
introduce compile time regressions and execution time noise. This results in
good compile time reduction (oourafft: -73.99%, smg2000: -56.25%).
Contributed-by: Pratik Bhatu <cs12b1010@iith.ac.in>
Reviewers: grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12268
llvm-svn: 246161
This test was written to check the workings of IndependentBlocks on
arrays which doesn't do such transformations anymore. The test itself
is still useful to check that the region is rejected as SCoP.
llvm-svn: 245353
Such codes are not interesting to optimize and most likely never appear in the
normal compilation flow. However, they show up during test case reduction with
bugpoint and trigger -- without this change -- an assert in
polly::MemoryAccess::foldAccess(). It is better to detect them in
ScopDetection itself and just bail out.
Contributed-by: Utpal Bora <cs14mtech11017@iith.ac.in>
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11425
llvm-svn: 243515
This removes old code that has been disabled since several weeks and was hidden
behind the flags -disable-polly-intra-scop-scalar-to-array=false and
-polly-model-phi-nodes=false. Earlier, Polly used to translate scalars and
PHI nodes to single element arrays, as this avoided the need for their special
handling in Polly. With Johannes' patches adding native support for such scalar
references to Polly, this code is not needed any more. After this commit both
-polly-prepare and -polly-independent are now mostly no-ops. Only a couple of
simple transformations still remain, but they are scheduled for removal too.
Thanks again to Johannes Doerfert for his nice work in making all this code
obsolete.
llvm-svn: 240766
Remainder operations with constant divisor can be modeled as quasi-affine
expression. This patch adds support for detecting and modeling them. We also
add a test that ensures they are correctly code generated.
This patch was extracted from a larger patch contributed by Johannes Doerfert
in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5293
llvm-svn: 240518
This ensures we pass all tests independently of how we set the options
-disable-polly-intra-scop-scalar-to-array and -polly-model-phi-nodes.
(At least if we enable both or disable both. Enabling them individually makes
little sense, as they will hopefully disappear soon anyhow).
llvm-svn: 238087
Besides class, function and file names, we also change the command line option
from -polly-codegen-isl to just -polly-codegen. The isl postfix is a leftover
from the times when we still had the CLooG based -polly-codegen. Today it is
just redundant and we drop it.
llvm-svn: 237099
In the lnt benchmark MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs with
scalar and PHI modeling we detected the multidimensional accesses
with sizes variant in the SCoP. This will check the sizes for validity.
llvm-svn: 236395
Tobias Grosser