Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Renato Golin 049f387112 Revert "[XRay] ARM 32-bit no-Thumb support in LLVM"
And associated commits, as they broke the Thumb bots.

This reverts commit r280935.
This reverts commit r280891.
This reverts commit r280888.

llvm-svn: 280967
2016-09-08 17:10:39 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris cf3801eee8 [XRay] Remove unused variable
llvm-svn: 280891
2016-09-08 00:38:22 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris 17d94e279e [XRay] ARM 32-bit no-Thumb support in LLVM
This is a port of XRay to ARM 32-bit, without Thumb support yet. The XRay instrumentation support is moving up to AsmPrinter.
This is one of 3 commits to different repositories of XRay ARM port. The other 2 are:

1. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23932 (Clang test)
2. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23933 (compiler-rt)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23931

llvm-svn: 280888
2016-09-08 00:19:04 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris e8ae5baaf7 [XRay] Detect and emit sleds for sibling/tail calls
Summary:
This change promotes the 'isTailCall(...)' member function to
TargetInstrInfo as a query interface for determining on a per-target
basis whether a given MachineInstr is a tail call instruction. We build
upon this in the XRay instrumentation pass to emit special sleds for
tail call optimisations, where we emit the correct kind of sled.

The tail call sleds look like a mix between the function entry and
function exit sleds. Form-wise, the sled comes before the "jmp"
instruction that implements the tail call similar to how we do it for
the function entry sled. Functionally, because we know this is a tail
call, it behaves much like an exit sled -- i.e. at runtime we may use
the exit trampolines instead of a different kind of trampoline.

A follow-up change to recognise these sleds will be done in compiler-rt,
so that we can start intercepting these initially as exits, but also
have the option to have different log entries to more accurately reflect
that this is actually a tail call.

Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dberris, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23986

llvm-svn: 280334
2016-09-01 01:29:13 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris 047669f18c [XRay] Support multiple return instructions in a single basic block
Add a .mir test to catch this case, and fix the xray-instrumentation
pass to handle it appropriately.

llvm-svn: 280192
2016-08-31 05:20:08 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris 086639a6d0 Remove extra ';' to appease -Wpedantic
Summary:

Reviewers: dok

Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 275399
2016-07-14 11:46:41 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris 52735fc435 XRay: Add entry and exit sleds
Summary:
In this patch we implement the following parts of XRay:

- Supporting a function attribute named 'function-instrument' which currently only supports 'xray-always'. We should be able to use this attribute for other instrumentation approaches.
- Supporting a function attribute named 'xray-instruction-threshold' used to determine whether a function is instrumented with a minimum number of instructions (IR instruction counts).
- X86-specific nop sleds as described in the white paper.
- A machine function pass that adds the different instrumentation marker instructions at a very late stage.
- A way of identifying which return opcode is considered "normal" for each architecture.

There are some caveats here:

1) We don't handle PATCHABLE_RET in platforms other than x86_64 yet -- this means if IR used PATCHABLE_RET directly instead of a normal ret, instruction lowering for that platform might do the wrong thing. We think this should be handled at instruction selection time to by default be unpacked for platforms where XRay is not availble yet.

2) The generated section for X86 is different from what is described from the white paper for the sole reason that LLVM allows us to do this neatly. We're taking the opportunity to deviate from the white paper from this perspective to allow us to get richer information from the runtime library.

Reviewers: sanjoy, eugenis, kcc, pcc, echristo, rnk

Subscribers: niravd, majnemer, atrick, rnk, emaste, bmakam, mcrosier, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19904

llvm-svn: 275367
2016-07-14 04:06:33 +00:00