There's no need for local symbols to go through the GOT, in fact it seems GNU ld is not even emitting GOT entries for local symbols and will error out when trying to resolve a GOT relocation for a local symbol.
This bug triggers when bootstrapping clang on AArch64 Linux with -fPIC and the ARM64 backend. The AArch64 backend is not affected.
With this commit it's now possible to bootstrap clang on AArch64 Linux with the ARM64 backend (-fPIC, -O3).
llvm-svn: 207226
ARM64 was not producing pure BFI instructions for bitfield insertion
operations, unlike AArch64. The approach had to be a little different (in
ISelDAGToDAG rather than ISelLowering), and the outcomes aren't identical but
hopefully this gives it similar power.
This should address PR19424.
llvm-svn: 207102
ANDS does not use the same encoding scheme as other xxxS instructions (e.g.,
ADDS). Take that into account to avoid wrong peephole optimization.
<rdar://problem/16693089>
llvm-svn: 207020
AArch64 has feature predicates for NEON, FP and CRYPTO instructions.
This allows the compiler to generate code without using FP, NEON
or CRYPTO instructions.
llvm-svn: 206949
while checking candidate for bit field extract.
Otherwise the value may not fit in uint64_t and this will trigger an
assertion.
This fixes PR19503.
llvm-svn: 206834
Summary:
This port includes the rudimentary latencies that were provided for
the Cortex-A53 Machine Model in the AArch64 backend. It also changes
the SchedAlias for COPY in the Cyclone model to an explicit
WriteRes mapping to avoid conflicts in other subtargets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3427
Patch by Dave Estes <cestes@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 206652
Code mostly copied from AArch64, just tidied up a trifle and plumbed
into the ARM64 way of doing things.
This also enables the AArch64 tests which inspired the previous
untested commits.
llvm-svn: 206574
A vector extract followed by a dup can become a single instruction even if the
types don't match. AArch64 handled this in ISelLowering, but a few reasonably
simple patterns can take care of it in TableGen, so that's where I've put it.
llvm-svn: 206573
Change the command line vector-insertion.ll to explicitly set the neon syntax
to apple so that buildbots that default to other syntaxes won't fail.
llvm-svn: 206502
This patch improves the performance of vector creation in caseiswhere where
several of the lanes in the vector are a constant floating point value. It
also includes new patterns to fold together some of the instructions when the
value is 0.0f. Test cases included.
rdar://16349427
llvm-svn: 206496
The commit of r205855:
Author: Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer@apple.com>
Date: Wed Apr 9 14:20:47 2014 +0000
SLPVectorizer: Only vectorize intrinsics whose operands are widened equally
The vectorizer only knows how to vectorize intrinics by widening all operands by
the same factor.
Patch by Tyler Nowicki!
exposed a backend bug causing a regression (Cannot select ctpop).
The commit msg is a bit confusing because the patch actually changes the
behavior for the loop-vectorizer as well. As things got refactored into a
helper ctpop got snuck in to the trivially-vectorizable helper which is now
used by both vectorizers. In other words, we started seeing vector-ctpops in
the backend.
This change makes ctpop LegalizeAction::Expand for the types not supported by
the byte-only CNT instruction. We may be able to custom-lower these later to
a single CNT but this is to fix the compiler crash first.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16578951>
llvm-svn: 206433
These ones used completely different sets of intrinsics, so the only way to do
it is create a separate ARM64 copy and change them all.
Other than that, CodeGen was straightforward, no deficiencies detected here.
llvm-svn: 206392
If we know that a particular 64-bit constant has all high bits zero, then we
can rely on the fact that 32-bit ARM64 instructions automatically zero out the
high bits of an x-register. This gives the expansion logic less constraints to
satisfy and so sometimes allows it to pick better sequences.
Came up while porting test/CodeGen/AArch64/movw-consts.ll: this will allow a
32-bit MOVN to be used in @test8 soon.
llvm-svn: 206379
This particular DAG combine is designed to kick in when both ConstantFPs will
end up being loaded via a litpool, however those nodes have a semi-legal
status, dictated by isFPImmLegal so in some cases there wouldn't have been a
litpool in the first place. Don't try to be clever in those circumstances.
Picked up while merging some AArch64 tests.
llvm-svn: 206365
In rare cases the dead definition elimination pass code can cause illegal cmn
instructions when it replaces dead registers on instructions that use
unmaterialized frame indexes. This patch disables the dead definition
optimization for instructions which include frame index operands.
rdar://16438284
llvm-svn: 206208
The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of
the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this
by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into
IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most
targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of
IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a
problem for two reasons:
1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr
2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used
to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable
all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again)
This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by
default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside
from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in
behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr
sinking on all targets, but further testing is required.
I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the
address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are
sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level).
llvm-svn: 206092
sign/zero/any extensions. However a few places were not checking properly the
property of the load and were turning an indexed load into a regular extended
load. Therefore the indexed value was lost during the process and this was
triggering an assertion.
<rdar://problem/16389332>
llvm-svn: 205923
Tilmann Scheller