This relands commit 4d8d2580c5.
The major change here is using 'addUsedIfAvailable<BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader>()` to make sure we don't change the pipeline tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126518
Today, text section prefixes (none, .unlikely, .hot, and .unkown) are determined based on PGO profile. However, Propeller may deem a function hot when PGO doesn't. Besides, when `-Wl,-keep-text-section-prefix=true` Propeller cannot enforce a global section ordering as the linker can only reorder sections within each output section (.text, .text.hot, .text.unlikely).
This patch promotes all functions with Propeller profiles (functions listed in the basic-block-sections profile) to .text.hot. The feature is hidden behind the flag `--bbsections-guided-section-prefix` which defaults to `true`.
The new implementation refactors the parsing of basic block sections profile into a new `BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader` analysis pass. This allows us to use the information earlier in `CodeGenPrepare` in order to set the functions text prefix. `BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader` will be used both by `BasicBlockSections` pass and `CodeGenPrepare`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122930
This is the first commit for the cmov-vs-branch optimization pass.
The goal is to develop a new profile-guided and target-independent cost/benefit analysis
for selecting conditional moves over branches when optimizing for performance.
Initially, this new pass is expected to be enabled only for instrumentation-based PGO.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-cmov-vs-branch-optimization/6040
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120230
This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CGA
aware) nature of the unwind tables.
Unlike the `CFIInstrInserer` pass, this one almost always emits only
`.cfi_remember_state`/`.cfi_restore_state`, which results in smaller
unwind tables and also transparently handles custom unwind info
extensions like CFA offset adjustement and save locations of SVE
registers.
This pass takes advantage of the constraints taht LLVM imposes on the
placement of save/restore points (cf. `ShrinkWrap.cpp`):
* there is a single basic block, containing the function prologue
* possibly multiple epilogue blocks, where each epilogue block is
complete and self-contained, i.e. CSR restore instructions (and the
corresponding CFI instructions are not split across two or more
blocks.
* prologue and epilogue blocks are outside of any loops
Thus, during execution, at the beginning and at the end of each basic
block the function can be in one of two states:
- "has a call frame", if the function has executed the prologue, or
has not executed any epilogue
- "does not have a call frame", if the function has not executed the
prologue, or has executed an epilogue
These properties can be computed for each basic block by a single RPO
traversal.
From the point of view of the unwind tables, the "has/does not have
call frame" state at beginning of each block is determined by the
state at the end of the previous block, in layout order.
Where these states differ, we insert compensating CFI instructions,
which come in two flavours:
- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the
initial one. This is done by a target specific hook and is
expected to be trivial to implement, for example it could be:
```
.cfi_def_cfa <sp>, 0
.cfi_same_value <rN>
.cfi_same_value <rN-1>
...
```
where `<rN>` are the callee-saved registers.
- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the one
created by the function prologue. These are the sequence:
```
.cfi_restore_state
.cfi_remember_state
```
In this case we also insert a `.cfi_remember_state` after the
last CFI instruction in the function prologue.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, danielkiss, chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114545
This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CFG
aware) nature of the unwind tables.
Unlike the `CFIInstrInserer` pass, this one almost always emits only
`.cfi_remember_state`/`.cfi_restore_state`, which results in smaller
unwind tables and also transparently handles custom unwind info
extensions like CFA offset adjustement and save locations of SVE
registers.
This pass takes advantage of the constraints that LLVM imposes on the
placement of save/restore points (cf. `ShrinkWrap.cpp`):
* there is a single basic block, containing the function prologue
* possibly multiple epilogue blocks, where each epilogue block is
complete and self-contained, i.e. CSR restore instructions (and the
corresponding CFI instructions are not split across two or more
blocks.
* prologue and epilogue blocks are outside of any loops
Thus, during execution, at the beginning and at the end of each basic
block the function can be in one of two states:
- "has a call frame", if the function has executed the prologue, or
has not executed any epilogue
- "does not have a call frame", if the function has not executed the
prologue, or has executed an epilogue
These properties can be computed for each basic block by a single RPO
traversal.
In order to accommodate backends which do not generate unwind info in
epilogues we compute an additional property "strong no call frame on
entry" which is set for the entry point of the function and for every
block reachable from the entry along a path that does not execute the
prologue. If this property holds, it takes precedence over the "has a
call frame" property.
From the point of view of the unwind tables, the "has/does not have
call frame" state at beginning of each block is determined by the
state at the end of the previous block, in layout order.
Where these states differ, we insert compensating CFI instructions,
which come in two flavours:
- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the
initial one. This is done by a target specific hook and is
expected to be trivial to implement, for example it could be:
```
.cfi_def_cfa <sp>, 0
.cfi_same_value <rN>
.cfi_same_value <rN-1>
...
```
where `<rN>` are the callee-saved registers.
- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the one
created by the function prologue. These are the sequence:
```
.cfi_restore_state
.cfi_remember_state
```
In this case we also insert a `.cfi_remember_state` after the
last CFI instruction in the function prologue.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, danielkiss, chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114545
Layering-wise, it seems RegisterBank stuff fits under CodeGen, like
other target abstraction.
In particular, TargetSubtargetInfo has a getRegBankInfo member, but
using that object requires making sure GlobalISel is linked, which is
not always the case (e.g. llvm-jitlink doesn't).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119053
The introduction and some examples are on this page:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/announcing-jmc-stepping-in-visual-studio/
The `/JMC` flag enables these instrumentations:
- Insert at the beginning of every function immediately after the prologue with
a call to `void __fastcall __CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode(unsigned char *JMC_flag)`.
The argument for `__CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode` is the address of a boolean
global variable (the global variable is initialized to 1) with the name
convention `__<hash>_<filename>`. All such global variables are placed in
the `.msvcjmc` section.
- The `<hash>` part of `__<hash>_<filename>` has a one-to-one mapping
with a directory path. MSVC uses some unknown hashing function. Here I
used DJB.
- Add a dummy/empty COMDAT function `__JustMyCode_Default`.
- Add `/alternatename:__CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode=__JustMyCode_Default` link
option via ".drectve" section. This is to prevent failure in
case `__CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode` is not provided during linking.
Implementation:
All the instrumentations are implemented in an IR codegen pass. The pass is placed immediately before CodeGenPrepare pass. This is to not interfere with mid-end optimizations and make the instrumentation target-independent (I'm still working on an ELF port in a separate patch).
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118428
The bulk of the implementation is common between 'release' mode (==AOT-ed
model) and 'development' mode (for training), the main difference is
that in development mode, we may also log features (for training logs),
inject scoring information (currently after the Virtual Register
Rewriter) and then produce the log file.
This patch also introduces the score injection pass, 'Register
Allocation Pass Scoring', which is trivially just logging the score in
development mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117147
This patch introduces the eviction analysis and the eviction advisor,
the default implementation, and the scaffolding for introducing the
other implementations of the advisor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115707
Reverts 02940d6d22. Fixes breakage in the modules build.
LLVM loops cannot represent irreducible structures in the CFG. This
change introduce the concept of cycles as a generalization of loops,
along with a CycleInfo analysis that discovers a nested
hierarchy of such cycles. This is based on Havlak (1997), Nesting of
Reducible and Irreducible Loops.
The cycle analysis is implemented as a generic template and then
instatiated for LLVM IR and Machine IR. The template relies on a new
GenericSSAContext template which must be specialized when used for
each IR.
This review is a restart of an older review request:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83094
Original implementation by Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>,
with recent refactoring by Sameer Sahasrabuddhe <sameer.sahasrabuddhe@amd.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112696
Add the calculation of a score, which will be used during ML training. The
score qualifies the quality of a regalloc policy, and is independent of
what we train (currently, just eviction), or the regalloc algo itself.
We can then use scores to guide training (which happens offline), by
formulating a reward based on score variation - the goal being lowering
scores (currently, that reward is percentage reduction relative to
Greedy's heuristic)
Currently, we compute the score by factoring different instruction
counts (loads, stores, etc) with the machine basic block frequency,
regardless of the instructions' provenance - i.e. they could be due to
the regalloc policy or be introduced previously. This is different from
RAGreedy::reportStats, which accummulates the effects of the allocator
alone. We explored this alternative but found (at least currently) that
the more naive alternative introduced here produces better policies. We
do intend to consolidate the two, however, as we are actively
investigating improvements to our reward function, and will likely want
to re-explore scoring just the effects of the allocator.
In either case, we want to decouple score calculation from allocation
algorighm, as we currently evaluate it after a few more passes after
allocation (also, because score calculation should be reusable
regardless of allocation algorithm).
We intentionally accummulate counts independently because it facilitates
per-block reporting, which we found useful for debugging - for instance,
we can easily report the counts indepdently, and then cross-reference
with perf counter measurements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115195
LLVM loops cannot represent irreducible structures in the CFG. This
change introduce the concept of cycles as a generalization of loops,
along with a CycleInfo analysis that discovers a nested
hierarchy of such cycles. This is based on Havlak (1997), Nesting of
Reducible and Irreducible Loops.
The cycle analysis is implemented as a generic template and then
instatiated for LLVM IR and Machine IR. The template relies on a new
GenericSSAContext template which must be specialized when used for
each IR.
This review is a restart of an older review request:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83094
Original implementation by Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>,
with recent refactoring by Sameer Sahasrabuddhe <sameer.sahasrabuddhe@amd.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112696
The Pre-RA VLIWMachineScheduler used by Hexagon is a relatively generic
implementation that would make sense to use on other VLIW targets.
This commit lifts those classes into their own header/source file with the
root VLIWMachineScheduler. I chose this path rather than adding the
strategy et al. into MachineScheduler to avoid bloating the file with other
implementations.
Target-specific behaviors have been captured and replicated through
function overloads.
- Added an overloadable DFAPacketizer creation member function. This is
mainly done for our downstream, which has the capability to override
the DFAPacketizer with custom implementations. This is an upstreamable
TODO on our end. Currently, it always returns the result of
TargetInstrInfo::CreateTargetScheduleState
- Added an extra helper which returns the number of instructions in the
current packet. This is used in our downstream, and may be useful
elsewhere.
- Placed the priority heuristic values into the ConvergingVLIWscheduler
class instead of defining them as local statics in the implementation
- Added a overridable helper in ConvergingVLIWScheduler so that targets
can create their own VLIWResourceModel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113150
This is a port of the feature that allows the StackProtector pass to omit
checking code for stack canary checks, and rely on SelectionDAG to do it at a
later stage. The reasoning behind this seems to be to prevent the IR checking
instructions from hindering tail-call optimizations during codegen.
Here we allow GlobalISel to also use that scheme. Doing so requires that we
do some analysis using some factored-out code to determine where to generate
code for the epilogs.
Not every case is handled in this patch since we don't have support for all
targets that exercise different stack protector schemes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98200
This patch implements Flow Sensitive Sample FDO (FSAFDO) profile
loader. We have two profile loaders for FS profile,
one before RegAlloc and one before BlockPlacement.
To enable it, when -fprofile-sample-use=<profile> is specified,
add "-enable-fs-discriminator=true \
-disable-ra-fsprofile-loader=false \
-disable-layout-fsprofile-loader=false"
to turn on the FS profile loaders.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107878
This new MIR pass removes redundant DBG_VALUEs.
After the register allocator is done, more precisely, after
the Virtual Register Rewriter, we end up having duplicated
DBG_VALUEs, since some virtual registers are being rewritten
into the same physical register as some of existing DBG_VALUEs.
Each DBG_VALUE should indicate (at least before the LiveDebugValues)
variables assignment, but it is being clobbered for function
parameters during the SelectionDAG since it generates new DBG_VALUEs
after COPY instructions, even though the parameter has no assignment.
For example, if we had a DBG_VALUE $regX as an entry debug value
representing the parameter, and a COPY and after the COPY,
DBG_VALUE $virt_reg, and after the virtregrewrite the $virt_reg gets
rewritten into $regX, we'd end up having redundant DBG_VALUE.
This breaks the definition of the DBG_VALUE since some analysis passes
might be built on top of that premise..., and this patch tries to fix
the MIR with the respect to that.
This first patch performs bacward scan, by trying to detect a sequence of
consecutive DBG_VALUEs, and to remove all DBG_VALUEs describing one
variable but the last one:
For example:
(1) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
(2) DBG_VALUE $esi, !"var2", ...
(3) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
...
in this case, we can remove (1).
By combining the forward scan that will be introduced in the next patch
(from this stack), by inspecting the statistics, the RemoveRedundantDebugValues
removes 15032 instructions by using gdb-7.11 as a testbed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105279
- Distinct metadata needs generating in the codegen to attach correct
AAInfo on the loads/stores after lowering, merging, and other relevant
transformations.
- This patch adds 'MachhineModuleSlotTracker' to help assign slot
numbers to these newly generated unnamed metadata nodes.
- To help 'MachhineModuleSlotTracker' track machine metadata, the
original 'SlotTracker' is rebased from 'AbstractSlotTrackerStorage',
which provides basic interfaces to create/retrive metadata slots. In
addition, once LLVM IR is processsed, additional hooks are also
introduced to help collect machine metadata and assign them slot
numbers.
- Finally, if there is any such machine metadata, 'MIRPrinter' outputs
an additional 'machineMetadataNodes' field containing all the
definition of those nodes.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103205
This patch implements first part of Flow Sensitive SampleFDO (FSAFDO).
It has the following changes:
(1) disable current discriminator encoding scheme,
(2) new hierarchical discriminator for FSAFDO.
For this patch, option "-enable-fs-discriminator=true" turns on the new
functionality. Option "-enable-fs-discriminator=false" (the default)
keeps the current SampleFDO behavior. When the fs-discriminator is
enabled, we insert a flag variable, namely, llvm_fs_discriminator, to
the object. This symbol will checked by create_llvm_prof tool, and used
to generate a profile with FS-AFDO discriminators enabled. If this
happens, for an extbinary format profile, create_llvm_prof tool
will add a flag to profile summary section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102246
We want it to be available in analyzes so that we could use the
CodeGen notion in middle-end passes (for example, to check if
a GC may free some particular pointer).
This is a preparatory patch that simply moves the files around.
Note: if this causes some build issues, this patch must just be reverted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100557
Reviewed By: reames
Serialize ScavengeFI from SIMachineFunctionInfo into yaml.
ScavengeFI is not used outside of the PrologEpilogInserter,
so this shouldn't change anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101367
This reverts the revert 02c5ba8679
Fix:
Pass was registered as DUMMY_FUNCTION_PASS causing the newpm-pass
functions to be doubly defined. Triggered in -DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULE=1
builds.
Original commit:
This patch implements expansion of llvm.vp.* intrinsics
(https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#vector-predication-intrinsics).
VP expansion is required for targets that do not implement VP code
generation. Since expansion is controllable with TTI, targets can switch
on the VP intrinsics they do support in their backend offering a smooth
transition strategy for VP code generation (VE, RISC-V V, ARM SVE,
AVX512, ..).
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78203
This patch implements expansion of llvm.vp.* intrinsics
(https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#vector-predication-intrinsics).
VP expansion is required for targets that do not implement VP code
generation. Since expansion is controllable with TTI, targets can switch
on the VP intrinsics they do support in their backend offering a smooth
transition strategy for VP code generation (VE, RISC-V V, ARM SVE,
AVX512, ..).
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78203
In the future Windows will enable Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET aka shadow stacks). To protect the path where the context is updated during exception handling, the binary is required to enumerate valid unwind entrypoints in a dedicated section which is validated when the context is being set during exception handling.
This change allows llvm to generate the section that contains the appropriate symbol references in the form expected by the msvc linker.
This feature is enabled through a new module flag, ehcontguard, which was modelled on the cfguard flag.
The change includes a test that when the module flag is enabled the section is correctly generated.
The set of exception continuation information includes returns from exceptional control flow (catchret in llvm).
In order to collect catchret we:
1) Includes an additional flag on machine basic blocks to indicate that the given block is the target of a catchret operation,
2) Introduces a new machine function pass to insert and collect symbols at the start of each block, and
3) Combines these targets with the other EHCont targets that were already being collected.
Change originally authored by Daniel Frampton <dframpto@microsoft.com>
For more details, see MSVC documentation for `/guard:ehcont`
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/guard-enable-eh-continuation-metadata
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94835
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics (i.e., LLVM
intrinsics operating on vector operands) with calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with calls to vector
libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are vectorized by the Loop- or
SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM intrinsics
already operating on vector operands, e.g., if such code was generated
by MLIR. For the replacement, information from the TargetLibraryInfo,
e.g., as specified via -vector-library is used.
This is a re-try of the original commit 2303e93e66 that was reverted
due to pass manager problems. Other minor changes have also been made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics
(i.e., LLVM intrinsics operating on vector operands) with
calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with
calls to vector libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are
vectorized by the Loop- or SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM
intrinsics already operating on vector operands, e.g., if
such code was generated by MLIR. For the replacement,
information from the TargetLibraryInfo, e.g., as specified
via -vector-library is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
This reverts commit 94427af60c (relands
4646de5d75 with fix).
Use "return std::move(AsmStreamer);" instead of "return AsmStreamer;" in
LVMTargetMachine::createMCStreamer. Unlike Clang, GCC seems having trouble
inserting a implicit lvalue->rvalue conversion.
Following up on D67687.
Please refer to the RFC here http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143309.html
`CodeGenPassBuilder` is the NPM counterpart of `TargetPassConfig` with below differences.
- Debugging features (MIR print/verify, disable pass, start/stop-before/after, etc.) living in `TargetPassConfig` are moved to use PassInstrument as much as possible. (Implementation also lives in `TargetPassConfig.cpp`)
- `TargetPassConfig` is a polymorphic base (virtual inheritance) to build the target-dependent pipeline whereas `CodeGenPassBuilder` is the CRTP base/helper to implement the target-dependent pipeline. The motivation is flexibility for targets to customize the pipeline, inlining opportunity, and fits the overall NPM value semantics design.
- `TargetPassConfig` is a legacy immutable pass to declare hooks for targets to customize some target-independent codegen layer behavior. This is partially ported to TargetMachine::options. The rest, such as `createMachineScheduler/createPostMachineScheduler`, are left out for now. They should be implemented in LLVMTargetMachine in the future.
Reviewed By: arsenm, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83608
Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91595
Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91595
Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91595
Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95195
ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrinsic is currently a codeGen level pass. The pass
is actually operating on IR level and does not use any code gen specific
passes. It is useful to move it into transforms directory so that it
can be more widely used as a mid-level transform as well (apart from
usage in codegen pipeline).
In particular, we have a usecase downstream where we would like to use
this pass in our mid-level pipeline which operates on IR level.
The next change will be to add support for new PM.
Reviewers: craig.topper, apilipenko, skatkov
Reviewed-By: skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92407
An indirect call site needs to be probed for its potential call targets. With CSSPGO a direct call also needs a probe so that a calling context can be represented by a stack of callsite probes. Unlike pseudo probes for basic blocks that are in form of standalone intrinsic call instructions, pseudo probes for callsites have to be attached to the call instruction, thus a separate instruction would not work.
One possible way of attaching a probe to a call instruction is to use a special metadata that carries information about the probe. The special metadata will have to make its way through the optimization pipeline down to object emission. This requires additional efforts to maintain the metadata in various places. Given that the `!dbg` metadata is a first-class metadata and has all essential support in place , leveraging the `!dbg` metadata as a channel to encode pseudo probe information is probably the easiest solution.
With the requirement of not inflating `!dbg` metadata that is allocated for almost every instruction, we found that the 32-bit DWARF discriminator field which mainly serves AutoFDO can be reused for pseudo probes. DWARF discriminators distinguish identical source locations between instructions and with pseudo probes such support is not required. In this change we are using the discriminator field to encode the ID and type of a callsite probe and the encoded value will be unpacked and consumed right before object emission. When a callsite is inlined, the callsite discriminator field will go with the inlined instructions. The `!dbg` metadata of an inlined instruction is in form of a scope stack. The top of the stack is the instruction's original `!dbg` metadata and the bottom of the stack is for the original callsite of the top-level inliner. Except for the top of the stack, all other elements of the stack actually refer to the nested inlined callsites whose discriminator field (which actually represents a calliste probe) can be used together to represent the inline context of an inlined PseudoProbeInst or CallInst.
To avoid collision with the baseline AutoFDO in various places that handles dwarf discriminators where a check against the `-pseudo-probe-for-profiling` switch is not available, a special encoding scheme is used to tell apart a pseudo probe discriminator from a regular discriminator. For the regular discriminator, if all lowest 3 bits are non-zero, it means the discriminator is basically empty and all higher 29 bits can be reversed for pseudo probe use.
Callsite pseudo probes are inserted in `SampleProfileProbePass` and a target-independent MIR pass `PseudoProbeInserter` is added to unpack the probe ID/type from `!dbg`.
Note that with this work the switch -debug-info-for-profiling will not work with -pseudo-probe-for-profiling anymore. They cannot be used at the same time.
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91756
No longer rely on an external tool to build the llvm component layout.
Instead, leverage the existing `add_llvm_componentlibrary` cmake function and
introduce `add_llvm_component_group` to accurately describe component behavior.
These function store extra properties in the created targets. These properties
are processed once all components are defined to resolve library dependencies
and produce the header expected by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90848
These logically belong together since it's a base commit plus
followup fixes to less common build configurations.
The patches are:
Revert "CfgInterface: rename interface() to getInterface()"
This reverts commit a74fc48158.
Revert "Wrap CfgTraitsFor in namespace llvm to please GCC 5"
This reverts commit f2a06875b6.
Revert "Try to make GCC5 happy about the CfgTraits thing"
This reverts commit 03a5f7ce12.
Revert "Introduce CfgTraits abstraction"
This reverts commit c0cdd22c72.
Rahman Lavaee