After much back and forth, I decided to deviate from ARM design and split LDR into 4 instructions (r + imm12, r + imm8, r + r << imm12, constantpool). The advantage of this is 1) it follows the latest ARM technical manual, and 2) makes it easier to reduce the width of the instruction later. The down side is this creates more inconsistency between the two sub-targets. We should split ARM LDR instruction in a similar fashion later. I've added a README entry for this.
llvm-svn: 74420
while experimenting. I'm reasonably sure this is correct, but please
tell me if these instructions have some strange property which makes this
change unsafe.
llvm-svn: 73746
When compiling in Thumb mode, only the low (R0-R7) registers are available
for most instructions. Breaking the low registers into a new register class
handles this. Uses of R12, SP, etc, are handled explicitly where needed
with copies inserted to move results into low registers where the rest of
the code generator can deal with them.
llvm-svn: 68545
1. Legalize now always promotes truncstore of i1 to i8.
2. Remove patterns and gunk related to truncstore i1 from targets.
3. Rename the StoreXAction stuff to TruncStoreAction in TLI.
4. Make the TLI TruncStoreAction table a 2d table to handle from/to conversions.
5. Mark a wide variety of invalid truncstores as such in various targets, e.g.
X86 currently doesn't support truncstore of any of its integer types.
6. Add legalize support for truncstores with invalid value input types.
7. Add a dag combine transform to turn store(truncate) into truncstore when
safe.
The later allows us to compile CodeGen/X86/storetrunc-fp.ll to:
_foo:
fldt 20(%esp)
fldt 4(%esp)
faddp %st(1)
movl 36(%esp), %eax
fstps (%eax)
ret
instead of:
_foo:
subl $4, %esp
fldt 24(%esp)
fldt 8(%esp)
faddp %st(1)
fstps (%esp)
movl 40(%esp), %eax
movss (%esp), %xmm0
movss %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $4, %esp
ret
llvm-svn: 46140
adjustment fields, and an optional flag. If there is a "dynamic_stackalloc" in
the code, make sure that it's bracketed by CALLSEQ_START and CALLSEQ_END. If
not, then there is the potential for the stack to be changed while the stack's
being used by another instruction (like a call).
This can only result in tears...
llvm-svn: 44037
InOperandList. This gives one piece of important information: # of results
produced by an instruction.
An example of the change:
def ADD32rr : I<0x01, MRMDestReg, (ops GR32:$dst, GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2),
"add{l} {$src2, $dst|$dst, $src2}",
[(set GR32:$dst, (add GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2))]>;
=>
def ADD32rr : I<0x01, MRMDestReg, (outs GR32:$dst), (ins GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2),
"add{l} {$src2, $dst|$dst, $src2}",
[(set GR32:$dst, (add GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2))]>;
llvm-svn: 40033
instruction flag, and use the flag along with a virtual member function
hook for targets to override if there are instructions that are only
trivially rematerializable with specific operands (i.e. constant pool
loads).
llvm-svn: 37728
with a general target hook to identify rematerializable instructions. Some
instructions are only rematerializable with specific operands, such as loads
from constant pools, while others are always rematerializable. This hook
allows both to be identified as being rematerializable with the same
mechanism.
llvm-svn: 37644
David Goodwin