Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amy Huang 7b1d793713 Reland "Change the X86 datalayout to add three address spaces
for 32 bit signed, 32 bit unsigned, and 64 bit pointers."
This reverts 57076d3199.

Original review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931.
Review for added fix at https://reviews.llvm.org/D66843.

llvm-svn: 371568
2019-09-10 23:15:38 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich 57076d3199 Revert "Change the X86 datalayout to add three address spaces for 32 bit signed,"
This reverts commit r370083 because it caused check-lld failures on
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.

llvm-svn: 370142
2019-08-28 01:08:54 +00:00
Amy Huang 1299945b81 Change the X86 datalayout to add three address spaces for 32 bit signed,
32 bit unsigned, and 64 bit pointers.

llvm-svn: 370083
2019-08-27 17:46:53 +00:00
Jon Chesterfield e0ca2ff070 [LLD] Mark a number of x86 only tests to require x86
Noticed while testing for an out of tree target. There are probably more tests that should be so marked.
I'm not sure who owns these tests so I've added a few names I recognise from the recent history.

With advice from probinson, ruiu, rafael and dramatically improved by davidb. Thank you all!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34685

llvm-svn: 308335
2017-07-18 18:40:50 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 89061b2224 IR: Replace the "Linker Options" module flag with "llvm.linker.options" named metadata.
The new metadata is easier to manipulate than module flags.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31349

llvm-svn: 305227
2017-06-12 20:10:48 +00:00
Bob Haarman 25c731874d COFF: add test for /INCLUDE directives specified in bitcode
Summary: MSVC allows linker options to be specified in source code. One of these is the /INCLUDE directive, which specifies that a symbol must be added to the symbol table, even if it otherwise wouldn't be. Existing tests cover the case where the linker is given an object file with an /INCLUDE directive, but we also need to cover the case where /INCLUDE is specified in a bitcode file (as would happen when using LTO). This new test covers that case.

Reviewers: pcc, ruiu

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29096

llvm-svn: 293107
2017-01-25 23:07:40 +00:00