Add PGO support at -O0 in the experimental new pass manager to sync the
behavior of the legacy pass manager.
Also change the test of gcc-flag-compatibility.c for more complete test:
(1) change the match string to "profc" and "profd" to ensure the
instrumentation is happening.
(2) add IR format proftext so that PGO use compilation is tested.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64029
llvm-svn: 367628
This contains the part of D62225 which fixes Profile/gcc-flag-compatibility.c
by adding the pass that allows default profile generation to work under the new
PM. It seems that ./default.profraw was not being generated with new PM enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63155
llvm-svn: 363278
Currently InstrProf lowering is not enabled for Clang PGO instrumentation in
the new pass manager. The following command
"-fprofile-instr-generate -fexperimental-new-pass-manager ..." is broken.
This CL enables InstrProf lowering pass for Clang PGO instrumentation in the
new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61138
llvm-svn: 359215
Summary:
I hadn't realized that instrumentation runs before inlining, so we can't
use the function as the comdat group. Doing so can create relocations
against discarded sections when references to discarded __profc_
variables are inlined into functions outside the function's comdat
group.
In the future, perhaps we should consider standardizing the comdat group
names that ELF and COFF use. It will save object file size, since
__profv_$sym won't appear in the symbol table again.
Reviewers: xur, vsk
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58737
llvm-svn: 355044
Summary:
The MS C++ ABI has no constructor variants, but it has destructor
variants, so we should move the deleting destructor variant check
outside the check for "does the ABI have constructor variants".
Fixes PR37561, so basic code coverage works on Windows with C++.
Reviewers: vsk
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58691
llvm-svn: 354924
Lifting from Bob Wilson's notes: The hash value that we compute and
store in PGO profile data to detect out-of-date profiles does not
include enough information. This means that many significant changes to
the source will not cause compiler warnings about the profile being out
of date, and worse, we may continue to use the outdated profile data to
make bad optimization decisions. There is some tension here because
some source changes won't affect PGO and we don't want to invalidate the
profile unnecessarily.
This patch adds a new hashing scheme which is more sensitive to loop
nesting, conditions, and out-of-order control flow. Here are examples
which show snippets which get the same hash under the current scheme,
and different hashes under the new scheme:
Loop Nesting Example
--------------------
// Snippet 1
while (foo()) {
while (bar()) {}
}
// Snippet 2
while (foo()) {}
while (bar()) {}
Condition Example
-----------------
// Snippet 1
if (foo())
bar();
baz();
// Snippet 2
if (foo())
bar();
else
baz();
Out-of-order Control Flow Example
---------------------------------
// Snippet 1
while (foo()) {
if (bar()) {}
baz();
}
// Snippet 2
while (foo()) {
if (bar())
continue;
baz();
}
In each of these cases, it's useful to differentiate between the
snippets because swapping their profiles gives bad optimization hints.
The new hashing scheme considers some logical operators in an effort to
detect more changes in conditions. This isn't a perfect scheme. E.g, it
does not produce the same hash for these equivalent snippets:
// Snippet 1
bool c = !a || b;
if (d && e) {}
// Snippet 2
bool f = d && e;
bool c = !a || b;
if (f) {}
This would require an expensive data flow analysis. Short of that, the
new hashing scheme looks reasonably complete, based on a scan over the
statements we place counters on.
Profiles which use the old version of the PGO hash remain valid and can
be used without issue (there are tests in tree which check this).
rdar://17068282
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39446
llvm-svn: 318229
The root cause of the issues reported in D32406 and D34680 is that clang
instruments functions without bodies. Make it stop doing that, and also
teach it how to use old (incorrectly generated) profiles without
crashing.
llvm-svn: 306883
Clang warns that a profile is out-of-date if it can't find a profile
record for any function in a TU. This warning became noisy after llvm
started allowing dead-stripping of instrumented functions.
To fix this, this patch changes the existing profile out-of-date warning
(-Wprofile-instr-out-of-date) so that it only complains about mismatched
data. Further, it introduces a new, off-by-default warning about missing
function data (-Wprofile-instr-missing).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28867
llvm-svn: 301570
2nd attempt: the first was in r296231, but it had a use after lifetime
bug.
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into llvm
select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile counter
increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment of the counter
for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from the 'else branch'
(this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is selected
twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do the
proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296245
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into
llvm select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile
counter increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment
of the counter for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from
the 'else branch' (this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is
selected twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do
the proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296231
Fix the fact that we don't assign profile counters to constructors in
classes with virtual bases, or constructors with variadic parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30131
llvm-svn: 296062
The cxx-structors.cpp test checks that some instrumentation doesn't
appear, but it should be more explicit about which instrumentation it
actually expects to appear.
llvm-svn: 295532
The frontend can't see "__profn" profile name variables after IRGen
because llvm throws these away now. Tighten up some test cases which
checked for the non-existence of those variables.
llvm-svn: 295528
This is a re-try of r295085: fix up some test cases that assume that
profile name variables are preserved by the instrprof pass.
This catches one additional case in test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c.
llvm-svn: 295101
Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
Value profiling should not profile constants and/or constant
expressions when they appear as callees in call instructions.
Constant expressions form when a direct callee has bitcasts or
inttoptr(ptrtint (callee)) nests surrounding it. Value profiling
should avoid instrumenting such cases. Mostly NFC.
llvm-svn: 265037
For terminator instructions, the value profiling instrumentation
happens in a basic block other than where the value site resides.
This CR moves the instrumentation point prior to the value site.
Mostly NFC.
llvm-svn: 264783
This patch changes cc1 option for PGO profile use from
-fprofile-instr-use=<path> to -fprofile-instrument-use-path=<path>.
-fprofile-instr-use=<path> is now a driver only option.
In addition to decouple the cc1 option from the driver level option, this patch
also enables IR level profile use. cc1 option handling now reads the profile
header and sets CodeGenOpt ProfileUse (valid values are {None, Clang, LLVM}
-- this is a common enum for -fprofile-instrument={}, for the profile
instrumentation), and invoke the pipeline to enable the respective PGO use pass.
Reviewers: silvas, davidxl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17737
llvm-svn: 262515
This patch changes cc1 option -fprofile-instr-generate to an enum option
-fprofile-instrument={clang|none}. It also changes cc1 options
-fprofile-instr-generate= to -fprofile-instrument-path=.
The driver level option -fprofile-instr-generate and -fprofile-instr-generate=
remain intact. This change will pave the way to integrate new PGO
instrumentation in IR level.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16730
llvm-svn: 259811
1. Make test case more focused and robust by focusing on what to be tested (linkage, icall) -- make it easier to validate
2. Testing linkages of data and counter variables instead of names. Counters and data are more relavant to be tested.
llvm-svn: 259067
Rong Xu