We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
Two new matchers for `CXXNewExpr` are added which may be useful e.g. in
`clang-tidy` checkers. One of them is `isArray` which matches `new[]` but not
plain `new`. The other one, `hasArraySize` matches `new[]` for a given size.
llvm-svn: 318909
Summary:
Allow the `isDefinition()` matcher to apply to `ObjCMethodDecl` nodes, in
addition to those it already supports. For whatever reason, `ObjCMethodDecl`
does not inherit from `FunctionDecl` and so this is specialization is necessary.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, malcolm.parsons, alexshap
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39948
llvm-svn: 318152
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
HasDeclarationMatcher did not handle DeducedType, it always returned false for deduced types.
So with code like this:
struct X{};
auto x = X{};
This did no longer match:
varDecl(hasType(recordDecl(hasName("X"))))
Because HasDeclarationMatcher didn't resolve the DeducedType of x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36308
llvm-svn: 310095
Originally, we weren't able to match on Type nodes themselves (only QualType),
so the hasDeclaration matcher was initially written to give what we thought are
reasonable results for QualType matches.
When we chagned the matchers to allow matching on Type nodes, it turned out
that the hasDeclaration matcher was by chance written templated enough to now
allow hasDeclaration to also match on (some) Type nodes.
This patch change the hasDeclaration matcher to:
a) work the same on Type and QualType nodes,
b) be completely explicit about what nodes we can match instead of just allowing
anything with a getDecl() to match,
c) explicitly control desugaring only one level in very specific instances.
d) adds hasSpecializedTemplate and tagType matchers to allow migrating
existing use cases that now need more explicit matchers
Note: This patch breaks clang-tools-extra. The corresponding patch there
is approved and will land in a subsequent patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27104
llvm-svn: 309809
documentation.
Trying to match integerLiteral(-1) will silently fail, because an numeric
literal is always positive.
- Update the documentation to explain how to match negative numeric
literals.
- Add a unit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35196
llvm-svn: 307663
r305022 assumed that floatLiteral(equals(1.2)) would also match 1.2f and
1.2l, but apparently that is not the case. Until it is clear how to
match, temporary disable the test to fix CI.
llvm-svn: 305025
Summary:
This allows the clang-query tool to use matchers like
"integerLiteral(equals(32))". For this to work, an overloaded function
is added for each possible parameter type.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33094
llvm-svn: 305022
Summary:
Needed to support something like "floatLiteral(equals(1.0))". The
parser for floating point numbers is kept simple, so instead of ".1" you
have to use "0.1".
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33135
llvm-svn: 305021
Summary:
Recognize boolean literals for future extensions ("equals(true)").
Note that a specific VariantValue constructor is added to resolve
ambiguity (like "Value = 5") between unsigned and bool.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33093
llvm-svn: 305020
Summary:
This adds a new ASTMatcher for CXXStdInitializerListExprs that matches C++ initializer list expressions.
The primary motivation is to use it to fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]] (review here [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767 | D32767 ]]).
Reviewers: alexfh, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32810
llvm-svn: 302287
ODR use. These traits don't have a definition as they're intended to be
used strictly at compile time. Change the tests to use static_assert to
move the entire thing into compile-time.
llvm-svn: 291036
to make reference to template parameters. This is only a partial
implementation; we retain the restriction that the argument must not be
type-dependent, since it's unclear how that would work given the existence of
other language rules requiring an exact type match in this context, even for
type-dependent cases (a question has been raised on the core reflector).
llvm-svn: 290647
Summary:
I needed to know whether a FieldDecl had an in-class
initializer for D26453. I used a narrowing matcher there, but a
traversal matcher might be generally useful.
Reviewers: sbenza, bkramer, klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28034
llvm-svn: 290492
The unit tests in this patch demonstrate the need to traverse template
parameter lists of DeclaratorDecls (e.g. VarDecls, CXXMethodDecls) and
TagDecls (e.g. EnumDecls, RecordDecls).
Fixes PR29042.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24268
Patch from Lukasz
Łukasz Anforowicz <lukasza@chromium.org>!
llvm-svn: 281345
It was failing because it had an explicit check for whether we're on
Windows.
There are a few other similar explicit checks in this file which I
didn't remove because they serve as reasonable documentation that the
test doesn't work with a Windows triple.
llvm-svn: 274269
Summary:
This test was stat()'ing large swaths of /usr/lib hundreds of times, as
every invocation of matchesConditionally*() created a new Linux
toolchain.
In addition to being slow, perf indicated this was causing substantial
contention in the kernel.
Something is...interesting in the kernel, as without this patch I
sometimes see ~11m spent in the kernel, and sometimes ~5m. This
corresponds to bimodal ninja check-clang times of ~30s and ~20s.
It's not clear to me exactly what causes the bimodality. In any case,
this change makes this test run in 2.5s, down from 17s, and it seems to
cause us to get the 20s ninja check-clang time unconditionally.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21810
llvm-svn: 274257
Julie Hockett