- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
OperationHandle mostly existed to mirror the behavior of ValueHandle.
This has become unnecessary and can be retired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78692
Libraries declared as target_link_libraries() do not also need
to be declared as dependencies using add_dependencies().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78320
Summary:
This is much cleaner, and fits the same structure as many other tablegen backends. This was not done originally as the CRTP in the pass classes made it overly verbose/complex.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77367
This revision removes all of the CRTP from the pass hierarchy in preparation for using the tablegen backend instead. This creates a much cleaner interface in the C++ code, and naturally fits with the rest of the infrastructure. A new utility class, PassWrapper, is added to replicate the existing behavior for passes not suitable for using the tablegen backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77350
ModulePass doesn't provide any special utilities and thus doesn't give enough benefit to warrant a special pass class. This revision replaces all usages with the more general OperationPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77339
This revision adds support for generating utilities for passes such as options/statistics/etc. that can be inferred from the tablegen definition. This removes additional boilerplate from the pass, and also makes it easier to remove the reliance on the pass registry to provide certain things(e.g. the pass argument).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76659
This removes the need to statically register conversion passes, and also puts all of the conversions within one centralized file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76658
The Vector Dialect [document](https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/Vector/) discusses the vector abstractions that MLIR supports and the various tradeoffs involved.
One of the layer that is missing in OSS atm is the Hardware Vector Ops (HWV) level.
This revision proposes an AVX512-specific to add a new Dialect/Targets/AVX512 Dialect that would directly target AVX512-specific intrinsics.
Atm, we rely too much on LLVM’s peephole optimizer to do a good job from small insertelement/extractelement/shufflevector. In the future, when possible, generic abstractions such as VP intrinsics should be preferred.
The revision will allow trading off HW-specific vs generic abstractions in MLIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75987
Stephen Neuendorffer