This is a bit more involved than I anticipated, so here's a breakdown
of the changes:
1. Call ActOnFinishFunctionBody _after_ we parsed =default and
=delete specifiers. Saying that we finished the body before parsing
=default is just wrong. Changing this allows us to use isDefaulted
and isDeleted on a decl in ActOnFinishFunctionBody.
2. Check for -Wmissing-prototypes after we parsed the function body.
3. Disable -Wmissing-prototypes when the Decl isDeleted.
llvm-svn: 232040
Sema overrides ASTContext's policy on the first emitted diagnostic
(doesn't matter if it's ignored or not). This means changing the order
of diagnostic emission in Sema suddenly changes the text of diagnostic
emitted from the parser.
In the test case -Wmissing-prototypes (ignored) was the culprit, use
'int main' to suppress that warning so we see when this regresses.
Also move it into Sema/ as it's not testing any C++.
llvm-svn: 232039
Using declarations which are aliases to struct types have their name
used as the struct type's name for linkage purposes. Otherwise, make
sure to give an anonymous struct defined inside a using declaration a
mangling number to disambiguate it from other anonymous structs in the
same context.
This fixes PR22809.
llvm-svn: 231909
ParseCompoundStatement() currently never returns StmtError, but if it did,
Sema would keep the __finally scope on its stack indefinitely. Explicitly
add an error callback that clears it.
llvm-svn: 231625
Since continue, break, return are much more common than __finally, this tries
to keep the work for continue, break, return O(1). Sema keeps a stack of active
__finally scopes (to do this, ActOnSEHFinally() is split into
ActOnStartSEHFinally() and ActOnFinishSEHFinally()), and the various jump
statements then check if the current __finally scope (if present) is deeper
than then destination scope of the jump.
The same warning for goto statements is still missing.
This is the moral equivalent of MSVC's C4532.
llvm-svn: 231623
the presence of an abstract declarator with a ptr-operator as proof that a
construct cannot parse as an expression to improve diagnostics along error
recovery paths.
llvm-svn: 230261
ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix() for '->' (or '.') postfixes first calls
ActOnStartCXXMemberReference() to inform sema that a member reference is about
to start, and that function lets the parser know if sema thinks that the
base expression's type could allow a pseudo destructor from a semantic point of
view (for example, if the the base expression has a dependent type).
ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix() then calls ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() and
passes MayBePseudoDestructor on to that function, expecting the function to
set it to false if a pseudo destructor is impossible from a syntactic point of
view (due to a lack of '~' sigil). However, ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier()
had early-outs for ::new and __super, so MayBePseudoDestructor stayed true,
so we tried to parse a pseudo dtor, and then became confused since we couldn't
find a '~'. Move the snippet in ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() that sets
MayBePseudoDestructor to false above the early exits.
Parts of this found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 229449
In the case that we diagnosed an invalid attribute due to missing or present
arguments, we would return false, indicating to the caller that the parsing
failed. However, we would have added the attribute in ParseAttributeArgsCommon
(which may have been called indirectly through ParseGNUAttributeArgs).
Returning true in this case ensures that a second copy of the attribute is not
added.
I haven't added a test case for this as the existing test will cover this with
the next commit which diagnoses a C++14 attribute applied in C++11 mode. Rather
than duplicating the existing test case, allow the tree to remain without a test
between this and the next change. We would see double warnings in the
[[deprecated()]] applied to a declaration in C++11 mode, which will cause an
error in the cxx0x-attributes test.
llvm-svn: 229446
The first part of that line doesn't parse correctly and ParseClassSpecifier() for
some reason skips to tok::comma to recover, and then
ParseDeclarationSpecifiers() sees the next struct and calls
ParseClassSpecifier() again with the same DeclSpec object.
However, the first call already called ActOnCXXGlobalScopeSpecifier() on the
DeclSpec's CXXScopeSpec, and sema gets confused when this gets called again.
As a fix, let ParseClassSpecifier() (and ParseEnumSpecifier()) call
ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpec() with a temporary CXXScopeSpec object, and only
copy it into the DeclSpec if things work out. (This is also how all the other
functions that set the DeclSpec's TypeSpecScope set it.)
Found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 229288
(or of a lambda init-capture, which is sort-of such a variable). The semantics
of such constructs will change when we implement N3922, so we intend to warn on
this in Clang 3.6 then change the semantics in Clang 3.7.
llvm-svn: 228792
This used to crash, complaining "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist":
struct A { } b = b.~A::A <int>;
The only other caller of ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() that passes in a
non-empty ObjectType clears the ObjectType of the scope specifier comes back
non-empty (see the tok::period case in Parser::ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix()),
so do that here too.
Found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 227781
Even with r227555, this still crashed:
struct S {
int A;
~A::A() {}
};
That's because ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier()'s call to
ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier() doesn't mark the scope spec as invalid if sema
thought it's a good idea to fixit-correct "::" to ":". For the diagnostic
improvement done in r217302, we never want :: to be interpreted as :, so fix
this by setting ColonSacred to false temporarily.
Found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 227581
The lowering looks a lot like normal EH lowering, with the exception
that the exceptions are caught by executing filter expression code
instead of matching typeinfo globals. The filter expressions are
outlined into functions which are used in landingpad clauses where
typeinfo would normally go.
Major aspects that still need work:
- Non-call exceptions in __try bodies won't work yet. The plan is to
outline the __try block in the frontend to keep things simple.
- Filter expressions cannot use local variables until capturing is
implemented.
- __finally blocks will not run after exceptions. Fixing this requires
work in the LLVM SEH preparation pass.
The IR lowering looks like this:
// C code:
bool safe_div(int n, int d, int *r) {
__try {
*r = normal_div(n, d);
} __except(_exception_code() == EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
; LLVM IR:
define i32 @filter(i8* %e, i8* %fp) {
%ehptrs = bitcast i8* %e to i32**
%ehrec = load i32** %ehptrs
%code = load i32* %ehrec
%matches = icmp eq i32 %code, i32 u0xC0000094
%matches.i32 = zext i1 %matches to i32
ret i32 %matches.i32
}
define i1 zeroext @safe_div(i32 %n, i32 %d, i32* %r) {
%rr = invoke i32 @normal_div(i32 %n, i32 %d)
to label %normal unwind to label %lpad
normal:
store i32 %rr, i32* %r
ret i1 1
lpad:
%ehvals = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__C_specific_handler
catch i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*)
%ehptr = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 0
%sel = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 1
%filter_sel = call i32 @llvm.eh.seh.typeid.for(i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*))
%matches = icmp eq i32 %sel, %filter_sel
br i1 %matches, label %eh.except, label %eh.resume
eh.except:
ret i1 false
eh.resume:
resume
}
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5607
llvm-svn: 226760
The improved completion in call context now works with:
- Functions.
- Member functions.
- Constructors.
- New expressions.
- Function call expressions.
- Template variants of the previous.
There are still rough edges to be fixed:
- Provide support for optional parameters. (fix known)
- Provide support for member initializers. (fix known)
- Provide support for variadic template functions. (fix unknown)
- Others?
llvm-svn: 226670
Summary:
This patch add a new option to dis-allow all inline asm.
Any GCC style inline asm will be reported as an error.
Reviewers: rnk, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk, echristo
Subscribers: bob.wilson, rnk, echristo, rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6870
llvm-svn: 226340
ambiguity but wasn't.
In the new test case, "click" wasn't being corrected properly because
Sema::ClassifyName would call CorrectTypo for "click" then later
Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup would call CorrectTypoDelayed for the same use
of "click" (the former by the parser needing to determine what the
identifier is so it knows how to parse the statement, i.e. is it the
beginning of a declaration or an expression). CorrectTypo would record
that typo correction for "click" failed and CorrectTypoDelayed would see
that and not even try to correct the typo, even though in this case
CorrectTypo failed due to an ambiguity (both "Click" and "clock" having
an edit distance of one from "click") that could be resolved with more
information. The fix is two-fold:
1) Have CorrectTypo not record failed corrections if the reason for
the failure was two or more corrections with the same edit
distance, and
2) Make the CorrectionCandidateCallback used by
Parser::ParseCastExpression reject FunctionDecl candidates when the
next token after the identifier is a ".", "=", or "->" since
functions cannot be assigned to and do not have members that can be
referenced.
The reason for two correction spots is that from r222549 until r224375
landed, the first correction attempt would fail completely but the
second would suggest "clock" while having the note point to the
declaration of "Click".
llvm-svn: 226334
There was already an explicit check for that for the first decl. Move that
to a different place so that it's called for the following decls too. Also
don't randomly set the BitfieldSize ExprResult to true (this sets a pointer to
true internally).
Found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 226306
Sorry for the noise, I managed to miss a bunch of recent regressions of
include orderings here. This should actually sort all the includes for
Clang. Again, no functionality changed, this is just a mechanical
cleanup that I try to run periodically to keep the #include lines as
regular as possible across the project.
llvm-svn: 225979
The EOF token injection technique is preferable to using
isBeforeInTranslationUnit to determine whether or not additional cleanup
is needed. I don't have an example off-hand that requires it but it is
nicer nonetheless.
llvm-svn: 225776
Mark the end of the method body with an EOF token, collect it once we
expect to be done with method body parsing. No functionality change
intended.
llvm-svn: 225765
Similar to r225619, use a special EOF token to mark the end of the
exception specification instead of cxx_exceptspec_end. Use the current
scope as the marker.
llvm-svn: 225622
I added setEofData/getEofData to solve this sort of problem back in
r224505. Use the Param's decl to tell us if this is *our* EOF token.
llvm-svn: 225619
Benjamin Kramer