In particular, remove the OpaqueExpr transformation from r225389 and
move the correction of the conditional from CheckConditionalOperands to
ActOnConditionalOp before the OpaqueExpr is created. This fixes the
typo correction behavior in C code that uses the GNU extension for a
binary ?: (without an expression between the "?" and the ":").
llvm-svn: 227220
The lowering looks a lot like normal EH lowering, with the exception
that the exceptions are caught by executing filter expression code
instead of matching typeinfo globals. The filter expressions are
outlined into functions which are used in landingpad clauses where
typeinfo would normally go.
Major aspects that still need work:
- Non-call exceptions in __try bodies won't work yet. The plan is to
outline the __try block in the frontend to keep things simple.
- Filter expressions cannot use local variables until capturing is
implemented.
- __finally blocks will not run after exceptions. Fixing this requires
work in the LLVM SEH preparation pass.
The IR lowering looks like this:
// C code:
bool safe_div(int n, int d, int *r) {
__try {
*r = normal_div(n, d);
} __except(_exception_code() == EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
; LLVM IR:
define i32 @filter(i8* %e, i8* %fp) {
%ehptrs = bitcast i8* %e to i32**
%ehrec = load i32** %ehptrs
%code = load i32* %ehrec
%matches = icmp eq i32 %code, i32 u0xC0000094
%matches.i32 = zext i1 %matches to i32
ret i32 %matches.i32
}
define i1 zeroext @safe_div(i32 %n, i32 %d, i32* %r) {
%rr = invoke i32 @normal_div(i32 %n, i32 %d)
to label %normal unwind to label %lpad
normal:
store i32 %rr, i32* %r
ret i1 1
lpad:
%ehvals = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__C_specific_handler
catch i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*)
%ehptr = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 0
%sel = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 1
%filter_sel = call i32 @llvm.eh.seh.typeid.for(i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*))
%matches = icmp eq i32 %sel, %filter_sel
br i1 %matches, label %eh.except, label %eh.resume
eh.except:
ret i1 false
eh.resume:
resume
}
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5607
llvm-svn: 226760
We didn't consider any alignment attributes on an EnumDecl when
calculating alignment.
While we are here, ignore alignment specifications on typedef types if
one is used as the underlying type. Otherwise, weird things happen:
enum Y : int;
Y y;
typedef int __attribute__((aligned(64))) u;
enum Y : u {};
What is the alignment of 'Y'? It would be more consistent with the
overall design of enums with fixed underlying types to consider the
underlying type's UnqualifiedDesugaredType.
This fixes PR22279.
llvm-svn: 226653
Things that are OK:
extern int var1 __attribute((alias("v1")));
static int var2 __attribute((alias("v2")));
Things that are not OK:
int var3 __attribute((alias("v3")));
extern int var4 __attribute((alias("v4"))) = 4;
We choose to accpet:
struct S { static int var5 __attribute((alias("v5"))); };
This code causes assertion failues in GCC 4.8 and ICC 13.0.1, we have
no reason to reject it.
This partially fixes PR22217.
llvm-svn: 226436
We would check the type information from the declaration found by lookup
but we would neglect checking compatibility with the most recent
declaration. This would make it possible for us to not correctly
diagnose inconsistencies with declarations which were made in a
different scope.
llvm-svn: 225934
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
This is a different approach to r225780.
llvm-svn: 225875
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
llvm-svn: 225780
Clang would treat the digits in an "11m" input constraint separately as
if it was handling constraint 1 twice instead of constraint 11.
llvm-svn: 225606
Input constraints like "0" and "[foo]" should be treated the same when
it comes to their corresponding output constraint.
This fixes PR21850.
llvm-svn: 225605
transform.
Also diagnose typos in the initializer of an invalid C++ declaration.
Both issues were hit using the same line of test code, depending on
whether the code was treated as C or C++.
Fixes PR22092.
llvm-svn: 225389
Add additional constraint checking for target specific behaviour for inline
assembly constraints. We would previously silently let all arguments through
for these constraints. In cases where the constraints were violated, we could
end up failing to select instructions and triggering assertions or worse,
silently ignoring instructions.
llvm-svn: 225244
Many places in Sema cannot handle isNull() types. This is fine, because in
most places the type building code recovers by falling back to IntTy. In
GetFullTypeForDeclarator(), this is done at the end of the getNumTypeObjects()
loop body. This function calls BuildQualifiedType() before this fallback is
done though, so it explicitly needs to check for isNull() types.
llvm-svn: 225124
The lit.cfg files only add .cpp to suffixes, so these tests used to never run,
oops. (Also tweak to of these tests in minor ways to make the actually pass.)
llvm-svn: 224718
The extension has the following syntax:
__builtin_call_with_static_chain(Call, Chain)
where Call must be a function call expression and Chain must be of pointer type
This extension performs a function call Call with a static chain pointer
Chain passed to the callee in a designated register. This is useful for
calling foreign language functions whose ABI uses static chain pointers
(e.g. to implement closures).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6332
llvm-svn: 224167
#undef a keyword is generally harmless but used often in configuration scripts.
Also added tests that I forgot to include to commit in r223114.
llvm-svn: 224100
Summary:
This change implements warnings if macro name is identical to a keyword or
reserved identifier. The warnings are different depending on the "danger"
of the operation. Defining macro that replaces a keyword is on by default.
Other cases produce warning that is off by default but can be turned on
using option -Wreserved-id-macro.
This change fixes PR11488.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: rnk, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6194
llvm-svn: 223114
This attribute serves as a hint to improve warnings about the ranges of
enumerators used as flag types. It currently has no working C++ implementation
due to different semantics for enums in C++. For more explanation, see the docs
and testcases.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 222906
nonnull attribute when comparison is always true/false.
Original patch by Steven Wu. I have added extra code to prevent issuing of
warning when the nonnull parameter is modified prior to the comparison.
This addition prevents false positives in the most obvious cases.
There may still be false positive warnings in some cases (as one of my tests
indicates), but benefit far outweighs such cases. rdar://18712242
llvm-svn: 222264
Now we don't warn on this code:
void __stdcall f(void);
void __stdcall f();
My previous commit regressed this functionality because I didn't update
the relevant test case which used a definition.
llvm-svn: 221188
We already have a warning on the call sites of code like this:
void f() { }
void g() { f(1, 2, 3); }
t.c:2:21: warning: too many arguments in call to 'f'
We can limit ourselves to diagnosing unprototyped forward declarations
of f to cut down on noise.
llvm-svn: 221184
parameters with nonnull attribute when comparison is always
true/false. Patch causes false positive when parameter is
modified in the function.
llvm-svn: 221163
It turns out that MinGW never dllimports of exports inline functions.
This means that code compiled with Clang would fail to link with
MinGW-compiled libraries since we might try to import functions that
are not imported.
To fix this, make Clang never dllimport inline functions when targeting
MinGW.
llvm-svn: 221154
Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
llvm-svn: 220573
nonnull attribute when comparison is always
true/false. Patch by Steven Wu with few fixes and minor
refactoring and adding tests by me. rdar://18712242
llvm-svn: 220496
This is long-since overdue, and matches GCC 5.0. This should also be
backwards-compatible, because we already supported all of C11 as an extension
in C99 mode.
llvm-svn: 220244
When performing a type deduction from the return type, the FunctionDecl may be
attributed with a calling convention. In such a case, the retrieved type
location may be an AttributedTypeLoc. Performing a castAs<FunctionProtoTypeLoc>
on such a type loc would result in an assertion as they are not derived types.
Ensure that we correctly handle the attributed type location by looking through
it to the modified type loc.
Fixes an assertion triggered in C++14 mode.
llvm-svn: 219851
Summary: This fixes PR21155.
Test Plan: The patch includes a test.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5619
llvm-svn: 219322
Clang won't emit any prologues for such functions, so it would assert trying to
codegen the parameter references.
This patch makes Clang check the extended asm inputs and outputs for
references to function parameters.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5640
llvm-svn: 219272
Windows TLS relies on indexing through a tls_index in order to get at
the DLL's thread local variables. However, this index is not exported
along with the variable: it is assumed that all accesses to thread local
variables are inside the same module which created the variable in the
first place.
While there are several implementation techniques we could adopt to fix
this (notably, the Itanium ABI gets this for free), it is not worth the
heroics.
Instead, let's just ban this combination. We could revisit this in the
future if we need to.
This fixes PR21111.
llvm-svn: 219049
This test includes stdint.h, which might include system headers (and that might
not work, depending on the system configuration). Attempting to fix
llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast.
llvm-svn: 218959
Adds a Clang-specific implementation of C11's stdatomic.h header. On systems,
such as FreeBSD, where a stdatomic.h header is already provided, we defer to
that header instead (using our __has_include_next technology). Otherwise, we
provide an implementation in terms of our __c11_atomic_* intrinsics (that were
created for this purpose).
C11 7.1.4p1 requires function declarations for atomic_thread_fence,
atomic_signal_fence, atomic_flag_test_and_set,
atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit, and atomic_flag_clear, and requires that
they have external linkage. Accordingly, we provide these declarations, but if
a user elides the shadowing macros and uses them, then they must have a libc
(or similar) that actually provides definitions.
atomic_flag is implemented using _Bool as the underlying type. This is
consistent with the implementation provided by FreeBSD and also GCC 4.9 (at
least when __GCC_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL == 1).
Patch by Richard Smith (rebased and slightly edited by me -- Richard said I
should drive at this point).
llvm-svn: 218957
This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requested
support in Clang. It specifies an alignment assumption on the values to which a
pointer points, and is used by numerical libraries to encourage efficient
generation of vector code.
Of course, we already have an aligned attribute that can specify enhanced
alignment for a type, so why is this additional attribute important? The
problem is that if you want to specify that an input array of T is, say,
64-byte aligned, you could try this:
typedef double aligned_double attribute((aligned(64)));
void foo(aligned_double *P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // What alignment did those doubles have again?
}
the access here to P[1] causes problems. P was specified as a pointer to type
aligned_double, and any object of type aligned_double must be 64-byte aligned.
But if P[0] is 64-byte aligned, then P[1] cannot be, and this access causes
undefined behavior. Getting round this problem requires a lot of awkward
casting and hand-unrolling of loops, all of which is bad.
With the align_value attribute, we can accomplish what we'd like in a well
defined way:
typedef double *aligned_double_ptr attribute((align_value(64)));
void foo(aligned_double_ptr P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // This is fine too.
}
This attribute does not create a new type (and so it not part of the type
system), and so will only "propagate" through templates, auto, etc. by
optimizer deduction after inlining. This seems consistent with Intel's
implementation (thanks to Alexey for confirming the various Intel-compiler
behaviors).
As a final note, I would have chosen to call this aligned_value, not
align_value, for better naming consistency with the aligned attribute, but I
think it would be more useful to users to adopt Intel's name.
llvm-svn: 218910
Prior to GCC 4.4, __sync_fetch_and_nand was implemented as:
{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~tmp & value; return tmp; }
but this was changed in GCC 4.4 to be:
{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~(tmp & value); return tmp; }
in response to this change, support for sync_fetch_and_nand (and
sync_nand_and_fetch) was removed in r99522 in order to avoid miscompiling code
depending on the old semantics. However, at this point:
1. Many years have passed, and the amount of code relying on the old
semantics is likely smaller.
2. Through the work of many contributors, all LLVM backends have been updated
such that "atomicrmw nand" provides the newer GCC 4.4+ semantics (this process
was complete July of 2014 (added to the release notes in r212635).
3. The lack of this intrinsic is now a needless impediment to porting codes
from GCC to Clang (I've now seen several examples of this).
It is true, however, that we still set GNUC_MINOR to 2 (corresponding to GCC
4.2). To compensate for this, and to address the original concern regarding
code relying on the old semantics, I've added a warning that specifically
details the fact that the semantics have changed and that we provide the newer
semantics.
Fixes PR8842.
llvm-svn: 218905
In addition to __builtin_assume_aligned, GCC also supports an assume_aligned
attribute which specifies the alignment (and optional offset) of a function's
return value. Here we implement support for the assume_aligned attribute by making
use of the @llvm.assume intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 218500
we were failing to find that bit-field when performing integer promotions. This
brings us closer to following the standard, and closer to GCC.
In C, this change is technically a regression: we get bit-field promotions
completely wrong in C, promoting cases that are categorically not bit-field
designators. This change makes us do so slightly more consistently, though.
llvm-svn: 218428
Fixes PR21027. The MIDL compiler produces code that does this.
If we wanted to improve the warning, I think we could do this:
void __stdcall f(); // Don't warn without -Wstrict-prototypes.
void g() {
f(); // Might warn, the user probably meant for f to take no args.
f(1, 2, 3); // Warn, we have no idea what args f takes.
f(1); // Error, this is insane, one of these calls is broken.
}
Reviewers: thakis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5481
llvm-svn: 218394
Summary:
This fixes PR20023. In order to implement this scoping rule, we piggy
back on the existing LabelDecl machinery, by creating LabelDecl's that
will carry the "internal" name of the inline assembly label, which we
will rewrite the asm label to.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4589
llvm-svn: 218230
According to lore, we used to verifier-fail on:
void __thiscall f();
int main() { f(1); }
So that's fixed now. System headers use prototype-less __stdcall functions,
so make that a warning that's DefaultError -- then it fires on regular code
but is suppressed in system headers.
Since it's used in system headers, we have codegen tests for this; massage
them slightly so that they still compile.
llvm-svn: 218166
Previously, we would not mark structs containing anonymous structs as
invalid. Later, horrific things would occur when trying to determine
the size of the parent record.
Instead, require the struct to be a complete type when used as an
anonymous struct. Mark both the anonymous field for the struct and the
parent context as invalid (this is similar to what we do when a struct
contains a field with an incomplete type.)
This fixes PR11847.
llvm-svn: 218006
for __builtin___strlcpy_chk/__builtin___strlcat_chk.
Patch by Jacques Fortier with monir change by me and
addition of test. rdar://18259539
llvm-svn: 217700
Summary: This fixes PR20883.
Test Plan: The patch includes an automated test.
Reviewers: hansw
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5256
llvm-svn: 217413
Temporarily comment out the test for really-large powers of two. This seems to
be host-sensitive for some reason... trying to fix the clang-i386-freebsd
builder.
llvm-svn: 217351
This makes use of the recently-added @llvm.assume intrinsic to implement a
__builtin_assume(bool) intrinsic (to provide additional information to the
optimizer). This hooks up __assume in MS-compatibility mode to mirror
__builtin_assume (the semantics have been intentionally kept compatible), and
implements GCC's __builtin_assume_aligned as assume((p - o) & mask == 0). LLVM
now contains special logic to deal with assumptions of this form.
llvm-svn: 217349
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
Naked functions don't have prologues or epilogues, so doing
codegen for anything other than inline assembly would be completely
hit or miss.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5183
llvm-svn: 217199
This shouldn't really be allowed, but it comes up in real code (see PR). As
long as the decl hasn't been used there's no technical difficulty in supporting
it, so downgrade the error to a warning.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5087
llvm-svn: 216619
the no-arguments case. Don't expand this to an __attribute__((nonnull(A, B,
C))) attribute, since that does the wrong thing for function templates and
varargs functions.
In passing, fix a grammar error in the diagnostic, a crash if
__attribute__((nonnull(N))) is applied to a varargs function,
a bug where the same null argument could be diagnosed multiple
times if there were multiple nonnull attributes referring to it,
and a bug where nonnull attributes would not be accumulated correctly
across redeclarations.
llvm-svn: 216520
David Majnemer