RegionStoreManager::Retrieve() that was intended to handle conflated uses of pointers as integers.
It turns out this isn't needed, and resulted in inconsistent behavior when creating symbolic values on the following test case in 'tests/Analysis/misc-ps.m':
typedef struct _BStruct { void *grue; } BStruct;
void testB_aux(void *ptr);
void testB(BStruct *b) {
{
int *__gruep__ = ((int *)&((b)->grue));
int __gruev__ = *__gruep__;
testB_aux(__gruep__);
}
{
int *__gruep__ = ((int *)&((b)->grue));
int __gruev__ = *__gruep__;
if (~0 != __gruev__) {}
}
}
When the code was analyzed with '-arch x86_64', the value assigned to '__gruev__' be would be a
symbolic integer, but for '-arch i386' the value assigned to '__gruev__' would be a symbolic region
(a blob of memory). With this change the value created is always a symbolic integer.
Since the code being removed was added to support analysis of code calling
OSAtomicCompareAndSwapXXX(), I also modified 'test/Analysis/NSString.m' to analyze the code in both
'-arch i386' and '-arch x86_64', and also added some complementary test cases to test the presence
of leaks when using OSAtomicCompareAndSwap32Barrier()/OSAtomicCompareAndSwap64Barrier() instead of
just their absence. This code change reveals that previously both RegionStore and BasicStore were
handling these cases wrong, and would never cause the analyzer to emit a leak in these cases (false
negatives). Now RegionStore gets it right, but BasicStore still gets it wrong (and hence it has been
disabled temporarily for this test case).
llvm-svn: 84163
struct A { };
struct B : A { };
void f() {
const A& a = B();
}
correctly. (This now does the offset conversion if necessary and calls the destructor when a goes out of scope).
llvm-svn: 84162
header is just the entry block to the loop, and it needn't be at
the top of the loop in the code layout.
Remove the code that suppressed loop alignment for outer loops,
so that outer loops are aligned.
llvm-svn: 84158
the virtual base so they can be reused properly. Don't reuse vcall
slots across a virtual boundary. WIP. I have a testcase, but there
are still things that need to be fixed before the testcase can go in.
llvm-svn: 84120
template, make sure to get the template that corresponds to *this*
declaration of the class template or specialization, rather than the
canonical specialization. Fixes PR5187.
llvm-svn: 84119
to a member operator template. We missed updating this call site when
adding support for function templates; bug exposed by a test for
PR5072.
llvm-svn: 84111
so get rid of eh.selector.i64 and rename eh.selector.i32 to eh.selector.
Likewise for eh.typeid.for. This aligns us with gcc, which always uses a
32 bit value for the selector on all platforms. My understanding is that
the register allocator used to assert if the selector intrinsic size didn't
match the pointer size, and this was the reason for introducing the two
variants. However my testing shows that this is no longer the case (I
fixed some bugs in selector lowering yesterday, and some more today in the
fastisel path; these might have caused the original problems).
llvm-svn: 84106
Ted Kremenek