Summary:
Add support for autocompleting values of -std= by including
LangStandards.def. This patch relies on D36782, and is using two-stage
code generation.
Reviewers: v.g.vassilev, teemperor, ruiu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36820
llvm-svn: 311971
The standard is not clear on how these are supposed to be handled, so we
conservatively treat as non-constant any cases whose value is unknown or whose
evaluation might result in undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 311970
This reverts commit 7c46b80c022e18d43c1fdafb117b0c409c5a6d1e.
r311552 broke lld buildbot because I've changed OptionInfos type from
ArrayRef to vector. However the bug is fixed, so I'll commit this again.
llvm-svn: 311958
Replace "long" with __UINTPTR_TYPE__
to make the test added in rL311935 Windows-friendly.
Caught by the buildbot llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win.
llvm-svn: 311947
This diff fixes modeling of arithmetic
expressions where pointers are treated as integers
(i.e. via C-style / reinterpret casts).
For now we return UnknownVal unless the operation is a comparison.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37120
llvm-svn: 311935
Use llvm::Triple::getArchTypeName() when looking for compiler-rt
libraries, rather than the exact arch string from the triple. This is
more correct as it matches the values used when building compiler-rt
(builtin-config-ix.cmake) which are the subset of the values allowed
in triples.
For example, this fixes an issue when the compiler set for
i686-pc-linux-gnu triple would not find an i386 compiler-rt library,
while this is the exact arch that is detected by compiler-rt. The same
applies to any other i?86 variant allowed by LLVM.
This also makes the special case for MSVC unnecessary, since now i386
will be used reliably for all 32-bit x86 variants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26796
llvm-svn: 311923
Diagnostic Categories are fairly annoying, and are only enforced
by a runtime-debug-only assert. This puts in a touch more work
to get this all done at compile-time with static asserts
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37122
llvm-svn: 311905
It caused PR759744.
> Emit static constexpr member as available_externally definition
>
> By exposing the constant initializer, the optimizer can fold many
> of these constructs.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34992
llvm-svn: 311898
This patch implements the initial support for refactoring action rules. The
first rule that's supported is a "source change" rule that returns a set of
atomic changes. This patch is based on the ideas presented in my RFC:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-July/054831.html
The following pieces from the RFC are added by this patch:
- `createRefactoringRule` (known as `apply` in the RFC)
- `requiredSelection` refactoring action rule requirement.
- `selection::SourceSelectionRange` selection constraint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36075
llvm-svn: 311884
This way the unrolling can be restricted for loops which will take at most a
given number of steps. It is defined as 128 in this patch and it seems to have
a good number for that purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37181
llvm-svn: 311883
Added check if the execution of the last step of the given unrolled loop has
generated more branches. If yes, than treat it as a normal (non-unrolled) loop
in the remaining part of the analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36962
llvm-svn: 311881
1. The LoopUnrolling feature needs the LoopExit included in the CFG so added this
dependency via the config options
2. The LoopExit element can be encountered even if we haven't encountered the
block of the corresponding LoopStmt. So the asserts were not right.
3. If we are caching out the Node then we get a nullptr from generateNode which
case was not handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37103
llvm-svn: 311880
This adds builtin_cpu_init which will emit a call to cpu_indicator_init in libgcc or compiler-rt.
This is needed to support builtin_cpu_supports/builtin_cpu_is in an ifunc resolver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36336
llvm-svn: 311874
By exposing the constant initializer, the optimizer can fold many
of these constructs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34992
llvm-svn: 311857
Prior to this patch clang would not error here:
template <class T> struct B;
template <class T> struct A {
void foo();
void foo2();
void test1() {
B<T>::foo(); // OK, foo is declared in A<int> - matches type of 'this'.
B<T>::foo2(); // This should be an error!
// foo2 is found in B<int>, 'base unrelated' to 'this'.
}
};
template <class T> struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::foo2;
};
llvm-svn: 311851
This allows multi-module / incremental compilation environments to have unique
initializer symbols.
Patch by Axel Naumann with minor modifications by me!
llvm-svn: 311844
When isIncrementalProcessingEnabled is on we might want to produce multiple
llvm::Modules. This patch allows the clients to start a new llvm::Module,
allowing CodeGen to continue working after a HandleEndOfTranslationUnit call.
This should give the necessary facilities to write a unittest for D34059.
As discussed in the review this is meant to give us a way to proceed forward
in our efforts to upstream our interpreter-related patches. The design of this
will likely change soon.
llvm-svn: 311843
Prior to this patch, clang would do the wrong thing here (see inline comments for pre-patch behavior):
struct A {
void bar(int) { }
static void bar(double) { }
void g(int*);
static void g(char *);
};
struct B {
void f() {
A::bar(3); // selects (double) ??!!
A::g((int*)0); // Instead of no object argument, states conversion error?!!
}
};
The fix is as follows: When we detect that what appears to be an implicit member function call (A::bar) is actually a call to a member of a class (A) unrelated to the type (B) that contains the member function (B::f) from which the call is being made, don't treat it (A::bar) as an Implicit Member Call Expression.
P.S. I wonder if there is an existing bug report related to this? (Surprisingly, a cursory search did not find one).
llvm-svn: 311839
Use llvm::Triple::getArchTypeName() when looking for compiler-rt
libraries, rather than the exact arch string from the triple. This is
more correct as it matches the values used when building compiler-rt
(builtin-config-ix.cmake) which are the subset of the values allowed
in triples.
For example, this fixes an issue when the compiler set for
i686-pc-linux-gnu triple would not find an i386 compiler-rt library,
while this is the exact arch that is detected by compiler-rt. The same
applies to any other i?86 variant allowed by LLVM.
This also makes the special case for MSVC unnecessary, since now i386
will be used reliably for all 32-bit x86 variants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26796
llvm-svn: 311836
This patch adds a flag -fclang-abi-compat that can be used to request that
Clang attempts to be ABI-compatible with some older version of itself.
This is provided on a best-effort basis; right now, this can be used to undo
the ABI change in r310401, reverting Clang to its prior C++ ABI for pass/return
by value of class types affected by that change, and to undo the ABI change in
r262688, reverting Clang to using integer registers rather than SSE registers
for passing <1 x long long> vectors. The intent is that we will maintain this
backwards compatibility path as we make ABI-breaking fixes in future.
The reversion to the old behavior for r310401 is also applied to the PS4 target
since that change is not part of its platform ABI (which is essentially to do
whatever Clang 3.2 did).
llvm-svn: 311823
alignments
Indent should be compared before nesting level to determine if a token
is on the same scope as the one we align with. Because it was inverted,
clang-format sometimes tried to align tokens with tokens from outer
scopes, causing the assert(Shift >= 0) to fire.
This fixes bug #33507. Patch by Beren Minor, thank you!
llvm-svn: 311792
In ASTUnit::LoadFromASTFile, the context object is set up using
default-constructed LangOptions (which only later get populated). As the
language options are used in the constructor of PrintingPolicy, this
needs to be updated explicitly after the language options are available.
Patch by Johann Klähn!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35271
llvm-svn: 311787
-Wobjc-messaging-id is a new, non-default warning that warns about
message sends to unqualified id in Objective-C. This warning is useful
for projects that would like to avoid any potential future compiler
errors/warnings, as the system frameworks might add a method with the same
selector which could make the message send to id ambiguous.
rdar://33303354
llvm-svn: 311779
Clang's DiagnosticError is an llvm::Error payload that stores a partial
diagnostic and its location. I'll be using it in the refactoring engine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36969
llvm-svn: 311778
expressions
C++ allows us to reference static variables through member expressions. Prior to
this commit, non-integer static variables that were referenced using a member
expression were always emitted using lvalue loads. The old behaviour introduced
an inconsistency between regular uses of static variables and member expressions
uses. For example, the following program compiled and linked successfully:
struct Foo {
constexpr static const char *name = "foo";
};
int main() {
return Foo::name[0] == 'f';
}
but this program failed to link because "Foo::name" wasn't found:
struct Foo {
constexpr static const char *name = "foo";
};
int main() {
Foo f;
return f.name[0] == 'f';
}
This commit ensures that constant static variables referenced through member
expressions are emitted in the same way as ordinary static variable references.
rdar://33942261
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36876
llvm-svn: 311772
Summary:
If await_suspend returns a coroutine_handle, as in the example below:
```
coroutine_handle<> await_suspend(coroutine_handle<> h) {
coro.promise().waiter = h;
return coro;
}
```
suspensionExpression processing will resume the coroutine pointed at by that handle.
Related LLVM change rL311751 makes resume calls of this kind `musttail` at any optimization level.
This enables unlimited symmetric control transfer from coroutine to coroutine without blowing up the stack.
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rsmith, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37131
llvm-svn: 311762
Yuka Takahashi