This patch, adds support for DW_AT_alignment[DWARF5] attribute, to be emitted with typdef DIE.
When explicit alignment is specified.
Patch by Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, jini.susan.george, SouraVX, alok,
deadalinx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70111
Summary:
This patch redefines freeze instruction from being UnaryOperator to a subclass of UnaryInstruction.
ConstantExpr freeze is removed, as discussed in the previous review.
FreezeOperator is not added because there's no ConstantExpr freeze.
`freeze i8* null` test is added to `test/Bindings/llvm-c/freeze.ll` as well, because the null pointer-related bug in `tools/llvm-c/echo.cpp` is now fixed.
InstVisitor has visitFreeze now because freeze is not unaryop anymore.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix, craig.topper, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: craig.topper, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: regehr, nlopes, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69932
Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374784
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374743
Note that we are not sure where the tests for these functions lives. This was discussed in the Phab Diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68588
llvm-svn: 373969
atomicrmw and cmpxchg have a volatile flag, so allow them to be get and set with LLVM{Get,Set}Volatile. atomicrmw and fence have orderings, so allow them to be get and set with LLVM{Get,Set}Ordering. Add missing LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFAdd and LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFSub enum constants. AtomicCmpXchg also has a weak flag, add a getter/setter for that too. Add a getter/setter for the binary-op of an atomicrmw.
atomicrmw and cmpxchg have a volatile flag, so allow it to be set/get with LLVMGetVolatile and LLVMSetVolatile. Add missing LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFAdd and LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFSub enum constants. AtomicCmpXchg also has a weak flag, add a getter/setter for that too. Add a getter/setter for the binary-op of an atomicrmw.
Add LLVMIsA## for CatchSwitchInst, CallBrInst and FenceInst, as well as AtomicCmpXchgInst and AtomicRMWInst.
Update llvm-c-test to include atomicrmw and fence, and to copy volatile for the four applicable instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67132
llvm-svn: 372938
DIFlagBlockByRefStruct is an unused DIFlag that originally was used by
clang to express (Objective-)C block captures in debug info. For the
last year Clang has been emitting complex DIExpressions to describe
block captures instead, which makes all the code supporting this flag
redundant.
This patch removes the flag and all supporting "dead" code, so we can
reuse the bit for something else in the future.
Since this only affects debug info generated by Clang with the block
extension this mostly affects Apple platforms and I don't have any
bitcode compatibility concerns for removing this. The Verifier will
reject debug info that uses the bit and thus degrade gracefully when
LTO'ing older bitcode with a newer compiler.
rdar://problem/44304813
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67453
llvm-svn: 372272
Summary:
This is needed to implemented the same approach as lld (implemented in r338434)
for how to handling symbols that can be generated by LTO code generator
but not present in the symbol table for linker that uses legacy C APIs.
libLTO is in charge of providing the list of symbols. Linker is in
charge of implementing the eager loading from static libraries using
the list of symbols.
rdar://problem/52853974
Reviewers: tejohnson, bd1976llvm, deadalnix, espindola
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, dang, kledzik, mehdi_amini, inglorion, jkorous, dexonsmith, ributzka, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67568
llvm-svn: 372021
The bitstream remark serializer landed in r367372.
This adds a bitstream remark parser that parser bitstream remark files
to llvm::remarks::Remark objects through the RemarkParser interface.
A few interesting things to point out:
* There are parsing helpers to parse the different types of blocks
* The main parsing helper allows us to parse remark metadata and open an
external file containing the encoded remarks
* This adds a dependency from the Remarks library to the BitstreamReader
library
* The testing strategy is to create a remark entry through YAML, parse
it, serialize it to bitstream, parse that back and compare the objects.
* There are close to no tests for malformed bitstream remarks, due to
the lack of textual format for the bitstream format.
* This adds a new C API for parsing bitstream remarks:
LLVMRemarkParserCreateBitstream.
* This bumps the REMARKS_API_VERSION to 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67134
llvm-svn: 371429
Summary: This exposes `CallInst`'s tail call kind via new `LLVMGetTailCallKind` and `LLVMSetTailCallKind` functions. The motivation for this is to be able to see `musttail` for languages that require mandatory tail calls for correctness. Today only the weaker `LLVMSetTail` is exposed and there is no way to set `GuaranteedTailCallOpt` via the C API.
Reviewers: CodaFi, jyknight, deadalnix, rnk
Reviewed By: CodaFi
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66061
llvm-svn: 368945
Summary: Adds a binding to the internalize pass that allows the caller to pass a function pointer that acts as the visibility-preservation predicate. Previously, one could only pass an unsigned value (not LLVMBool?) that directed the pass to consider "main" or not.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix, harlanhaskins
Reviewed By: whitequark, harlanhaskins
Subscribers: kren1, hiraditya, llvm-commits, harlanhaskins
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62456
llvm-svn: 366777
Before, everything was based on some kind of type erased parser
implementation which container a lot of boilerplate code when multiple
formats were to be supported.
This simplifies it by:
* the remark now owns its arguments
* *always* returning an error from the implementation side
* working around the way the YAML parser reports errors: catch them through
callbacks and re-insert them in a proper llvm::Error
* add a CParser wrapper that is used when implementing the C API to
avoid cluttering the C++ API with useless state
* LLVMRemarkParserGetNext now returns an object that needs to be
released to avoid leaking resources
* add a new API to dispose of a remark entry: LLVMRemarkEntryDispose
llvm-svn: 366217
Dependent libraries support for the legacy api was committed in a
broken state (see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60274). This was missed
due to the painful nature of having to integrate the changes into a
linker in order to test. This change implements support for dependent
libraries in the legacy LTO api:
- I have removed the current api function, which returns a single
string, and added functions to access each dependent library
specifier individually.
- To reduce the testing pain, I have made the api functions as thin as
possible to maximize coverage from llvm-lto.
- When doing ThinLTO the system linker will load the modules lazily
when scanning the input files. Unfortunately, when modules are
lazily loaded there is no access to module level named metadata. To
fix this I have added api functions that allow querying the IRSymtab
for the dependent libraries. I hope to expand the api in the future
so that, eventually, all the information needed by a client linker
during scan can be retrieved from the IRSymtab.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62935
llvm-svn: 363140
This patch implements a limited form of autolinking primarily designed to allow
either the --dependent-library compiler option, or "comment lib" pragmas (
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/comment-c-cpp?view=vs-2017) in
C/C++ e.g. #pragma comment(lib, "foo"), to cause an ELF linker to automatically
add the specified library to the link when processing the input file generated
by the compiler.
Currently this extension is unique to LLVM and LLD. However, care has been taken
to design this feature so that it could be supported by other ELF linkers.
The design goals were to provide:
- A simple linking model for developers to reason about.
- The ability to to override autolinking from the linker command line.
- Source code compatibility, where possible, with "comment lib" pragmas in other
environments (MSVC in particular).
Dependent library support is implemented differently for ELF platforms than on
the other platforms. Primarily this difference is that on ELF we pass the
dependent library specifiers directly to the linker without manipulating them.
This is in contrast to other platforms where they are mapped to a specific
linker option by the compiler. This difference is a result of the greater
variety of ELF linkers and the fact that ELF linkers tend to handle libraries in
a more complicated fashion than on other platforms. This forces us to defer
handling the specifiers to the linker.
In order to achieve a level of source code compatibility with other platforms
we have restricted this feature to work with libraries that meet the following
"reasonable" requirements:
1. There are no competing defined symbols in a given set of libraries, or
if they exist, the program owner doesn't care which is linked to their
program.
2. There may be circular dependencies between libraries.
The binary representation is a mergeable string section (SHF_MERGE,
SHF_STRINGS), called .deplibs, with custom type SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
(0x6fff4c04). The compiler forms this section by concatenating the arguments of
the "comment lib" pragmas and --dependent-library options in the order they are
encountered. Partial (-r, -Ur) links are handled by concatenating .deplibs
sections with the normal mergeable string section rules. As an example, #pragma
comment(lib, "foo") would result in:
.section ".deplibs","MS",@llvm_dependent_libraries,1
.asciz "foo"
For LTO, equivalent information to the contents of a the .deplibs section can be
retrieved by the LLD for bitcode input files.
LLD processes the dependent library specifiers in the following way:
1. Dependent libraries which are found from the specifiers in .deplibs sections
of relocatable object files are added when the linker decides to include that
file (which could itself be in a library) in the link. Dependent libraries
behave as if they were appended to the command line after all other options. As
a consequence the set of dependent libraries are searched last to resolve
symbols.
2. It is an error if a file cannot be found for a given specifier.
3. Any command line options in effect at the end of the command line parsing apply
to the dependent libraries, e.g. --whole-archive.
4. The linker tries to add a library or relocatable object file from each of the
strings in a .deplibs section by; first, handling the string as if it was
specified on the command line; second, by looking for the string in each of the
library search paths in turn; third, by looking for a lib<string>.a or
lib<string>.so (depending on the current mode of the linker) in each of the
library search paths.
5. A new command line option --no-dependent-libraries tells LLD to ignore the
dependent libraries.
Rationale for the above points:
1. Adding the dependent libraries last makes the process simple to understand
from a developers perspective. All linkers are able to implement this scheme.
2. Error-ing for libraries that are not found seems like better behavior than
failing the link during symbol resolution.
3. It seems useful for the user to be able to apply command line options which
will affect all of the dependent libraries. There is a potential problem of
surprise for developers, who might not realize that these options would apply
to these "invisible" input files; however, despite the potential for surprise,
this is easy for developers to reason about and gives developers the control
that they may require.
4. This algorithm takes into account all of the different ways that ELF linkers
find input files. The different search methods are tried by the linker in most
obvious to least obvious order.
5. I considered adding finer grained control over which dependent libraries were
ignored (e.g. MSVC has /nodefaultlib:<library>); however, I concluded that this
is not necessary: if finer control is required developers can fall back to using
the command line directly.
RFC thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/131004.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60274
llvm-svn: 360984
In C a function declaration with an empty argument list isn't a real
prototype, it will allow calling the function with any number of
arguments. It will also cause warnings when used in C code compiled with
'-Wstrict-prototypes'
Reviewed By: whitequark
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61568
llvm-svn: 360012
Summary: There is still some value in using these functions while the remaining LLVMValueRef-based accessors are still around, but LLVMMDNodeInContext in particular has some wonky semantics that make it worth replacing outright.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60524
llvm-svn: 359114
Summary:
Add accessors for the file, directory, source file name (curiously, an `Optional` value?), of a DIFile.
This is intended to replace the LLVMValueRef-based accessors used in D52239
Reviewers: whitequark, jberdine, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark, jberdine
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60489
llvm-svn: 358577
Summary: Metadata for a global variable is really a (GlobalVariable, Expression) tuple. Allow access to these, then allow retrieving the file, scope, and line for a DIVariable, whether global or local. This should be the last of the accessors required for uniform access to location and file information metadata.
Reviewers: jberdine, whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: jberdine, whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60725
llvm-svn: 358532
Summary: Deprecate the existing accessors for the "current debug location" of an IRBuilder. The setter could not handle being reset to NULL, and the getter would create bogus metadata if the NULL location was returned. Provide direct metadata-based accessors instead.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60484
llvm-svn: 358039
Summary: Provide direct accessors to supplement LLVMSetInstDebugLocation. In addition, properly accept and return the NULL location. The old accessors provided no way to do this, so the current debug location cannot currently be cleared.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60481
llvm-svn: 358038
Summary: This brings us to full feature parity with the old API, so I've deprecated it and updated the tests. I'll do a follow-up patch to do some more cleanup and documentation work in this header.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60407
llvm-svn: 358037
COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.
COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J
For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.
@alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33!14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
!20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
!25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
!27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
!29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
!30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
!31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
!32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
!33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)
The DWARF generated for this is as follows.
DW_TAG_common_block:
DW_AT_name: alpha
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: common alpha
DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: i
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: j
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4
Patch by Eric Schweitz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327
llvm-svn: 357934
Summary: Add an accessor for the type of a binary file.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, aheejin, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60366
llvm-svn: 357872
Summary:
Provides a new type, `LLVMBinaryRef`, and a binding to `llvm::object::createBinary` for more general interoperation with binary files than `LLVMObjectFileRef`. It also provides the proper non-consuming API for input buffers and populates an out parameter for error handling if necessary - two things the previous API did not do.
In a follow-up, I'll define section and symbol iterators and begin to build upon the existing test infrastructure.
This patch is a first step towards deprecating that API and replacing it with something more robust.
Reviewers: deadalnix, whitequark
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60322
llvm-svn: 357822
Summary:
Now that we can create standalone basic blocks, it's useful to be able to append them. Add bindings to
- Insert a basic block after the current insertion block
- Append a basic block to the end of a function's list of basic blocks
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix, harlanhaskins
Reviewed By: whitequark, harlanhaskins
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59658
llvm-svn: 357812
Summary: Add a binding to Function::lookupIntrinsicID so clients don't have to go searching the ID table themselves.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59697
llvm-svn: 356948
Our minimum MSVC toolchain requirement is greater than 2015, so we don't
need this conditional macro anymore. New versions of MSVC apparently
have a header, xkeycheck.h, to check that keywords haven't been
redefined.
Fixes PR41144
llvm-svn: 356524
This adds a Remark class that allows us to share code when working with
remarks.
The C API has been updated to reflect this. Instead of the parser
generating C structs, it's now using a C++ object that is used through
opaque pointers in C. This gives us much more flexibility on what
changes we can make to the internal state of the object and interacts
much better with scenarios where the library is used through dlopen.
* C API updates:
* move from C structs to opaque pointers and functions
* the remark type is now an enum instead of a string
* unit tests updates:
* use mostly the C++ API
* keep one test for the C API
* rename to YAMLRemarksParsingTest
* a typo was fixed: AnalysisFPCompute -> AnalysisFPCommute.
* a new error message was added: "expected a remark tag."
* llvm-opt-report has been updated to use the C++ parser instead of the
C API
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59049
Original llvm-svn: 356491
llvm-svn: 356519
This adds a Remark class that allows us to share code when working with
remarks.
The C API has been updated to reflect this. Instead of the parser
generating C structs, it's now using a C++ object that is used through
opaque pointers in C. This gives us much more flexibility on what
changes we can make to the internal state of the object and interacts
much better with scenarios where the library is used through dlopen.
* C API updates:
* move from C structs to opaque pointers and functions
* the remark type is now an enum instead of a string
* unit tests updates:
* use mostly the C++ API
* keep one test for the C API
* rename to YAMLRemarksParsingTest
* a typo was fixed: AnalysisFPCompute -> AnalysisFPCommute.
* a new error message was added: "expected a remark tag."
* llvm-opt-report has been updated to use the C++ parser instead of the
C API
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59049
llvm-svn: 356491
Moving subprogram specific flags into DISPFlags makes IR code more readable.
In addition, we provide free space in DIFlags for other
'non-subprogram-specific' debug info flags.
Patch by Djordje Todorovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59288
llvm-svn: 356454
Summary: Add bindings to create a wrapped "Add Discriminators" pass. Now that we have debug info support, this is a handy transform to have.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: dblaikie, aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58624
llvm-svn: 356272
Getting rid of the name "optimization remarks" for anything that
involves handling remarks on the client side.
It's safer to do this now, before we get stuck with that name in all the
APIs and public interfaces we decide to export to users in the future.
This renames llvm/tools/opt-remarks to llvm/tools/remarks-shlib, and now
generates `libRemarks.dylib` instead of `libOptRemarks.dylib`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58535
llvm-svn: 355439
Summary: The C API don't have the bindings to create enumerators, needed to create an enumeration.
Reviewers: whitequark, CodaFi, harlanhaskins, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark, CodaFi, harlanhaskins
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58323
llvm-svn: 354237
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
Sam McCall