Which is needed if we want to replace darwin’s nm(1) with llvm-nm
as there are many uses of grouped flags. The added test case is
one specific case that is in real use.
rdar://23337419
llvm-svn: 251864
This was causing a variety of test failures when v2i64
is added as a legal type.
SIFixSGPRCopies should correctly handle the case of vector inputs
to a scalar reg_sequence, so this isn't necessary anymore. This
was hiding some deficiencies in how reg_sequence is handled later,
but this shouldn't be a problem anymore since the register class
copy of a reg_sequence is now done before the reg_sequence.
llvm-svn: 251860
I've found myself pointlessly debugging problems from running
graphics tests with an HSA triple a few times, so stop this from
happening again.
llvm-svn: 251858
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251857
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first attempt got a test failure on ARM. This patch is updated to try to fix the failure (more specifically, by handling the case when VF=1).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8943
llvm-svn: 251850
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251849
Summary:
The hasBase and hasIndex don't tell anything about the position of the
base and the index in the code, so we need hasLHS and hasRHS in some cases.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14212
llvm-svn: 251842
This reverts commit r251837, due to a number of bot failures of the form:
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to
'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::create(llvm::MemoryBufferRef,
llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*, bool)'
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to 'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::takeIndex()'
I'm not sure why these are happening - I added Object to the requred
libraries in tools/llvm-link/LLVMBuild.txt and the LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
in tools/llvm-link/CMakeLists.txt. Confirmed for my build that these
symbols come out of libLLVMObject.a. What am I missing?
llvm-svn: 251841
This has apparently been broken since June, but only on non-Windows.
Perhaps nobody noticed it because if the symlink is already there
it won't try to re-create it, and nobody ever tried doing a clean
build.
In any case, I will let the original author attempt to fix this if
he is still interested. the problem is that in the normal case
of not setting BUILD_SHARED_LIBS and simply running ninja, it would
link _lldb.so to a non-existent location, creating a dangling
symlink.
llvm-svn: 251840
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
llvm-svn: 251839
Summary:
Support for necessary linkage changes and symbol renaming during
ThinLTO function importing.
Also includes llvm-link support for manually importing functions
and associated llvm-link based tests.
Note that this does not include support for intelligently importing
metadata, which is currently imported duplicate times. That support will
be in the follow-on patch, and currently is ignored by the tests.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph, davidxl
Subscribers: tobiasvk, tejohnson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13515
llvm-svn: 251837
In the current BB placement algorithm, a loop chain always contains all loop blocks. This has a drawback that cold blocks in the loop may be inserted on a hot function path, hence increasing branch cost and also reducing icache locality.
Consider a simple example shown below:
A
|
B⇆C
|
D
When B->C is quite cold, the best BB-layout should be A,B,D,C. But the current implementation produces A,C,B,D.
This patch filters those cold blocks off from the loop chain by comparing the ratio:
LoopBBFreq / LoopFreq
to 20%: if it is less than 20%, we don't include this BB to the loop chain. Here LoopFreq is the frequency of the loop when we reduce the loop into a single node. In general we have more cold blocks when the loop has few iterations. And vice versa.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11662
llvm-svn: 251833
This came up in a boost build, which apparently uses PTH. This was
broken in r187619 when we migrated it to uses llvm::fs instead of raw
stat calls.
Constructing a test case with a hash table collision in-tree is tough.
Instead, I have a pending change to OnDiskChainedHashTable that asserts
that the reported length of the data agrees with the data actually
written. All of the existing in-tree tests find the bug with this
assert.
llvm-svn: 251828
unaffected lines with incorrect initial indent.
Starting from:
namespace {
int i; // There shouldn't be indentation here.
int j; // <- call clang-format on this line.
}
Before:
namespace {
int i;
int j;
}
After:
namespace {
int i;
int j;
}
llvm-svn: 251824
I think the underlying problem was fixed by r251819, but I can't
reproduce the problem. So this is to check whether it does in
fact fix the problem.
llvm-svn: 251822
The Go interpreter doesn't JIT or use LLVM, so this also
moves all the JIT related code from UserExpression to a new class LLVMUserExpression.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13073
Fix merge
llvm-svn: 251820
packages/Python/lldbsuite is now a Python package, and it relies
on its __init__.py being called to do package-level initialization.
If you exec packages/Python/lldbsuite/dotest.py directly, you won't
get this package level initialization, and things will fail. But
without this patch, this is exactly what dosep itself does. To
launch the multi-processing fork, it was hardcoding a path to
dotest.py and exec'ing it from inside the package.
The fix here is to get the path of the top-level script, and
then exec'ing that instead. A more robust solution would involve
refactoring the code so that dosep execs some internal script that
imports lldbsuite, but that's a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14157
Reviewed by: Todd Fiala
llvm-svn: 251819
1) PR25154. This is basically a repeat of PR18102, which was fixed in
r200201, and broken again by r234430. The latter changed which of the
store nodes was merged into from the first to the last. Thus, we now
also need to prefer merging a later store at a given address into the
target node, instead of an earlier one.
2) While investigating that, I also realized I'd introduced a bug in
r236850. There, I removed a check for alignment -- not realizing that
nothing except the alignment check was ensuring that none of the stores
were overlapping! This is a really bogus way to ensure there's no
aliased stores.
A better solution to both of these issues is likely to always use the
code added in the 'if (UseAA)' branches which rearrange the chain based
on a more principled analysis. I'll look into whether that can be used
always, but in the interest of getting things back to working, I think a
minimal change makes sense.
llvm-svn: 251816
Teresa Johnson