https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E53394_01/html/E54766/u-etext-3c.html
It is said that:
_etext - The address of _etext is the first
location after the last read-only loadable segment.
_edata - The address of _edata is the first
location after the last read-write loadable segment.
_end - If the address of _edata is greater than the address
of _etext, the address of _end is same as the address of _edata.
In real life _end and _edata has different values for that case.
Both gold/bfd set _edata to the end of the last non SHT_NOBITS section.
This patch do the same for consistency.
It should fix the https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26729.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17601
llvm-svn: 262019
This patch implements the same algorithm as LLD/COFF's ICF. I'm
not going to repeat the same description about how it works, so you
want to read the comment in ICF.cpp in this patch if you want to know
the details. This algorithm should be more powerful than the ICF
algorithm implemented in GNU gold. It can even merge mutually-recursive
functions (which is harder than one might think).
ICF is a fairly effective size optimization. Here are some examples.
LLD: 37.14 MB -> 35.80 MB (-3.6%)
Clang: 59.41 MB -> 57.80 MB (-2.7%)
The lacking feature is "safe" version of ICF. This merges all
identical sections. That is not compatible with a C/C++ language
requirement that two distinct functions must have distinct addresses.
But as long as your program do not rely on the pointer equality
(which is in many cases true), your program should work with the
feature. LLD works fine for example.
GNU gold implements so-called "safe ICF" that identifies functions
that are safe to merge by heuristics -- for example, gold thinks
that constructors are safe to merge because there is no way to
take an address of a constructor in C++. We have a different idea
which David Majnemer suggested that we add NOPs at beginning of
merged functions so that two or more pointers can have distinct
values. We can do whichever we want, but this patch does not
include neither.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17529
llvm-svn: 261912
This patch moves BitcodeFile instantiation into createObjectFile.
Previously, we handle bitcode files outside that function and did
not handle for --whole-archive.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17527
llvm-svn: 261663
This is the function equivalent of a copy relocation.
Since functions are expected to change sizes, we cannot use copy
relocations. In situations where one would be needed, what is done
instead is:
* Create a plt entry
* Output an undefined symbol whose addr is the plt entry.
The dynamic linker makes sure any shared library uses the plt entry as
the function address.
llvm-svn: 260224
The variable was marking various cases where a symbol must be included
in the dynamic symbol table. Being used by a dynamic relocation was only
one of them.
llvm-svn: 259889
-Bsymbolic-functions:
When creating a shared library, bind references to global
function symbols to the definition within the shared library, if any.
This patch also fixed behavior of already existent -Bsymbolic:
previously PLT entries were created even if -Bsymbolic was specified.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16411
llvm-svn: 259481
If object files are drawn from archive files, the error message should
be something like "conflict symbols in foo.a(bar.o) and baz.o" instead
of "conflict symbols in bar.o and baz.o". This patch implements that.
llvm-svn: 259475
Previously, the methods to get symbol addresses were somewhat scattered
in many places. You can use getEntryAddr returns the address of the symbol,
but if you want to get the GOT address for the symbol, you needed to call
Out<ELFT>::Got->getEntryAddr(Sym). This change adds new functions, getVA,
getGotVA, getGotPltVA, and getPltVA to SymbolBody, so that you can use
SymbolBody as the central place to ask about symbols.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16710
llvm-svn: 259404
Main executable did not export symbols that exist both in the main executable and in DSOs before this patch.
Symbols from object files that override symbols in DSO should be added to .dynsym table.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16405
llvm-svn: 258672
It seems that __cxa_demangle function on the buildbot tried to demangle
a variable "tlsvar" as a C++ symbol. Do not call that function unless
it does not start with "_Z" which is the prefix of mangled names.
llvm-svn: 257661
On MIPS O32 ABI, _gp_disp is a magic symbol designates offset between
start of function and gp pointer into GOT. To make seal with such symbol
we add new method addIgnoredStrong(). It adds ignored symbol with global
binding to prevent the symbol substitution. The addIgnored call is not
enough here because this call adds a weak symbol which might be
substituted by symbol from shared library.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16084
llvm-svn: 257449
There are 3 symbol types that a .bc can provide during lto: defined,
undefined, common.
Defined and undefined symbols have already been refactored. I was
working on common and noticed that absolute symbols would become an
oddity: They would be the only symbol type present in a .o but not in
a.bc.
Looking a bit more, other than the special section number they were only
used for special rules for computing values. In that way they are
similar to TLS, and we don't have a DefinedTLS.
This patch deletes it. With it we have a reasonable rule of the thumb
for having a symbol kind: It exists if it has special resolution
semantics.
llvm-svn: 256383
I am working on adding LTO support to the new ELF lld.
In order to do that, it will be necessary to represent defined and
undefined symbols that are not from ELF files. One way to do it is to
change the symbol hierarchy to look like
Defined : SymbolBody
Undefined : SymbolBody
DefinedElf<ELFT> : Defined
UndefinedElf<ELFT> : Undefined
Another option would be to use bogus Elf_Sym, but I think that is
getting a bit too hackish.
This patch does the Undefined/UndefinedElf. Split. The next one
will do the Defined/DefinedElf split.
llvm-svn: 256289
The ELF spec says:
... if any reference to or definition of a name is a symbol with a
non-default visibility attribute, the visibility attribute must be
propagated to the resolving symbol in the linked object. If different
visibility attributes are specified for distinct references to or
definitions of a symbol, the most constraining visibility attribute
must be propagated to the resolving symbol in the linked object. The
attributes, ordered from least to most constraining, are:
STV_PROTECTED, STV_HIDDEN and STV_INTERNAL.
llvm-svn: 246603
Now that we print a symbol table and all symbol kinds are at least declared,
we can test all combinations that don't produce an error.
This also includes a few fixes to keep the test passing:
* Keep the strong symbol in a weak X strong pair
* Handle common symbols.
The common X common case will be finished in a followup patch.
llvm-svn: 246401
Rui Ueyama