Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ismail Pazarbasi e5768d1717 Detect uses of mismatching forms of 'new' and 'delete'
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.

rev 2 update:
`getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr` should return `dyn_cast_or_null`
instead of `dyn_cast`, since `E` might be null.

Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith

Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661

llvm-svn: 237608
2015-05-18 19:59:11 +00:00
Diego Novillo c324b92c35 Revert "Detect uses of mismatching forms of 'new' and 'delete'"
This reverts commit 742dc9b6c9686ab52860b7da39c3a126d8a97fbc.

This is generating multiple segfaults in our internal builds.
Test case coming up shortly.

llvm-svn: 237391
2015-05-14 20:57:48 +00:00
Ismail Pazarbasi 538ef53c13 Detect uses of mismatching forms of 'new' and 'delete'
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.

Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith

Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661

llvm-svn: 237368
2015-05-14 16:14:57 +00:00
Anton Yartsev 6ca45c92a9 [analyzer] Move the NewDeleteLeaks checker from CplusplusAlpha to Cplusplus package.
llvm-svn: 220289
2014-10-21 12:41:36 +00:00
Jordan Rose d02adbf03c [analyzer] Tests: move system functions into system header simulator files.
Some checkers ascribe different behavior to functions declared in system
headers, so when working with standard library functions it's probably best
to always have them in a standard location.

Test change only (no functionality change), but necessary for the next commit.

llvm-svn: 179552
2013-04-15 20:39:37 +00:00
Anna Zaks 93a21a8cfe [analyzer] Keep tracking the pointer after the escape to more aggressively report mismatched deallocator
Test that the path notes do not change. I don’t think we should print a note on escape.

Also, I’ve removed a check that assumed that the family stored in the RefStete could be
AF_None and added an assert in the constructor.

llvm-svn: 179075
2013-04-09 00:30:28 +00:00
Anna Zaks a1de8567fc [analyzer] Shorten the malloc checker’s leak message
As per Ted’s suggestion!

llvm-svn: 178938
2013-04-06 00:41:36 +00:00
Jordan Rose 10ad081fc6 [analyzer] Re-enable cplusplus.NewDelete (but not NewDeleteLeaks).
As mentioned in the previous commit message, the use-after-free and
double-free warnings for 'delete' are worth enabling even while the
leak warnings still have false positives.

llvm-svn: 178891
2013-04-05 17:55:07 +00:00
Jordan Rose 26330563f2 [analyzer] Split new/delete checker into use-after-free and leaks parts.
This splits the leak-checking part of alpha.cplusplus.NewDelete into a
separate user-level checker, alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks. All the
difficult false positives we've seen with the new/delete checker have been
spurious leak warnings; the use-after-free warnings and mismatched
deallocator warnings, while rare, have always been valid.

<rdar://problem/6194569>

llvm-svn: 178890
2013-04-05 17:55:00 +00:00
Anton Yartsev e3377fbca2 [analyzer] Reduced the unwanted correlations between checkers living inside MallocChecker.cpp
This fixes an issue pointed to by Jordan: if unix.Malloc and unix.MismatchedDeallocator are both on, then we end up still tracking leaks of memory allocated by new.
Moved the guards right before emitting the bug reports to unify and simplify the logic of handling of multiple checkers. Now all the checkers perform their checks regardless of if they were enabled, or not, and it is decided just before the emitting of the report, if it should be emitted. (idea from Anna).

Additional changes: 
improved test coverage for checker correlations;
refactoring: BadDealloc -> MismatchedDealloc

llvm-svn: 178814
2013-04-04 23:46:29 +00:00