This implements PPCTargetLowering::getTgtMemIntrinsic for Altivec load/store
intrinsics. As with the construction of the MachineMemOperands for the
intrinsic calls used for unaligned load/store lowering, the only slight
complication is that we need to represent a larger memory range than the
loaded/stored value-type size (because the address is rounded down to an
aligned address, and we need to conservatively represent the entire possible
range of the actual access). This required adding an extra size field to
TargetLowering::IntrinsicInfo, and this was done in a way that required no
modifications to other targets (the size defaults to the store size of the
provided memory data type).
This fixes test/CodeGen/PowerPC/unal-altivec-wint.ll (so it can be un-XFAILed).
llvm-svn: 215512
Unfortunately, our use of the SDNode class hierarchy for INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and
INTRINSIC_VOID nodes is somewhat broken right now. These nodes sometimes are
used for memory intrinsics (those with MachineMemOperands), and sometimes not.
When not, the nodes are not created as instances of MemIntrinsicSDNode, but
rather created as some other subclass of SDNode using DAG::getNode. When they
are memory intrinsics, they are created using DAG::getMemIntrinsicNode as
instances of MemIntrinsicSDNode. MemIntrinsicSDNode is a subclass of
MemSDNode, but prior to r214452, we had a non-self-consistent setup whereby
MemIntrinsicSDNode::classof on INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID would
return true but MemSDNode::classof on INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID
would return false. In r214452, MemSDNode::classof was changed to return true
for INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID, which is now self-consistent. The
problem is that neither the pre-r214452 logic and the post-r214452 logic are
really right. The truth is that not all INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID
nodes are instances of MemIntrinsicSDNode (or MemSDNode for that matter), and
the return value from classof needs to reflect that. This was broken before
r214452 (because MemIntrinsicSDNode::classof always returned true), and was
broken afterward (because MemSDNode::classof also always returned true), and
will now be correct.
The minimal solution is to grab one of the SubclassData bits (there is one left
for MemIntrinsicSDNode nodes) and use it to store whether or not a particular
INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN or INTRINSIC_VOID is really an instance of
MemIntrinsicSDNode or not. Doing this allows both MemIntrinsicSDNode::classof
and MemSDNode::classof to return the correct answer for the underlying object
for both the memory-intrinsic and non-memory-intrinsic cases.
This fixes the problem that r214452 created in the SelectionDAGDumper (thanks
to Matt Arsenault for pointing it out).
Because PowerPC does not implement getTgtMemIntrinsic, this change breaks
test/CodeGen/PowerPC/unal-altivec-wint.ll. I've XFAILed it for now, and will
fix it in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 215511
When generating unaligned vector loads, we need to search for other loads or
stores nearby offset by one vector width. If we find one, then we know that we
can safely generate another aligned load at that address. Otherwise, we must
generate the next load using an offset of the vector width minus one byte (so
we don't read off the end of the allocation if the base unaligned address
happened to be aligned at runtime). We had previously done this using only
other vector loads and stores, but did not consider the PowerPC-specific vector
load/store intrinsics. Now we'll also consider vector intrinsics. By itself,
this change is a feature enhancement, but is a necessary step toward fixing the
underlying problem behind PR19991.
llvm-svn: 214469
Hal Finkel