This commit removes the global manager variable which is responsible for
storing and allocating pseudo source values and instead it introduces a new
manager class named 'PseudoSourceValueManager'. Machine functions now own an
instance of the pseudo source value manager class.
This commit also modifies the 'get...' methods in the 'MachinePointerInfo'
class to construct pseudo source values using the instance of the pseudo
source value manager object from the machine function.
This commit updates calls to the 'get...' methods from the 'MachinePointerInfo'
class in a lot of different files because those calls now need to pass in a
reference to a machine function to those methods.
This change will make it easier to serialize pseudo source values as it will
enable me to transform the mips specific MipsCallEntry PseudoSourceValue
subclass into two target independent subclasses.
Reviewers: Akira Hatanaka
llvm-svn: 244693
canFoldMemoryOperand is not actually used anywhere in the codebase - all existing users instead call foldMemoryOperand directly when they wish to fold and can correctly deduce what they need from the return value.
This patch removes the canFoldMemoryOperand base function and the target implementations; only x86 had a real (bit-rotted) implementation, although AMDGPU had a preparatory stub that had never needed to be completed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11331
llvm-svn: 242638
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
This patch is quite boring overall, except for some uglyness in
ASMPrinter which has a getDataLayout function but has some clients
that use it without a Module (llmv-dsymutil, llvm-dwarfdump), so
some methods are taking a DataLayout as parameter.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11090
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 242386
This will use Itinieraries if available, but will also work if just a
MCSchedModel is available.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10428
llvm-svn: 239658
Summary:
This was a longstanding FIXME and is a necessary precursor to cases
where foldOperandImpl may have to create more than one instruction
(e.g. to constrain a register class). This is the split out NFC changes from
D6262.
Reviewers: pete, ributzka, uweigand, mcrosier
Reviewed By: mcrosier
Subscribers: mcrosier, ted, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10174
llvm-svn: 239336
This was previously returning int. However there are no negative opcode
numbers and more importantly this was needlessly different from
MCInstrDesc::getOpcode() (which even is the value returned here) and
SDValue::getOpcode()/SDNode::getOpcode().
llvm-svn: 237611
When commuting a thumb instruction in the size reduction pass, thumb
instructions are represented as a bundle and so some operands may be marked
as internal. The internal flag has to move with the operand when commuting.
This test is sensitive to register allocation so can't specifically check that
this error was happening, but so long as it continues to pass with -verify then
hopefully its still ok.
rdar://problem/20752113
llvm-svn: 236282
Revision 220239 exposed a latent bug in method
'TargetInstrInfo::commuteInstruction'. When commuting the operands of a machine
instruction, method 'commuteInstruction' didn't correctly propagate the
'IsUndef' flag to the register operands of the new (commuted) instruction.
Before this patch, the following instruction:
%vreg4<def> = VADDSDrr %vreg14, %vreg5<undef>; FR64:%vreg4,%vreg14,%vreg5
was wrongly converted by method 'commuteInstruction' into:
%vreg4<def> = VADDSDrr %vreg5, %vreg14<undef>; FR64:%vreg4,%vreg5,%vreg14
The correct instruction should have been:
%vreg4<def> = VADDSDrr %vreg5<undef>, %vreg14; FR64:%vreg4,%vreg5,%vreg14
This patch fixes the problem in method 'TargetInstrInfo::commuteInstruction'.
When swapping the operands of a machine instruction, we now make sure that
'IsUndef' flags are correctly set.
Added test case 'pr23103.ll'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9406
llvm-svn: 236258
derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the
DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global
data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget
changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have
had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The
R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and
this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME
to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass
the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to
avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
PEI tries to keep track of how much starting or ending a call sequence adjusts the stack pointer by, so that it can resolve frame-index references. Currently, it takes a very simplistic view of how SP adjustments are done - both FrameStartOpcode and FrameDestroyOpcode adjust it exactly by the amount written in its first argument.
This view is in fact incorrect for some targets (e.g. due to stack re-alignment, or because it may want to adjust the stack pointer in multiple steps). However, that doesn't cause breakage, because most targets (the only in-tree exception appears to be 32-bit ARM) rely on being able to simplify the call frame pseudo-instructions earlier, so this code is never hit.
Moving the computation into TargetInstrInfo allows targets to override the way the adjustment is computed if they need to have a non-zero SPAdj.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6863
llvm-svn: 225437
On MachO, and MachO only, we cannot have a truly empty function since that
breaks the linker logic for atomizing the section.
When we are emitting a frame pointer, the presence of an unreachable will
create a cfi instruction pointing past the last instruction. This is perfectly
fine. The FDE information encodes the pc range it applies to. If some tool
cannot handle this, we should explicitly say which bug we are working around
and only work around it when it is actually relevant (not for ELF for example).
Given the unreachable we could omit the .cfi_def_cfa_register, but then
again, we could also omit the entire function prologue if we wanted to.
llvm-svn: 217801
This removes static initializers from the backends which generate this data, and also makes this struct match the other Tablegen generated structs in behaviour
Reviewed by Andy Trick and Chandler C
llvm-svn: 216919
This patch adds a new property: isInsertSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getInsertSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getInsertSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) INSERT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216139
This patch adds a new property: isExtractSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getExtractSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getExtractSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) EXTRACT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216130
This patch adds a new property: isRegSequence and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getRegSequenceInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getRegSequenceLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) REG_SEQUENCE.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 215394
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
comment of the API.
Relaxes the behavior of TargetInstrInfo::commuteInstruction when
TargetInstrInfo::findCommutedOpIndices returns false.
Previously TargetInstrInfo triggered a fatal error in such situation whereas based
on the comment in the API it should just return nullptr. Indeed the only
precondition that should be ensured is that the instruction must be commutable.
llvm-svn: 208371
The old system was fairly convoluted:
* A temporary label was created.
* A single PROLOG_LABEL was created with it.
* A few MCCFIInstructions were created with the same label.
The semantics were that the cfi instructions were mapped to the PROLOG_LABEL
via the temporary label. The output position was that of the PROLOG_LABEL.
The temporary label itself was used only for doing the mapping.
The new CFI_INSTRUCTION has a 1:1 mapping to MCCFIInstructions and points to
one by holding an index into the CFI instructions of this function.
I did consider removing MMI.getFrameInstructions completelly and having
CFI_INSTRUCTION own a MCCFIInstruction, but MCCFIInstructions have non
trivial constructors and destructors and are somewhat big, so the this setup
is probably better.
The net result is that we don't create temporary labels that are never used.
llvm-svn: 203204
target independent.
Most of the x86 specific stackmap/patchpoint handling was necessitated by the
use of the native address-mode format for frame index operands. PEI has now
been modified to treat stackmap/patchpoint similarly to DEBUG_INFO, allowing
us to use a simple, platform independent register/offset pair for frame
indexes on stackmap/patchpoints.
Notes:
- Folding is now platform independent and automatically supported.
- Emiting patchpoints with direct memory references now just involves calling
the TargetLoweringBase::emitPatchPoint utility method from the target's
XXXTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter method. (See
X86TargetLowering for an example).
- No more ugly platform-specific operand parsers.
This patch shouldn't change the generated output for X86.
llvm-svn: 195944
Implementing this on bigendian platforms could get strange. I added a
target hook, getStackSlotRange, per Jakob's recommendation to make
this as explicit as possible.
llvm-svn: 194942
This comes into play with patchpoint, which can fold multiple
operands. Since the patchpoint is already treated as a call, the
machine mem operands won't affect anything, and there's nothing to
test. But we still want to do the right thing here to be sure that our
MIs obey the rules.
llvm-svn: 194750
For targets that have instruction itineraries this means no change. Targets
that move over to the new schedule model will use be able the new schedule
module for instruction latencies in the if-converter (the logic is such that if
there is no itineary we will use the new sched model for the latencies).
Before, we queried "TTI->getInstructionLatency()" for the instruction latency
and the extra prediction cost. Now, we query the TargetSchedule abstraction for
the instruction latency and TargetInstrInfo for the extra predictation cost. The
TargetSchedule abstraction will internally call "TTI->getInstructionLatency" if
an itinerary exists, otherwise it will use the new schedule model.
ATTENTION: Out of tree targets!
(I will also send out an email later to LLVMDev)
This means, if your target implements
unsigned getInstrLatency(const InstrItineraryData *ItinData,
const MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned *PredCost);
and returns a value for "PredCost", you now also need to implement
unsigned getPredictationCost(const MachineInstr *MI);
(if your target uses the IfConversion.cpp pass)
radar://15077010
llvm-svn: 191671
Replace the ill-defined MinLatency and ILPWindow properties with
with straightforward buffer sizes:
MCSchedMode::MicroOpBufferSize
MCProcResourceDesc::BufferSize
These can be used to more precisely model instruction execution if desired.
Disabled some misched tests temporarily. They'll be reenabled in a few commits.
llvm-svn: 184032
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
The Target library is not allowed to depend on the large CodeGen
library, but the TRI and TII classes provide abstract interfaces that
require both caller and callee to link to CodeGen.
The implementation files for these classes provide default
implementations of some of the hooks. These methods may need to
reference CodeGen, so they belong in that library.
We already have a number of methods implemented in the
TargetInstrInfoImpl sub-class because of that. I will merge that class
into the parent next.
llvm-svn: 168758
Richard Trieu