CXXCtorInitializers to the point where we perform the questionable lifetime
extension. This exposed a selection of false negatives in the warning.
llvm-svn: 183869
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.
This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.
This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.
llvm-svn: 169667
constructor/assignment operator with a const-qualified parameter type. The
prior method for determining this incorrectly used overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 168775
- In C++11, perform overload resolution over all assignment operators, rather than just looking for copy/move assignment operators.
- Clean up after temporaries produced by operator= immediately, rather than accumulating them until the end of the function.
llvm-svn: 167798
be defined as deleted, take cv-qualifiers on class members into account when
looking up the copy or move constructor or assignment operator which will be
used for them.
llvm-svn: 160418
constexpr until we get to the end of the class definition. When that happens,
be sure to remember that the class actually does have a constexpr constructor.
This is a stopgap solution, which still doesn't cover the case of a class with
multiple copy constructors (only some of which are constexpr). We should be
performing constructor lookup when implicitly defining a constructor in order
to determine whether all constructors it invokes are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 158228
Don't try to query whether an incomplete type has a trivial copy constructor
when determining whether a move constructor should be declared.
llvm-svn: 155575
non-const reference parameter type if the class had any subobjects with deleted
copy constructors. This causes a rejects-valid if the class's copy constructor
is explicitly defaulted (as happens for some implementations of std::pair etc).
llvm-svn: 155218
move constructor/move assignment operator are not declared, rather than being
defined as deleted, so move operations on the derived class fall back to
copying rather than moving.
If a move operation on the derived class is explicitly defaulted, the
unmovable subobject will be copied instead of being moved.
llvm-svn: 153883
function, provide a specialized diagnostic that indicates the kind of
special member function (default constructor, copy assignment
operator, etc.) and that it was implicitly deleted. Add a hook where
we can provide more detailed information later.
llvm-svn: 150611
when computing the exception specification of a copy or move constructor,
ignore non-static data member initializers. Fixes PR11418 /
<rdar://problem/10478642>.
llvm-svn: 145269
synthesized move assignment within an implicitly-defined move
assignment operator, be sure to treat the derived-to-base cast as an
xvalue (rather than an lvalue). Otherwise, we'll end up getting the
wrong constructor.
Optimize a direct call to a trivial move assignment operator to an
aggregate copy, as we do for trivial copy assignment operators, and
update the the assertion in CodeGenFunction::EmitAggregateCopy() to
cope with this optimization.
Fixes PR10860.
llvm-svn: 139143
semantic analysis when taking the address of an xvalue. Instead, just
build the unary operator directly, since it's safe to do so (from the
IRgen and AST perspectives) for any glvalue. Fixes PR10822.
llvm-svn: 138935
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
throw-expressions, such that we don't consider the NRVO when the
non-volatile automatic object comes from outside the innermost try
scope (C++0x [class.copymove]p13). In C++98/03, our ASTs were
incorrect but it didn't matter because IR generation doesn't actually
apply the NRVO here. In C++0x, however, we were moving from an object
when in fact we should have copied from it. Fixes PR10142 /
<rdar://problem/9714312>.
llvm-svn: 134548
when returning an NRVO candidate expression. For example, this
properly picks the move constructor when dealing with code such as
MoveOnlyType f() { MoveOnlyType mot; return mot; }
The previously-XFAIL'd rvalue-references test case now works, and has
been moved into the appropriate paragraph-specific test case.
llvm-svn: 123992
Richard Smith