With the goal of reusing that handler to do other things besides
handling assertions (such as terminating when an exception is thrown
under -fno-exceptions), the name `__libcpp_assertion_handler` doesn't
really make sense anymore.
Furthermore, I didn't want to use the name `__libcpp_abort_handler`,
since that would give the impression that the handler is called
whenever `std::abort()` is called, which is not the case at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130562
Summary:
The AIX linker does not merge typeinfos when shared libraries are involved, which causes address comparison to fail although the types are the same. This patch changes to use the non-unique implementation for typeinfo comparison for AIX.
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, philnik, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130715
Avoid relying on `iterator_traits` and instead deduce the return type of
dereferencing the iterator. Additionally, add a static check to reject
iterators with incorrect `iterator_traits` at compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130538
Since the calendar is added in C++20 the existing operators are removed.
Implements part of:
- P1614R2 The Mothership has Landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129887
After evaluating the new style I noticed inner namespaces are now
indented. I am not fond of that style and I've seen some other review
comment in this regard so I propose we remove this option and use the
LLVM default not to indent it.
Reviewed By: ldionne, philnik, var-const, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129441
Adds the papers and LWG issues voted in during the July 2022 plenary.
Note the updating of the project based statuses is left to the active
contributors of these projects.
Reviewed By: #libc, huixie90, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130595
- for all algorithms taking more than one range, add a `robust` test to
check the case where the ranges have different value types and the
given projections are different, with each projection applying to
a different value type;
- fix `ranges::include` to apply the correct projection to each range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130515
Instead of taking a fixed set of arguments, use variadics so that
we can pass arbitrary arguments to the handler. This is the first
step towards using the handler to handle other non-assertion-related
failures, like std::unreachable and an exception being thrown in
-fno-exceptions mode, which would improve user experience by including
additional information in crashes (right now, we call abort() without
additional information).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130507
This adds a C++20-version of `reverse_iterator` which doesn't SFINAE away the operators for use inside the classic STL algorithms. Pre-C++20 `_AlgRevIter` is just an alias for `reverse_iterator`.
Reviewed By: var-const, #libc
Spies: huixie90, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128864
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
mkstemp is guaranteed to make at least TMP_MAX attempts to create the
random file, and if it can't, it fails with EEXIST. get_temp_file_name
shouldn't call mkstemp again if it fails with anything other than
EEXIST. A single mkstemp call seems sufficient.
On Android, I've seen mkstemp fail with:
- EROFS (because cwd wasn't set to a writable filesystem)
- EACCES (because cwd pointed to a dir owned by root, but the test
program was running as the shell user instead)
Previously, get_temp_file_name would run forever in these situations.
See D4962 and "llvm-svn: 229035"
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130214
When -fexperimental-library is passed, libc++ will now pick up the
appropriate __has_feature flag defined by Clang to enable the
experimental library features.
As a fly-by, also update the documentation for the various TSes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130176
In D125283, we ensured that integer distributions would not compile when
used with arbitrary unsupported types. This effectively enforced what
the Standard mentions here: http://eel.is/c++draft/rand#req.genl-1.5.
However, this also had the effect of breaking some users that were
using integer distributions with unsupported types like int8_t. Since we
already support using __int128_t in those distributions, it is reasonable
to also support smaller types like int8_t and its unsigned variant. This
commit implements that, adds tests and documents the extension. Note that
we voluntarily don't add support for instantiating these distributions
with bool and char, since those are not integer types. However, it is
trivial to replace uses of these random distributions on char using int8_t.
It is also interesting to note that in the process of adding tests
for smaller types, I discovered that our distributions sometimes don't
provide as faithful a distribution when instantiated with smaller types,
so I had to relax a couple of tests. In particular, we do a really bad
job at implementing the negative binomial, geometric and poisson distributions
for small types. I think this all boils down to the algorithm we use in
std::poisson_distribution, however I am running out of time to investigate
that and changing the algorithm would be an ABI break (which might be
reasonable).
As part of this patch, I also added a mitigation for a very likely
integer overflow bug we were hitting in our tests in negative_binomial_distribution.
I also filed http://llvm.org/PR56656 to track fixing the problematic
distributions with int8_t and uint8_t.
Supersedes D125283.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126823
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
The return type was specified incorrectly for proxy iterators that
define `reference` to be a class that implicitly converts to
`value_type`. `__iter_move` would end up returning an object of type
`reference` which would then implicitly convert to `value_type`; thus,
the function will return a `value_type&&` rvalue reference to the local
temporary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130197
Michał Górny