This commit was already commited as revision rL208689 and discussd in
phabricator revision D3704.
But the test file was crashing on OS X and windows.
I fixed the test file in the same way as in rL208340.
llvm-svn: 208711
compared to 'AddrMode.BaseReg'. In the case that 'AddrMode.BaseReg' is
nullptr, 'Result' will also be nullptr, so the cast causes an assertion. We
should use dyn_cast_or_null here to check 'Result' is not null and it is an
instruction.
Bug found by Mats Petersson, and I reduced his IR to get a test case.
llvm-svn: 208705
Summary:
This required a new instruction group representing the 32-bit subset of
MIPS-3 that was available in MIPS32R2.
To limit the number of tests required, only one 32-bit and one 64-bit ISA
prior to MIPS32/MIPS64 are tested.
rdhwr has been deliberately left without an ISA annotation for now. This is
because the assembler and CodeGen disagree on when the instruction is
available. Strictly speaking, it is only available in MIPS32r2 and
MIPS64r2. However, it is emulated by a kernel trap on earlier ISA's and is
necessary for TLS so CodeGen should emit it on older ISA's too.
Depends on D3696
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3697
llvm-svn: 208690
Normally, patterns like (add x, (setcc cc ...)) will be folded into
(csel x, x+1, not cc). However, if there is a ZEXT after SETCC, they
won't be folded. This patch recognizes the ZEXT and allows the
generation of CSINC.
This patch fixes bug 19680.
llvm-svn: 208660
Right now the load may not get DCE'd because of the side-effect of updating
the base pointer.
This can happen if we lower a read-modify-write of an illegal larger type
(e.g. i48) such that the modification only affects one of the subparts (the
lower i32 part but not the higher i16 part). See the testcase.
In order to spot the dead load we need to revisit it when SimplifyDemandedBits
decided that the value of the load is masked off. This is the
CommitTargetLoweringOpt piece.
I checked compile time with ARM64 by sending SPEC bitcode files through llc.
No measurable change.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16031651>
llvm-svn: 208640
r208453 added support for having sret on the second parameter. In that
change, the code for copying sret into a virtual register was hoisted
into the loop that lowers formal parameters. This caused a "Wrong
topological sorting" assertion failure during scheduling when a
parameter is passed in memory. This change undoes that by creating a
second loop that deals with sret.
I'm worried that this fix is incomplete. I don't fully understand the
dependence issues. However, with this change we produce the same DAGs
we used to produce, so if they are broken, they are just as broken as
they have always been.
llvm-svn: 208637
For some impending improvements to debug info, LLVM will start assuming
that when the CU specifies llvm::DIBuilder::LineTablesOnly, the IR for
functions described by that CU will not include variables, types, etc.
(might be worth having some test coverage for GMLT + non-GMLT CUs,
especially with non-GMLT functions inlined into GMLT CU functions)
llvm-svn: 208634
Tested by comparing make check VERBOSE=1 before and after to make sure
no tests are missed. (VERBOSE=1 prints the list of tests.)
Only one test :( remains where .cpp is required:
tools/llvm-cov/range_based_for.cpp:// RUN: llvm-cov range_based_for.cpp | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STDOUT
The topic was discussed in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140428/214905.html
llvm-svn: 208621
The current patterns for REV16 misses mostn __builtin_bswap16() due to
legalization promoting the operands to from load/stores toi32s and then
truncing/extending them. This patch adds new patterns that catch the resultant
DAGs and codegens them to rev16 instructions. Tests included.
rdar://15353652
llvm-svn: 208620
One test case had to be updated as it still had the extra indirection
for the variable list - removing the extra indirection got it back to
passing.
llvm-svn: 208608
Summary:
Also use named constants for common opcode fields.
Depends on D3669
Reviewers: jkolek, vmedic, zoran.jovanovic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3670
llvm-svn: 208582
Summary: The 'mul' line of the test is temporarily commented out because it currently matches the MIPS32 mul instead of the MIPS32r6 mul. This line will be uncommented when we disable the MIPS32 mul on MIPS32r6.
Reviewers: jkolek, zoran.jovanovic, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3668
llvm-svn: 208576
Summary:
To limit the number of tests required, only one 32-bit and one 64-bit ISA
prior to MIPS32/MIPS64 are explicitly tested.
Depends on D3695
Reviewers: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3696
llvm-svn: 208549
Summary:
This required a new instruction group representing the 32-bit subset of
MIPS-V that was available in MIPS32R2
Most of these instructions are correctly rejected but with the wrong error
message. These have been placed in a separate test for now. It happens
because many of the MIPS V instructions have not been implemented.
Depends on D3694
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3695
llvm-svn: 208546
Summary:
DCL[ZO] are now correctly marked as being MIPS64 instructions. This has no
effect on the CodeGen tests since expansion of i64 prevented their use
anyway.
The check for MIPS16 to prevent the use of CLZ no longer prevents DCLZ as
well. This is not a functional change since DCLZ is still prohibited by
being a MIPS64 instruction (MIPS16 is only compatible with MIPS32).
No functional change
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3694
llvm-svn: 208544
Summary:
dsbh and dshd are not available on Mips32r2. No codegen test changes
required since expansion of i64 prevented the use of these instructions
anyway.
Depends on D3690
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3692
llvm-svn: 208542
In transformation:
BinOp(shuffle(v1,undef), shuffle(v2,undef)) -> shuffle(BinOp(v1, v2),undef)
type of the undef argument must be same as type of BinOp.
llvm-svn: 208531
1) Changed gather and scatter intrinsics. Now they are aligned with GCC built-ins. There is no more non-masked form. Masked intrinsic receives -1 if all lanes are executed.
2) I changed the function that works with intrinsics inside X86ISelLowering.cpp. I put all intrinsics in one table. I did it for INTRINSICS_W_CHAIN and plan to put all intrinsics from WO_CHAIN set to the same table in order to avoid the long-long "switch". (I wanted to use static map initialization that allowed by C++11 but I wasn't able to compile it on VS2012).
3) I added gather/scatter prefetch intrinsics.
4) I fixed MRMm encoding for masked instructions.
llvm-svn: 208522
Do not apply transformation:
BinOp(shuffle(v1), shuffle(v2)) -> shuffle(BinOp(v1, v2))
if operands v1 and v2 are of different size.
This change fixes PR19717, which was caused by r208488.
llvm-svn: 208518
Support for the intrinsics that read from and write to global named registers
is added for r1, r2 and r13 (depending on the subtarget).
llvm-svn: 208509
This test was using the inliner and other optimizations to test a case
that's actually a bug anyway. Bug and possible fix/discussion described
here ( http://reviews.llvm.org/D3714 ).
But the functionality that was implemented along with this test is still
desired, so simplify the test to verify a more obvious/less wrong case
that the functionality addressed: looking through const sugar to the
underlying type when emitting a constant (so the constant is emitted as
signed/unsigned as appropriate depending on the signedness of the
underlying type).
llvm-svn: 208504
The counter-loops formation pass needs to know what operations might be
function calls (because they can't appear in counter-based loops). On PPC32,
128-bit shifts might be runtime calls (even though you can't use __int128 on
PPC32, it seems that SROA might form them).
Fixes PR19709.
llvm-svn: 208501
Christian Pirker