inlined functions. For example, given
template<typename T>
class string {
unsigned Len;
public:
unsigned size() const { return Len; }
};
extern template class string<char>;
we now give the instantiation of string<char>::size
available_externally linkage (if it is ever instantiated!), as
permitted by the C++0x standard.
llvm-svn: 85340
members that have a definition. Also, use
CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl as part of this instantiation
to make sure that we diagnose the various kinds of problems that can
occur with explicit instantiations.
llvm-svn: 85270
template instantiation. Preserve it through PCH. Show it off to the indexer.
I'm healthily ignoring the vector type cases because we don't have a sensible
TypeLoc implementation for them anyway.
llvm-svn: 84994
in the DeclaratorInfo, if one is present.
Preserve source information through template instantiation. This is made
more complicated by the possibility that ParmVarDecls don't have DIs, which
is possibly worth fixing in the future.
Also preserve source information for function parameters in ObjC method
declarations.
llvm-svn: 84971
TypeLoc class names to be $(Type classname)Loc. Rewrite the visitor.
Provide skeleton implementations for all the new TypeLocs.
Handle all cases in PCH. Handle a few more cases when inserting
location information in SemaType.
It should be extremely straightforward to add new location information
to existing TypeLoc objects now.
llvm-svn: 84386
instantiation redeclaration semantics for function template
specializations and member functions of class template
specializations. Also, record the point of instantiation for
explicit-instantiated functions and static data members.
llvm-svn: 84188
template as a specialization. For example, this occurs with:
template<typename T>
struct X {
template<typename U> struct Inner { /* ... */ };
};
template<> template<typename T>
struct X<int>::Inner {
T member;
};
We need to treat templates that are member specializations as special
in two contexts:
- When looking for a definition of a member template, we look
through the instantiation chain until we hit the primary template
*or a member specialization*. This allows us to distinguish
between the primary "Inner" definition and the X<int>::Inner
definition, above.
- When computing all of the levels of template arguments needed to
instantiate a member template, don't add template arguments
from contexts outside of the instantiation of a member
specialization, since the user has already manually substituted
those arguments.
Fix up the existing test for p18, which was actually wrong (but we
didn't diagnose it because of our poor handling of member
specializations of templates), and add a new test for member
specializations of templates.
llvm-svn: 83974
track of the kind of specialization or instantiation. Also, check the
scope of the specialization and ensure that a specialization
declaration without an initializer is not a definition.
llvm-svn: 83533
function of a class template was implicitly instantiated, explicitly
instantiated (declaration or definition), or explicitly
specialized. The same MemberSpecializationInfo structure will be used
for static data members and member classes as well.
llvm-svn: 83509
first implementation recognizes when a function declaration is an
explicit function template specialization (based on the presence of a
template<> header), performs template argument deduction + ambiguity
resolution to determine which template is being specialized, and hooks
There are many caveats here:
- We completely and totally drop any explicitly-specified template
arguments on the floor
- We don't diagnose any of the extra semantic things that we should
diagnose.
- I haven't looked to see that we're getting the right linkage for
explicit specializations
On a happy note, this silences a bunch of errors that show up in
libstdc++'s <iostream>, although Clang still can't get through the
entire header.
llvm-svn: 82728
Several of the existing methods were identical to their respective
specializations, and so have been removed entirely. Several more 'leaf'
optimizations were introduced.
The getAsFoo() methods which imposed extra conditions, like
getAsObjCInterfacePointerType(), have been left in place.
llvm-svn: 82501
generated for an inline function definition, taking into account C99
and GNU inline/extern inline semantics. This solution is simpler,
cleaner, and fixes PR4536.
llvm-svn: 81670
instantiation of a member function template or member function of a
class template to be out-of-line if the definition of that function
template or member function was defined out-of-line. This ensures that
we get the correct linkage for explicit instantiations of out-of-line
definitions.
llvm-svn: 81562
- Diagnose attempts to add default arguments to templates (or member
functions of templates) after the initial declaration (DR217).
- Improve diagnostics when a default argument is redefined. Now, the
note will always point at the place where the default argument was
previously defined, rather than pointing to the most recent
declaration of the function.
llvm-svn: 81548
templates. We now distinguish between an explicit instantiation
declaration and an explicit instantiation definition, and know not to
instantiate explicit instantiation declarations. Unfortunately, there
is some remaining confusion w.r.t. instantiation of out-of-line member
function definitions that causes trouble here.
llvm-svn: 81053
DeclaratorDecl contains a DeclaratorInfo* to keep type source info.
Subclasses of DeclaratorDecl are FieldDecl, FunctionDecl, and VarDecl.
EnumConstantDecl still inherits from ValueDecl since it has no need for DeclaratorInfo.
Decl/Sema interfaces accept a DeclaratorInfo as parameter but no DeclaratorInfo is created yet.
llvm-svn: 79392
DeclaratorInfo will contain a flat memory block for source information about a type that came out of a declarator.
TypeLoc and its subclasses will be used by clients as wrappers to "traverse" the memory block and read the information.
Both DeclaratorInfo and TypeLoc are not utilized in this commit.
llvm-svn: 79391
1) Allow the Index library (and any other interested client) to walk
the set of declarations for a given tag (enum, union, class,
whatever). At the moment, this information is not readily available.
2) Reduce our dependence on TagDecl::TypeForDecl being mapped down
to a TagType (for which getDecl() will return the tag definition, if
one exists). This property won't exist for class template partial
specializations.
3) Make the canonical declaration of a TagDecl actually canonical,
e.g., so that it does not change when the tag is defined.
llvm-svn: 77523
Type::getAsReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<ReferenceType>()
Type::getAsRecordType() -> Type::getAs<RecordType>()
Type::getAsPointerType() -> Type::getAs<PointerType>()
Type::getAsBlockPointerType() -> Type::getAs<BlockPointerType>()
Type::getAsLValueReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<LValueReferenceType>()
Type::getAsRValueReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<RValueReferenceType>()
Type::getAsMemberPointerType() -> Type::getAs<MemberPointerType>()
Type::getAsReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<ReferenceType>()
Type::getAsTagType() -> Type::getAs<TagType>()
And remove Type::getAsReferenceType(), etc.
This change is similar to one I made a couple weeks ago, but that was partly
reverted pending some additional design discussion. With Doug's pending smart
pointer changes for Types, it seemed natural to take this approach.
llvm-svn: 77510
Note that this also fixes a bug that affects non-template code, where we
were not treating out-of-line static data members are "file-scope" variables,
and therefore not checking their initializers.
llvm-svn: 77002
until Doug Gregor's Type smart pointer code lands (or more discussion occurs).
These methods just call the new Type::getAs<XXX> methods, so we still have
reduced implementation redundancy. Having explicit getAsXXXType() methods makes
it easier to set breakpoints in the debugger.
llvm-svn: 76193
Note: One day, it might be useful to consider adding this info to DeclGroup (as the comments in FunctionDecl/VarDecl suggest). For now, I think this works fine. I considered moving this to ValueDecl (a common ancestor of FunctionDecl/VarDecl/FieldDecl), however this would add overhead to EnumConstantDecl (which would burn memory and isn't necessary).
llvm-svn: 75635
It iterates over all the redeclarations, regardless of the starting point. For example:
1) int f();
2) int f();
3) int f();
if you have the (2) FunctionDecl and call redecls_begin/redecls_end to iterate, you'll get this sequence:
(2)
(1)
(3)
The motivation to introduce this was that, previously, if (3) was a function definition,
and you called getBody() at (2), it would not return it, since getBody() iterated over the previous declarations only,
so it would only check (2) and (1).
llvm-svn: 75604
Douglas Gregor