Commit Graph

257 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amjad Aboud f1f57a3137 Another try to commit 323321 (aggressive instruction combine).
llvm-svn: 323416
2018-01-25 12:06:32 +00:00
Amjad Aboud d53504e379 Reverted 323321.
llvm-svn: 323326
2018-01-24 14:48:49 +00:00
Amjad Aboud e4453233d7 [InstCombine] Introducing Aggressive Instruction Combine pass (-aggressive-instcombine).
Combine expression patterns to form expressions with fewer, simple instructions.
This pass does not modify the CFG.

For example, this pass reduce width of expressions post-dominated by TruncInst
into smaller width when applicable.

It differs from instcombine pass in that it contains pattern optimization that
requires higher complexity than the O(1), thus, it should run fewer times than
instcombine pass.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38313

llvm-svn: 323321
2018-01-24 12:42:42 +00:00
Malcolm Parsons 21e545d08d Fix typos of occurred and occurrence
llvm-svn: 323318
2018-01-24 10:33:39 +00:00
David Blaikie 0c64f5a2eb NewPM: Add an extension point for the start of the pipeline.
This applies to most pipelines except the LTO and ThinLTO backend
actions - it is for use at the beginning of the overall pipeline.

This extension point will be used to add the GCOV pass when enabled in
Clang.

llvm-svn: 323166
2018-01-23 01:25:20 +00:00
Easwaran Raman bdf20261d8 Add a pass to generate synthetic function entry counts.
Summary:
This pass synthesizes function entry counts by traversing the callgraph
and using the relative block frequencies of the callsites. The intended
use of these counts is in inlining to determine hot/cold callsites in
the absence of profile information.

The pass is split into two files with the code that propagates the
counts in a callgraph in a Utils file. I plan to add support for
propagation in the thinlto link phase and the propagation code will be
shared and hence this split. I did not add support to the old PM since
hot callsite determination in inlining is not possible in old PM
(although we could use hot callee heuristic with synthetic counts in the
old PM it is not worth the effort tuning it)

Reviewers: davidxl, silvas

Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41604

llvm-svn: 322110
2018-01-09 19:39:35 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 02e7f0247b [PM] pass -debug-pass-manager flag into FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor's canonicalization PM
Summary:
New pass manager driver passes DebugPM (-debug-pass-manager) flag into
individual PassManager constructors in order to enable debug logging.
FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor has its own internal LoopCanonicalizationPM
which never gets its debug logging enabled and that means canonicalization
passes like LoopSimplify are never present in -debug-pass-manager output.

Extending FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor's constructor and
createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor wrapper with an optional
boolean DebugLogging argument.

Passing debug-logging flags there as appropriate.

Reviewers: chandlerc, davide

Reviewed By: davide

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41586

llvm-svn: 321548
2017-12-29 08:16:06 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 26d11ca4b0 (Re-landing) Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function
Re-land r321234.  It had to be reverted because it broke the shared
library build.  The shared library build broke because there was a
missing LLVMBuild dependency from lib/Passes (which calls
TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis) to lib/Target.  As far as I can
tell, this problem was always there but was somehow masked
before (perhaps because TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis was a
virtual function).

Original commit message:

This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler.  We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.

See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html

I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.

Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464

llvm-svn: 321375
2017-12-22 18:21:59 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 4b86d79048 [PM] port Rewrite Statepoints For GC to the new pass manager.
Summary:
The port is nearly straightforward.
The only complication is related to the analyses handling,
since one of the analyses used in this module pass is domtree,
which is a function analysis. That requires asking for the results
of each function and disallows a single interface for run-on-module
pass action.

Decided to copy-paste the main body of this pass.
Most of its code is requesting analyses anyway, so not that much
of a copy-paste.

The rest of the code movement is to transform all the implementation
helper functions like stripNonValidData into non-member statics.

Extended all the related LLVM tests with new-pass-manager use.
No failures.

Reviewers: sanjoy, anna, reames

Reviewed By: anna

Subscribers: skatkov, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41162

llvm-svn: 320796
2017-12-15 09:32:11 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 0ab0c1a201 [SimplifyCFG] don't sink common insts too soon (PR34603)
This should solve:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34603
...by preventing SimplifyCFG from altering redundant instructions before early-cse has a chance to run.
It changes the default (canonical-forming) behavior of SimplifyCFG, so we're only doing the
sinking transform later in the optimization pipeline.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38566

llvm-svn: 320749
2017-12-14 22:05:20 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin d8920b1c44 Remove redundant includes from various places.
llvm-svn: 320629
2017-12-13 21:31:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth c34f789e38 Add a new pass to speculate around PHI nodes with constant (integer) operands when profitable.
The core idea is to (re-)introduce some redundancies where their cost is
hidden by the cost of materializing immediates for constant operands of
PHI nodes. When the cost of the redundancies is covered by this,
avoiding materializing the immediate has numerous benefits:
1) Less register pressure
2) Potential for further folding / combining
3) Potential for more efficient instructions due to immediate operand

As a motivating example, consider the remarkably different cost on x86
of a SHL instruction with an immediate operand versus a register
operand.

This pattern turns up surprisingly frequently, but is somewhat rarely
obvious as a significant performance problem.

The pass is entirely target independent, but it does rely on the target
cost model in TTI to decide when to speculate things around the PHI
node. I've included x86-focused tests, but any target that sets up its
immediate cost model should benefit from this pass.

There is probably more that can be done in this space, but the pass
as-is is enough to get some important performance on our internal
benchmarks, and should be generally performance neutral, but help with
more extensive benchmarking is always welcome.

One awkward part is that this pass has to be scheduled after
*everything* that can eliminate these kinds of redundancies. This
includes SimplifyCFG, GVN, etc. I'm open to suggestions about better
places to put this. We could in theory make it part of the codegen pass
pipeline, but there doesn't really seem to be a good reason for that --
it isn't "lowering" in any sense and only relies on pretty standard cost
model based TTI queries, so it seems to fit well with the "optimization"
pipeline model. Still, further thoughts on the pipeline position are
welcome.

I've also only implemented this in the new pass manager. If folks are
very interested, I can try to add it to the old PM as well, but I didn't
really see much point (my use case is already switched over to the new
PM).

I've tested this pretty heavily without issue. A wide range of
benchmarks internally show no change outside the noise, and I don't see
any significant changes in SPEC either. However, the size class
computation in tcmalloc is substantially improved by this, which turns
into a 2% to 4% win on the hottest path through tcmalloc for us, so
there are definitely important cases where this is going to make
a substantial difference.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37467

llvm-svn: 319164
2017-11-28 11:32:31 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 3e29890a7f [(new) Pass Manager] instantiate SimplifyCFG with the same options as the old PM
This is a recommit of r316869 which was speculatively reverted with r317444 and 
subsequently shown to not be the cause of PR35210. That crash should be fixed
after r318237.

Original commit message:

The old PM sets the options of what used to be known as "latesimplifycfg" on the
instantiation after the vectorizers have run, so that's what we'redoing here.

FWIW, there's a later SimplifyCFGPass instantiation in both PMs where we do not
set the "late" options. I'm not sure if that's intentional or not.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39407

llvm-svn: 318299
2017-11-15 16:33:11 +00:00
Hans Wennborg e1ecd61b98 Rename CountingFunctionInserter and use for both mcount and cygprofile calls, before and after inlining
Clang implements the -finstrument-functions flag inherited from GCC, which
inserts calls to __cyg_profile_func_{enter,exit} on function entry and exit.

This is useful for getting a trace of how the functions in a program are
executed. Normally, the calls remain even if a function is inlined into another
function, but it is useful to be able to turn this off for users who are
interested in a lower-level trace, i.e. one that reflects what functions are
called post-inlining. (We use this to generate link order files for Chromium.)

LLVM already has a pass for inserting similar instrumentation calls to
mcount(), which it does after inlining. This patch renames and extends that
pass to handle calls both to mcount and the cygprofile functions, before and/or
after inlining as controlled by function attributes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39287

llvm-svn: 318195
2017-11-14 21:09:45 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 00a301d568 [PM] Port BoundsChecking to the new PM.
Registers it and everything, updates all the references, etc.

Next patch will add support to Clang's `-fexperimental-new-pass-manager`
path to actually enable BoundsChecking correctly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39084

llvm-svn: 318128
2017-11-14 01:30:04 +00:00
David L. Jones 82b22e0327 [PassManager, SimplifyCFG] Revert r316908 and r316869.
These cause Clang to crash with a segfault. See PR35210 for details.

llvm-svn: 317444
2017-11-06 00:32:01 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim 0c99007db1 Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.

Original commit message:

    Summary:
    This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
    more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
    so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
    threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
    As of now we support two cases :

    1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
    are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
    constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
    call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.

    Split from :
          if (!ptr || c)
            callee(ptr);
    to :
          if (!ptr)
            callee(null ptr)  // set the known constant value
          else if (c)
            callee(nonnull ptr)  // set non-null attribute in the argument

    2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
    For example,
    from :
          BB0:
           %c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
           br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
          BB1:
           br label %BB2
          BB2:
           %p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
           call void @bar(i32 %p)
    to
          BB0:
           %c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
           br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
          BB1:
           br label %BB2-split1
          BB2-split0:
           call void @bar(i32 0)
           br label %BB2
          BB2-split1:
           call void @bar(i32 1)
           br label %BB2
          BB2:
           %p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]

llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-03 20:41:16 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim 0eb1c2d63a Revert "Add CallSiteSplitting pass"
Revert due to Buildbot failure.

This reverts commit r317351.

llvm-svn: 317353
2017-11-03 19:17:11 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim 2a58933519 Add CallSiteSplitting pass
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :

1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.

Split from :
      if (!ptr || c)
        callee(ptr);
to :
      if (!ptr)
        callee(null ptr)  // set the known constant value
      else if (c)
        callee(nonnull ptr)  // set non-null attribute in the argument

2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
      BB0:
       %c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
       br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
      BB1:
       br label %BB2
      BB2:
       %p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
       call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
      BB0:
       %c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
       br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
      BB1:
       br label %BB2-split1
      BB2-split0:
       call void @bar(i32 0)
       br label %BB2
      BB2-split1:
       call void @bar(i32 1)
       br label %BB2
      BB2:
       %p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]

Reviewers: davidxl, huntergr, chandlerc, mcrosier, eraman, davide

Reviewed By: davidxl

Subscribers: sdesmalen, ashutosh.nema, fhahn, mssimpso, aemerson, mgorny, mehdi_amini, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39137

llvm-svn: 317351
2017-11-03 19:01:57 +00:00
Sanjay Patel adf38911d8 [(new) Pass Manager] instantiate SimplifyCFG with the same options as the old PM
The old PM sets the options of what used to be known as "latesimplifycfg" on the 
instantiation after the vectorizers have run, so that's what we'redoing here.

FWIW, there's a later SimplifyCFGPass instantiation in both PMs where we do not 
set the "late" options. I'm not sure if that's intentional or not.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39407

llvm-svn: 316869
2017-10-29 20:49:31 +00:00
Matthew Simpson cb58558c2f Add CalledValuePropagation pass
This patch adds a new pass for attaching !callees metadata to indirect call
sites. The pass propagates values to call sites by performing an IPSCCP-like
analysis using the generic sparse propagation solver. For indirect call sites
having a small set of possible callees, the attached metadata indicates what
those callees are. The metadata can be used to facilitate optimizations like
intersecting the function attributes of the possible callees, refining the call
graph, performing indirect call promotion, etc.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37355

llvm-svn: 316576
2017-10-25 13:40:08 +00:00
Rong Xu e1f4245f8d [PM] Add pgo-memop-opt pass to the new pass manager
This pass adds pgo-memop-opt pass to the new pass manager.
It is in the old pass manager but somehow left out in the new pass manager.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D39145

llvm-svn: 316384
2017-10-23 22:21:29 +00:00
Adam Nemet 0965da2055 Rename OptimizationDiagnosticInfo.* to OptimizationRemarkEmitter.*
Sync it up with the name of the class actually defined here.  This has been
bothering me for a while...

llvm-svn: 315249
2017-10-09 23:19:02 +00:00
Davide Italiano e070721308 [NewPassManager] Run global dead code elimination after the inliner.
This is the same exact change we did for the current pass manager
in rL314997, but the new pass manager pipeline already happened
to run GlobalOpt after the inliner, so we just insert a run of
GDCE here.

llvm-svn: 315003
2017-10-05 18:36:01 +00:00
Dehao Chen d26dae0d34 Separate the logic when handling indirect calls in SamplePGO ThinLTO compile phase and other phases.
Summary: In SamplePGO ThinLTO compile phase, we will not invoke ICP as it may introduce confusion to the 2nd annotation. This patch extracted that logic and makes it clearer before profile annotation. In the mean time, we need to make function importing process both inlined callsites as well as not promoted indirect callsites.

Reviewers: tejohnson

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38094

llvm-svn: 314619
2017-10-01 05:24:51 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 6fd4391ddd [DivRempairs] add a pass to optimize div/rem pairs (PR31028)
This is intended to be a superset of the functionality from D31037 (EarlyCSE) but implemented 
as an independent pass, so there's no stretching of scope and feature creep for an existing pass. 
I also proposed a weaker version of this for SimplifyCFG in D30910. And I initially had almost 
this same functionality as an addition to CGP in the motivating example of PR31028:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31028

The advantage of positioning this ahead of SimplifyCFG in the pass pipeline is that it can allow 
more flattening. But it needs to be after passes (InstCombine) that could sink a div/rem and
undo the hoisting that is done here.

Decomposing remainder may allow removing some code from the backend (PPC and possibly others).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37121 

llvm-svn: 312862
2017-09-09 13:38:18 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 19913b22c0 [PM] Switch the CGSCC debug messages to use the standard LLVM debug
printing techniques with a DEBUG_TYPE controlling them.

It was a mistake to start re-purposing the pass manager `DebugLogging`
variable for generic debug printing -- those logs are intended to be
very minimal and primarily used for testing. More detailed and
comprehensive logging doesn't make sense there (it would only make for
brittle tests).

Moreover, we kept forgetting to propagate the `DebugLogging` variable to
various places making it also ineffective and/or unavailable. Switching
to `DEBUG_TYPE` makes this a non-issue.

llvm-svn: 310695
2017-08-11 05:47:13 +00:00
Dehao Chen 2f4e2e2758 Revert part of r310296 to make it really NFC for instrumentation PGO.
Summary: Part of r310296 will disable PGOIndirectCallPromotion in ThinLTO backend if PGOOpt is None. However, as PGOOpt is not passed down to ThinLTO backend for instrumentation based PGO, that change would actually disable ICP entirely in ThinLTO backend, making it behave differently in instrumentation PGO mode. This change reverts that change, and only disable ICP there when it is SamplePGO.

Reviewers: davidxl

Reviewed By: davidxl

Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36566

llvm-svn: 310550
2017-08-10 05:10:32 +00:00
Dehao Chen 08f8831e57 Move the SampleProfileLoader right after EarlyFPM.
Summary: SampleProfileLoader pass do need to happen after some early cleanup passes so that inlining can happen correctly inside the SampleProfileLoader pass.

Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl, tejohnson

Reviewed By: chandlerc, tejohnson

Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36333

llvm-svn: 310296
2017-08-07 20:23:20 +00:00
Teresa Johnson ecd901314d [PM] Split LoopUnrollPass and make partial unroller a function pass
Summary:
This is largely NFC*, in preparation for utilizing ProfileSummaryInfo
and BranchFrequencyInfo analyses. In this patch I am only doing the
splitting for the New PM, but I can do the same for the legacy PM as
a follow-on if this looks good.

*Not NFC since for partial unrolling we lose the updates done to the
loop traversal (adding new sibling and child loops) - according to
Chandler this is not very useful for partial unrolling, but it also
means that the debugging flag -unroll-revisit-child-loops no longer
works for partial unrolling.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36157

llvm-svn: 309886
2017-08-02 20:35:29 +00:00
Dehao Chen 89d3226019 Update the new PM pipeline to make ICP aware if it is SamplePGO build.
Summary: In ThinLTO backend compile, OPTOptions are not set so that the ICP in ThinLTO backend does not know if it is a SamplePGO build, in which profile count needs to be annotated directly on call instructions. This patch cleaned up the PGOOptions handling logic and passes down PGOOptions to ThinLTO backend.

Reviewers: chandlerc, tejohnson, davidxl

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36052

llvm-svn: 309780
2017-08-02 01:28:31 +00:00
Dehao Chen 95f003003d Refactor the build{Module|Function}SimplificationPipeline to expose optimization phase.
Summary: This is in preparation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D36052

Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl, tejohnson

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36053

llvm-svn: 309500
2017-07-30 04:55:39 +00:00
Dehao Chen ce0842ce9c Refine the PGOOpt and SamplePGOSupport handling.
Summary:
Now that SamplePGOSupport is part of PGOOpt, there are several places that need tweaking:
1. AddDiscriminator pass should *not* be invoked at ThinLTOBackend (as it's already invoked in the PreLink phase)
2. addPGOInstrPasses should only be invoked when either ProfileGenFile or ProfileUseFile is non-empty.
3. SampleProfileLoaderPass should only be invoked when SampleProfileFile is non-empty.
4. PGOIndirectCallPromotion should only be invoked in ProfileUse phase, or in ThinLTOBackend of SamplePGO.

Reviewers: chandlerc, tejohnson, davidxl

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36040

llvm-svn: 309478
2017-07-29 04:10:24 +00:00
Dehao Chen 641f387cd0 Update the assertion to meet with the changes in r309121. (NFC)
llvm-svn: 309125
2017-07-26 15:47:00 +00:00
Dehao Chen e90d0153ca Make new PM honor -fdebug-info-for-profiling
Summary: The new PM needs to invoke add-discriminator pass when building with -fdebug-info-for-profiling.

Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35744

llvm-svn: 309121
2017-07-26 15:01:20 +00:00
Philip Pfaffe 730f2f9bb6 [PM] Enable registration of out-of-tree passes with PassBuilder
Summary:
This patch adds a callback registration API to the PassBuilder,
enabling registering out-of-tree passes with it.

Through the Callback API, callers may register callbacks with the
various stages at which passes are added into pass managers, including
parsing of a pass pipeline as well as at extension points within the
default -O pipelines.

Registering utilities like `require<>` and `invalidate<>` needs to be
handled manually by the caller, but a helper is provided.

Additionally, adding passes at pipeline extension points is exposed
through the opt tool. This patch adds a `-passes-ep-X` commandline
option for every extension point X, which opt parses into pipelines
inserted into that extension point.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: lksbhm, grosser, davide, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33464

llvm-svn: 307532
2017-07-10 10:57:55 +00:00
Dehao Chen 3a9861420c Add sample PGO support to ThinLTO new pass manager.
Summary:
For SamplePGO + ThinLTO, because profile annotation is done twice at both PrepareForThinLTO pipeline and backend compiler, the following changes are needed at the PrepareForThinLTO phase to ensure the IR is not changed dramatically. Otherwise the profile annotation will be inaccurate in the backend compiler.

* disable hot-caller heuristic
* disable loop unrolling
* disable indirect call promotion

This will unblock the new PM testing for sample PGO (tools/clang/test/CodeGen/pgo-sample-thinlto-summary.c), which will be covered in another cfe patch.

Reviewers: chandlerc, tejohnson, davidxl

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34895

llvm-svn: 307437
2017-07-07 20:53:10 +00:00
Dehao Chen 2f31d0d86e Hook the sample PGO machinery in the new PM
Summary: This patch hooks up SampleProfileLoaderPass with the new PM.

Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl, davide, tejohnson

Reviewed By: chandlerc, tejohnson

Subscribers: tejohnson, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34720

llvm-svn: 306763
2017-06-29 23:33:05 +00:00
Tim Shen 664706916b [ThinkLTO] Invoke build(Thin)?LTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline.
Previously it doesn't actually invoke the designated new PM builder
functions.

This patch moves NameAnonGlobalPass out from PassBuilder, as Chandler
points out that PassBuilder is used for non-O0 builds, and for
optimizations only.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34728

llvm-svn: 306756
2017-06-29 23:08:38 +00:00
Easwaran Raman 8249fac52d Create inliner params based on size and opt levels.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34309

llvm-svn: 306542
2017-06-28 13:33:49 +00:00
Geoff Berry 2573a19fe6 [EarlyCSE][MemorySSA] Enable MemorySSA in function-simplification pass of EarlyCSE.
llvm-svn: 306477
2017-06-27 22:25:02 +00:00
Xinliang David Li b67530e9b9 [PGO] Implementate profile counter regiser promotion
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D34085

llvm-svn: 306231
2017-06-25 00:26:43 +00:00
Eric Christopher 5a7c2f1700 Remove the LoadCombine pass. It was never enabled and is unsupported.
Based on discussions with the author on mailing lists.

llvm-svn: 306067
2017-06-22 22:58:12 +00:00
Geoff Berry 3cca1da20c [EarlyCSE] Add option to use MemorySSA for function simplification run of EarlyCSE (off by default).
Summary:
Use MemorySSA for memory dependency checking in the EarlyCSE pass at the
start of the function simplification portion of the pipeline.  We rely
on the fact that GVNHoist runs just after this pass of EarlyCSE to
amortize the MemorySSA construction cost since GVNHoist uses MemorySSA
and EarlyCSE preserves it.

This is turned off by default.  A follow-up change will turn it on to
allow for easier reversion in case it breaks something.

llvm-svn: 305146
2017-06-10 15:20:03 +00:00
Davide Italiano be1b6a963e [PM] Add GVNSink to the pipeline.
With this, the two pipelines should be in sync again (modulo
LoopUnswitch, but Chandler is actively working on that).

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D33810

llvm-svn: 304671
2017-06-03 23:18:29 +00:00
Davide Italiano c368831580 Move GVNHoist to the right position in the new pass manager pipeline.
GVNHoist was moved as part of simplification passes for the current
pass manager (but not for the new), so they're out-of-sync.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D33806

llvm-svn: 304490
2017-06-01 23:08:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 8b3be4e59d [PM/ThinLTO] Port the ThinLTO pipeline (both components) to the new PM.
Based on the original patch by Davide, but I've adjusted the API exposed
to just be different entry points rather than exposing more state
parameters. I've factored all the common logic out so that we don't have
any duplicate pipelines, we just stitch them together in different ways.
I think this makes the build easier to reason about and understand.

This adds a direct method for getting the module simplification pipeline
as well as a method to get the optimization pipeline. While not my
express goal, this seems nice and gives a good place comment about the
restrictions that are imposed on them.

I did make some minor changes to the way the pipelines are structured
here, but hopefully not ones that are significant or controversial:

1) I sunk the PGO indirect call promotion to only be run when we have
   PGO enabled (or as part of the special ThinLTO pipeline).

2) I made the extra GlobalOpt run in ThinLTO just happen all the time
   and at a slightly more powerful place (before we remove available
   externaly functions). This seems like general goodness and not a big
   compile time sink, so it didn't make sense to *only* use it in
   ThinLTO. Fewer differences in the pipeline makes everything simpler
   IMO.

3) I hoisted the ThinLTO stop point pre-link above the the RPO function
   attr inference. The RPO inference won't infer anything terribly
   meaningful pre-link (recursiveness?) so it didn't make a lot of
   sense. But if the placement of RPO inference starts to matter, we
   should move it to the canonicalization phase anyways which seems like
   a better place for it (and there is a FIXME to this effect!). But
   that seemed a bridge too far for this patch.

If we ever need to parameterize these pipelines more heavily, we can
always sink the logic to helper functions with parameters to keep those
parameters out of the public API. But the changes above seemed minor
that we could possible get away without the parameters entirely.

I added support for parsing 'thinlto' and 'thinlto-pre-link' names in
pass pipelines to make it easy to test these routines and play with them
in larger pipelines. I also added a really basic manifest of passes test
that will show exactly how the pipelines behave and work as well as
making updates to them clear.

Lastly, this factoring does introduce a nesting layer of module pass
managers in the default pipeline. I don't think this is a big deal and
the flexibility of decoupling the pipelines seems easily worth it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33540

llvm-svn: 304407
2017-06-01 11:39:39 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 86248d5632 [PM] Enable the new simple loop unswitch pass in the new pass manager
(where it is the only realistic option).

This passes the LLVM test suite for me, but I'm clearly still hammering
on this.

llvm-svn: 303952
2017-05-26 01:24:11 +00:00
Chandler Carruth f4d62c480c [PM] Teach the PGO instrumentation pasess to run GlobalDCE before
instrumenting code.

This is important in the new pass manager. The old pass manager's
inliner has a small DCE routine embedded within it. The new pass manager
relies on the actual GlobalDCE pass for this.

Without this patch, instrumentation profiling with the new PM results in
massive code bloat in the object files because the instrumentation
itself ends up preventing DCE from working to remove the code.

We should probably change the instrumentation (and/or DCE) so that we
can eliminate dead code even if instrumented, but we shouldn't even
spend the time generating instrumentation for that code so this still
seems like a good patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33535

llvm-svn: 303845
2017-05-25 07:15:09 +00:00
Davide Italiano 8e7d11ab2b [NewPM] Fix an innocent but silly typo. Reported by Craig Topper.
llvm-svn: 303587
2017-05-22 23:47:11 +00:00