diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
uninitialized. This seems not to be the case in C++0x, where we still
call the (trivial) default constructor for a POD class
(!). Previously, we had implemented only the C++0x rules; now we
implement both. Fixes PR6536.
llvm-svn: 97928
a fixme and PR6451.
Only perform jump checking if the containing function has no errors,
and add the infrastructure needed to do this.
On the testcase in the PR, we produce:
t.cc:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto later;
^
t.cc:7:5: note: jump bypasses variable initialization
X x;
^
llvm-svn: 97497
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Richard Trieu