In particular, make breaking after a parameter's ":" more of a last
resort choice as it significantly affects the readability gained by
aligning the parameters.
Before (in Chromium style - which doesn't allow bin-packing):
{
popup_window_.reset([[RenderWidgetPopupWindow alloc]
initWithContentRect:
NSMakeRect(
origin_global.x, origin_global.y, pos.width(), pos.height())
styleMask:NSBorderlessWindowMask
backing:NSBackingStoreBuffered
defer:NO]);
}
After:
{
popup_window_.reset([[RenderWidgetPopupWindow alloc]
initWithContentRect:NSMakeRect(origin_global.x,
origin_global.y,
pos.width(),
pos.height())
styleMask:NSBorderlessWindowMask
backing:NSBackingStoreBuffered
defer:NO]);
}
llvm-svn: 195301
Summary:
The AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine option now controls short function
body placement on a single line independent of the BreakBeforeBraces option.
Updated tests using BreakBeforeBraces other than BS_Attach.
Addresses http://llvm.org/PR17888
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2230
llvm-svn: 195256
Before, existing code in the form of:
int a; // this is a.
// This is
// b.
int b;
Got turned into:
int a; // this is a.
// This is
// b.
int b;
llvm-svn: 194294
Before:
unsigned ContentSize =
sizeof(int16_t) // DWARF ARange version number
+
sizeof(int32_t) // Offset of CU in the .debug_info section
+
sizeof(int8_t) // Pointer Size (in bytes)
+
sizeof(int8_t); // Segment Size (in bytes)
After:
unsigned ContentSize =
sizeof(int16_t) // DWARF ARange version number
+ sizeof(int32_t) // Offset of CU in the .debug_info section
+ sizeof(int8_t) // Pointer Size (in bytes)
+ sizeof(int8_t); // Segment Size (in bytes)
This fixes llvm.org/PR17687.
llvm-svn: 194276
As a side-effect, constructors definitions will correctly be recognized
and formatted as function declarations. Tests will be added in a
follow-up patch actually using the correct recognition.
llvm-svn: 194209
Before, clang-format would always format entire nested blocks, which
can be unwanted e.g. for long DEBUG({...}) statements. Also
clang-format would not allow to merge lines in nested blocks (e.g. to
put "if (a) return;" on one line in Google style).
This is the first step of several refactorings mostly focussing on the
additional functionality (by reusing the "format many lines" code to
format the children of a nested block). The next steps are:
* Pull out the line merging into its own class.
* Seperate the formatting of many lines from the formatting of a single
line (and the analysis of the solution space).
llvm-svn: 194090
Same as SpacesInParentheses, this option allows adding a space inside
the '<' and '>' of a template parameter list.
Patch by Christopher Olsen.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17301.
llvm-svn: 193614
Specifically make clang-format less eager to break after the opening
parenthesis of a function call.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa + aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
Apparently that is preferable. This penalties are adapted
conservatively, we might have to increase them a little bit further.
llvm-svn: 193410
This fixes llvm.org/PR17682.
Without this patch, the following code leads to invalid reads/writes:
DEBUG({
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
});
#if a
#else
#endif
Because of the #if-#else structure, the code is formatted and annotated
twice and becauce of the nested block, the annotated lines form a
hierarchical structure. This structure was not properly reset between
runs.
llvm-svn: 193352
Specifically, if a braced list has at least one nested braced list,
format it either all on one line or in one column (i.e. one item per
line).
This seems in general to be an improvement as the structure of nested
braced lists can make a tightly packed outer braced list hard to read.
llvm-svn: 193345
If we run into the second preprocessor branch chain, the first branch
chain might have already set the maximum branch count on that level to
something > 0.
Fixes PR17645.
llvm-svn: 193153
Now that we iterate on the formatting multiple times when we
have chains of preprocessor branches, we need to correctly reset
the token's previous and next pointer for the first / last token.
llvm-svn: 193071
Before:
DEBUG({ // Comment that used to confuse clang-format.
fdafas();
});
Before:
DEBUG({ // Comments are now fine.
fdafas();
});
This fixed llvm.org/PR17619.
llvm-svn: 193051
Before (note the missing space before "..." which can lead to compile
errors):
switch (x) {
case 'A'... 'Z':
case 1... 5:
break;
}
After:
switch (x) {
case 'A' ... 'Z':
case 1 ... 5:
break;
}
llvm-svn: 193050
Before, clang-format would not adjust leading indents if it found a
structural error (e.g. unmatched {}). It seems, however, that
clang-format has gotten good enough at parsing the code structure that
this hurts in almost all cases. Commonly, while writing code, it is
very useful to be able to correclty indent incomplete if statements or
for loops.
In case this leads to errors that we don't anticipate, we need to find
out and fix those.
This fixed llvm.org/PR17594.
llvm-svn: 192988
This looks ugly and leads to llvm.org/PR17590.
Before (with AlwaysBreakBeforeMultilineStrings):
return
"aaaa"
"bbbb";
After:
return "aaaa"
"bbbb";
llvm-svn: 192984
Specifically, prefer breaking before trailing annotations over breaking
before the first parameter.
Before:
void ffffffffffffffffffffffff(
int aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
int aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) OVERRIDE;
After:
void ffffffffffffffffffffffff(int aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
int aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
OVERRIDE;
llvm-svn: 192983
Summary:
Store IndentationLevel in ParentState and use it instead of the
Line::Level when indening.
Also fixed incorrect indentation level calculation in formatFirstToken.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1797
llvm-svn: 192563
While it is mostly a user error to have the extra semicolon,
formatting it graciously will correctly format in the cases
where we do not fully understand the code (macros).
llvm-svn: 192543
Summary:
This way we avoid breaking code which uses unknown preprocessor
directives with long string literals. The specific use case in
http://llvm.org/PR17035 isn't very common, but it seems to be a good idea to
avoid this kind of problem anyway.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1813
llvm-svn: 192507
In certain macros or incorrect string literals, the token stream can
contain 'unknown' tokens, e.g. a single backslash or a set of empty
ticks. clang-format simply treated them as whitespace and removed them
prior to this patch.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17215
llvm-svn: 192490
Before, clang-format would always insert a linebreak before the comment
in code like:
template <typename T> // T can be A, B or C.
struct S {};
llvm-svn: 192297
Specifically make ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine work
nicely with BreakConstructorInitializersBeforeComma.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17395.
llvm-svn: 192168
Previously, comments, could totally confuse it.
Before:
return
// true if code is one of a or b.
code == a ||
code == b;
After:
return
// true if code is one of a or b.
code == a || code == b;
llvm-svn: 191654
Summary:
Changed UseTab to be a enum with three options: Never, Always,
ForIndentation (true/false are still supported when reading .clang-format).
IndentLevel should currently be propagated correctly for all tokens, except for
block comments. Please take a look at the general idea before I start dealing
with block comments.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1770
llvm-svn: 191527
Summary:
The width of the first inserted tab character depends on the initial
column, so we need to handle the first tab in a special manner.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1763
llvm-svn: 191497
Before:
template <typename T>
// T should be one of {A, B}.
void f() {}
After:
template <typename T>
// T should be one of {A, B}.
void f() {}
llvm-svn: 191492
Before (with column limit 60):
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >
> aaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >> aaaaa);
(Not sure how that could have stayed in that long without being
detected..)
llvm-svn: 190854
Before:
template <template <typename>
class Fooooooo, template <typename>
class Baaaaaaar>
struct C {};
After:
template <template <typename> class Fooooooo,
template <typename> class Baaaaaaar>
struct C {};
llvm-svn: 190747
Summary:
reformat() tries to determine the newline style used in the input
(either LF or CR LF), and uses it for the output. Maybe not every single case is
supported, but at least the bug described in http://llvm.org/PR17182 should be
resolved.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1643
llvm-svn: 190519
Summary: This also unifies the handling of escaped newlines for all tokens.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1638
llvm-svn: 190405
Summary:
This fixes various issues with mixed tabs and spaces handling, e.g.
when realigning block comments.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1608
llvm-svn: 190395
Let clang-format consistently keep up to one empty line (configured via
FormatStyle::MaxEmptyLinesToKeep) in nested blocks, e.g. lambdas. Also,
actually format single statements in nested blocks.
Before:
DEBUG({ int i; });
DEBUG({
int i;
// an empty line here would just be removed.
int j;
});
After:
DEBUG({ int i; });
DEBUG({
int i;
int j;
});
llvm-svn: 190278
Before:
FirstToken->WhitespaceRange.getBegin()
.getLocWithOffset(First->LastNewlineOffset);
After:
FirstToken->WhitespaceRange.getBegin().getLocWithOffset(
First->LastNewlineOffset);
Re-add logic to prevent breaking after an empty set of parentheses.
Basically it seems that calling a function without parameters is more
like navigating along the same object than it is a separate step of a
builder-type call.
We might need to extends this in future to allow "short" parameters that
e.g. are an index accessing a specific element.
llvm-svn: 190126
This fixes two issues:
1) The indent of a line comment was not adapted to the subsequent
statement as it would be outside of a nested block.
2) A missing DryRun flag caused actualy breaks to be inserted in
overly long comments while trying to come up with the best line
breaking decisions.
llvm-svn: 190123
Summary:
Count column width instead of the number of code points. This also
includes correct handling of tabs inside string literals and comments (with an
exception of multiline string literals/comments, where tabs are present before
the first escaped newline).
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1601
llvm-svn: 190052
This patch makes sure we produce the right number of unwrapped lines,
a follow-up patch will make the whitespace formatting consistent.
Before:
void f() {
int i = {[operation setCompletionBlock : ^{ [self onOperationDone];
}]
}
;
}
After:
void f() {
int i = {[operation setCompletionBlock : ^{
[self onOperationDone];
}] };
}
llvm-svn: 189932
Implements parsing of lambdas in the UnwrappedLineParser.
This introduces the correct line breaks; the formatting of
lambda captures are still incorrect, and the braces are also
still formatted as if they were braced init lists instead of
blocks.
llvm-svn: 189818
Almost by accident, clang-format seems to be able to format protocol
buffer definitions (https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/).
The only change is that a space is required between numeric constants
and opening square brackets (for default values). While this might in
theory be used for array subscripts (int val = 4[MyArray]), I have not
seen this pattern in practice much. If this is wrong, we can make this
smarter in the future.
llvm-svn: 189663
Daniel Jasper