Previously, many error messages would simply be "read-only variable is not
assignable" This change provides more information about why the variable is
not assignable, as well as note to where the const is located.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4479
llvm-svn: 234677
A [*] is only allowed in a declaration for a function, not in its
definition. We didn't correctly recurse while looking for it, causing
us to crash in CodeGen instead of rejecting it.
This fixes PR23151.
llvm-svn: 234363
The argument range checks for the HTM and Crypto builtins were implemented in
CGBuiltin.cpp, not in Sema. This change moves them to the appropriate location
in SemaChecking.cpp. It requires the creation of a new method in the Sema class
to do checks for PPC-specific builtins.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8672
llvm-svn: 233586
On android x86_32 the long double is only 64 bits (compared to 80 bits
on linux x86_32) and on android x86_64 the long double is IEEEquad
(compared to x87DoubleExtended on linux x86_64). This CL creates new
TargetInfo classes for this targets to represent these differences.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8357
llvm-svn: 233177
This warns when using decls that are not available on all deployment targets.
For example, a call to
- (void)ppartialMethod __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.8)));
will warn if -mmacosx-version-min is set to less than 10.8.
To silence the warning, one has to explicitly redeclare the method like so:
@interface Whatever(MountainLionAPI)
- (void)ppartialMethod;
@end
This way, one cannot accidentally call a function that isn't available
everywhere. Having to add the redeclaration will hopefully remind the user
to add an explicit respondsToSelector: call as well.
Some projects build against old SDKs to get this effect, but building against
old SDKs suppresses some bug fixes -- see http://crbug.com/463171 for examples.
The hope is that SDK headers are annotated well enough with availability
attributes that new SDK + this warning offers the same amount of protection
as using an old SDK.
llvm-svn: 232750
Sema overrides ASTContext's policy on the first emitted diagnostic
(doesn't matter if it's ignored or not). This means changing the order
of diagnostic emission in Sema suddenly changes the text of diagnostic
emitted from the parser.
In the test case -Wmissing-prototypes (ignored) was the culprit, use
'int main' to suppress that warning so we see when this regresses.
Also move it into Sema/ as it's not testing any C++.
llvm-svn: 232039
Since continue, break, return are much more common than __finally, this tries
to keep the work for continue, break, return O(1). Sema keeps a stack of active
__finally scopes (to do this, ActOnSEHFinally() is split into
ActOnStartSEHFinally() and ActOnFinishSEHFinally()), and the various jump
statements then check if the current __finally scope (if present) is deeper
than then destination scope of the jump.
The same warning for goto statements is still missing.
This is the moral equivalent of MSVC's C4532.
llvm-svn: 231623
This adds the -fapplication-extension option, along with the
ios_app_extension and macosx_app_extension availability attributes.
Patch by Ted Kremenek
llvm-svn: 230989
MSVC doesn't warn on this. Users are expected to apply the WINAPI macro
to functions passed by pointer to the Win32 API, and this macro expands
to __stdcall. This means we end up with a lot of useless noisy warnings
about ignored calling conventions when compiling code with clang for
Win64.
llvm-svn: 230668
This adds a new __freebsd_kprintf__ format string type, which enables
checking when used in __attribute__((format(...))) attributes. It can
check the FreeBSD kernel specific %b, %D, %r and %y specifiers, using
existing diagnostic messages. Also adds test cases for all these
specifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7154
llvm-svn: 229921
Also removed unused builtins.
Original patch by Andrea Di Biagio!
Reviewers: craig.topper, nadav
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7199
llvm-svn: 228481
Previously we would simply double-emit the body of the __finally block,
but that doesn't work when it contains any kind of Decl, which we can't
double emit.
This fixes that by emitting the block once and branching into a shared
code region and then branching back out.
llvm-svn: 228222
When visiting AssignmentOps, keep evaluating after a failure (when possible) in
order to identify overflow in subexpressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D1238
llvm-svn: 228202
__declspec(restrict) and __attribute(malloc) are both handled
identically by clang: they are allowed to the noalias LLVM attribute.
Seeing as how noalias models the C99 notion of 'restrict', rename the
internal clang attribute to Restrict from Malloc.
llvm-svn: 228120
Previously, when the following piece of code was compiled, clang would
incorrectly warn that the size of "wide_two" does not match register size
specified by the constraint and modifier":
long wide_two = two;
asm ("%w0 %1" : "+r" (one), "+r"(wide_two));
This was caused by a miscalculation of ConstraintIdx in Sema::ActOnGCCAsmStmt.
This commit fixes PR21270 and rdar://problem/18668354.
llvm-svn: 228089
Clang asserts for this pointer reference in asms of naked functions.
This patch diagnoses if this pointer reference is used.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7329
llvm-svn: 228052
Summary:
It was used for interoperability with PNaCl's calling conventions, but
it's no longer needed.
Also Remove NaCl*ABIInfo which just existed to delegate to either the portable
or native ABIInfo, and remove checkCallingConvention which was now a no-op
override.
Reviewers: jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7206
llvm-svn: 227362
In particular, remove the OpaqueExpr transformation from r225389 and
move the correction of the conditional from CheckConditionalOperands to
ActOnConditionalOp before the OpaqueExpr is created. This fixes the
typo correction behavior in C code that uses the GNU extension for a
binary ?: (without an expression between the "?" and the ":").
llvm-svn: 227220
The lowering looks a lot like normal EH lowering, with the exception
that the exceptions are caught by executing filter expression code
instead of matching typeinfo globals. The filter expressions are
outlined into functions which are used in landingpad clauses where
typeinfo would normally go.
Major aspects that still need work:
- Non-call exceptions in __try bodies won't work yet. The plan is to
outline the __try block in the frontend to keep things simple.
- Filter expressions cannot use local variables until capturing is
implemented.
- __finally blocks will not run after exceptions. Fixing this requires
work in the LLVM SEH preparation pass.
The IR lowering looks like this:
// C code:
bool safe_div(int n, int d, int *r) {
__try {
*r = normal_div(n, d);
} __except(_exception_code() == EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
; LLVM IR:
define i32 @filter(i8* %e, i8* %fp) {
%ehptrs = bitcast i8* %e to i32**
%ehrec = load i32** %ehptrs
%code = load i32* %ehrec
%matches = icmp eq i32 %code, i32 u0xC0000094
%matches.i32 = zext i1 %matches to i32
ret i32 %matches.i32
}
define i1 zeroext @safe_div(i32 %n, i32 %d, i32* %r) {
%rr = invoke i32 @normal_div(i32 %n, i32 %d)
to label %normal unwind to label %lpad
normal:
store i32 %rr, i32* %r
ret i1 1
lpad:
%ehvals = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__C_specific_handler
catch i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*)
%ehptr = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 0
%sel = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 1
%filter_sel = call i32 @llvm.eh.seh.typeid.for(i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*))
%matches = icmp eq i32 %sel, %filter_sel
br i1 %matches, label %eh.except, label %eh.resume
eh.except:
ret i1 false
eh.resume:
resume
}
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5607
llvm-svn: 226760
We didn't consider any alignment attributes on an EnumDecl when
calculating alignment.
While we are here, ignore alignment specifications on typedef types if
one is used as the underlying type. Otherwise, weird things happen:
enum Y : int;
Y y;
typedef int __attribute__((aligned(64))) u;
enum Y : u {};
What is the alignment of 'Y'? It would be more consistent with the
overall design of enums with fixed underlying types to consider the
underlying type's UnqualifiedDesugaredType.
This fixes PR22279.
llvm-svn: 226653
Things that are OK:
extern int var1 __attribute((alias("v1")));
static int var2 __attribute((alias("v2")));
Things that are not OK:
int var3 __attribute((alias("v3")));
extern int var4 __attribute((alias("v4"))) = 4;
We choose to accpet:
struct S { static int var5 __attribute((alias("v5"))); };
This code causes assertion failues in GCC 4.8 and ICC 13.0.1, we have
no reason to reject it.
This partially fixes PR22217.
llvm-svn: 226436
We would check the type information from the declaration found by lookup
but we would neglect checking compatibility with the most recent
declaration. This would make it possible for us to not correctly
diagnose inconsistencies with declarations which were made in a
different scope.
llvm-svn: 225934
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
This is a different approach to r225780.
llvm-svn: 225875
Dmitri Gribenko