Commit Graph

122 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher 6e11073b3e Unify warnings/errors from "maybe you meant" to "did you mean".
llvm-svn: 233981
2015-04-02 22:10:06 +00:00
David Blaikie a953f2825b Update Clang tests to handle explicitly typed load changes in LLVM.
llvm-svn: 230795
2015-02-27 21:19:58 +00:00
David Blaikie 8b7766e15c Remove trailing whitespace to make test compatible with typeless pointer migration
llvm-svn: 229272
2015-02-15 04:12:19 +00:00
Larisse Voufo 19d0867284 Implement the remaining portion of DR1467 from r227022. I may have overlooked a few things, but this implementation comes straight from the DR resolution itself.
llvm-svn: 227224
2015-01-27 18:47:05 +00:00
Nico Weber b3a9978dc8 Don't let virtual calls and dynamic casts call Sema::MarkVTableUsed().
clang currently calls MarkVTableUsed() for classes that get their virtual
methods called or that participate in a dynamic_cast. This is unnecessary,
since CodeGen only emits vtables when it generates constructor, destructor, and
vtt code. (*)

Note that Sema::MarkVTableUsed() doesn't cause the emission of a vtable.
Its main user-visible effect is that it instantiates virtual member functions
of template classes, to make sure that if codegen decides to write a vtable
all the entries in the vtable are defined.

While this shouldn't change the behavior of codegen (other than being faster),
it does make clang more permissive: virtual methods of templates (in particular
destructors) end up being instantiated less often. In particular, classes that
have members that are smart pointers to incomplete types will now get their
implicit virtual destructor instantiated less frequently. For example, this
used to not compile but does now compile:

    template <typename T> struct OwnPtr {
      ~OwnPtr() { static_assert((sizeof(T) > 0), "TypeMustBeComplete"); }
    };
    class ScriptLoader;
    struct Base { virtual ~Base(); };
    struct Sub : public Base {
      virtual void someFun() const {}
      OwnPtr<ScriptLoader> m_loader;
    };
    void f(Sub *s) { s->someFun(); }

The more permissive behavior matches both gcc (where this is not often
observable, since in practice most things with virtual methods have a key
function, and Sema::DefineUsedVTables() skips vtables for classes with key
functions) and cl (which is my motivation for this change) – this fixes
PR20337.  See this issue and the review thread for some discussions about
optimizations.

This is similar to r213109 in spirit. r225761 was a prerequisite for this
change.

Various tests relied on "a->f()" marking a's vtable as used (in the sema
sense), switch these to just construct a on the stack. This forces
instantiation of the implicit constructor, which will mark the vtable as used.

(*) The exception is -fapple-kext mode: In this mode, qualified calls to
virtual functions (`a->Base::f()`) still go through the vtable, and since the
vtable pointer off this doesn't point to Base's vtable, this needs to reference
Base's vtable directly. To keep this working, keep referencing the vtable for
virtual calls in apple kext mode.

llvm-svn: 227073
2015-01-26 06:23:36 +00:00
Rafael Espindola e5df59ff78 Emit DeferredDeclsToEmit in a DFS order.
Currently we emit DeferredDeclsToEmit in reverse order. This patch changes that.

The advantages of the change are that

* The output order is a bit closer to the source order. The change to
test/CodeGenCXX/pod-member-memcpys.cpp is a good example.

* If we decide to deffer more, it will not cause as large changes in the
estcases as it would without this patch.

llvm-svn: 226751
2015-01-22 00:24:57 +00:00
Nathan Sidwell 44b21749b9 PR6037
Warn on inaccessible direct base

llvm-svn: 226423
2015-01-19 01:44:02 +00:00
Ismail Pazarbasi 025f428c73 Replace "can not" with "cannot" in diagnostics messages.
llvm-svn: 203302
2014-03-07 22:36:23 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 3d79154aec [Win32 ABI] Defer operator delete checks until vtable is marked used
We were previously checking at every destructor declaration, but that was a bit
excessive. Since the deleting destructor is emitted with the vtable, do the
check when the vtable is marked used.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2851

llvm-svn: 202046
2014-02-24 15:58:24 +00:00
Richard Smith 566184ac75 When a special member is explicitly defaulted outside its class, and we reject
the defaulting because it would delete the member, produce additional notes
explaining why the member is implicitly deleted.

llvm-svn: 199829
2014-01-22 20:09:10 +00:00
Richard Smith e81daee21b When formatting a C++-only declaration name, enable C++ mode in the formatter's
language options. This is not really ideal -- we should require the right
language options to be passed in, or not require language options to format a
name -- but it fixes a number of *obviously* wrong formattings. Patch by
Olivier Goffart!

llvm-svn: 199778
2014-01-22 00:27:42 +00:00
Hans Wennborg c9bd88e681 Remove the -cxx-abi command-line flag.
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.

To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545

llvm-svn: 199250
2014-01-14 19:35:09 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 9125b08b52 Update tests in preparation for using the MS ABI for Win32 targets
In preparation for making the Win32 triple imply MS ABI mode,
make all tests pass in this mode, or make them use the Itanium
mode explicitly.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2401

llvm-svn: 199130
2014-01-13 19:48:13 +00:00
Ted Kremenek b79ee57080 Implemented delayed processing of 'unavailable' checking, just like with 'deprecated'.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.

This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings.  By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent.  It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.

This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated".  It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
 (e.g., "function" instead of "destructor").  By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away.  This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.

llvm-svn: 197627
2013-12-18 23:30:06 +00:00
Alp Toker 6ed7251683 Revert "Don't require -re suffix on -verify directives with regexes."
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.

(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)

This reverts commit r197295.

llvm-svn: 197299
2013-12-14 01:07:05 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 9b395ef284 Don't require -re suffix on -verify directives with regexes.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2392

llvm-svn: 197295
2013-12-14 00:46:53 +00:00
Hans Wennborg cda4b6dd00 Change semantics of regex expectations in the diagnostic verifier
Previously, a line like

  // expected-error-re {{foo}}

treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".

This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.

(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388

llvm-svn: 197092
2013-12-11 23:40:50 +00:00
Richard Smith ab44d5badf Implement DR1460: fix handling of default initializers in unions; don't allow
more than one such initializer in a union, make mem-initializers override
default initializers for other union members, handle anonymous unions with
anonymous struct members better. Fix a couple of semi-related bugs exposed by
the tests for same.

llvm-svn: 196892
2013-12-10 08:25:00 +00:00
Richard Smith 41c35d6d2f Unify lookup from within not-yet-defined defaulted special members: use common
code for handling triviality, deletedness and constexpr. Fix a few bugs in
these, particularly related to mutable members, and remove some dead code.

llvm-svn: 195809
2013-11-27 03:39:20 +00:00
Richard Smith c91d12ce80 Take cv-qualifiers on fields of class type into account when determining
whether a defaulted special member function should be deleted.

llvm-svn: 195620
2013-11-25 07:07:05 +00:00
Richard Smith b2504bdc0d Issue a diagnostic if an implicitly-defined move assignment operator would move
the same virtual base class multiple times (and the move assignment is used,
and the move assignment for the virtual base is not trivial).

llvm-svn: 193977
2013-11-04 04:26:14 +00:00
Richard Smith 8b86f2d401 Implement final resolution of DR1402: implicitly-declared move operators that
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.

Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).

llvm-svn: 193969
2013-11-04 01:48:18 +00:00
Richard Smith 114394f824 Implement [class.friend]p11's special name lookup rules for friend declarations
of local classes. We were previously handling this by performing qualified
lookup within a function declaration(!!); replace it with the proper scope
lookup.

llvm-svn: 188050
2013-08-09 04:35:01 +00:00
Eli Friedman 7a2eca0f0f Fix crash-on-invalid with inheriting constructor.
Fixes PR16656.

llvm-svn: 186631
2013-07-18 23:59:50 +00:00
Eli Friedman ebea0f29e2 Clean up diagnostics for inheriting constructors.
No new diagnostics, just better wording and notes pointing at more
relevant locations.

llvm-svn: 186629
2013-07-18 23:29:14 +00:00
Richard Smith e3b28bc363 Move detection of reference members binding to temporaries from building of
CXXCtorInitializers to the point where we perform the questionable lifetime
extension. This exposed a selection of false negatives in the warning.

llvm-svn: 183869
2013-06-12 21:51:50 +00:00
Richard Smith 3c626edda2 PR15755: don't drop parameter packs when dropping parameters with default
arguments in the formation of a candidate set of inheriting constructors.

llvm-svn: 179708
2013-04-17 19:00:52 +00:00
Richard Smith 185be185b2 C++11 inheriting constructors: support for inheriting constructor templates.
llvm-svn: 179151
2013-04-10 05:48:59 +00:00
Richard Smith b4d2a15d17 If a defaulted special member is implicitly deleted, check whether it's
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.

llvm-svn: 178563
2013-04-02 19:38:47 +00:00
Richard Smith c2bc61b006 Bring inheriting constructor implementation up-to-date with current defect
reports, and implement implicit definition of inheriting constructors.
Remaining missing features: inheriting constructor templates, implicit
exception specifications for inheriting constructors, inheriting constructors
from dependent bases.

llvm-svn: 177320
2013-03-18 21:12:30 +00:00
Bill Wendling 5ea6a89e52 Try to get buildbots to pass these tests.
llvm-svn: 175784
2013-02-21 19:44:18 +00:00
Bill Wendling 4467d79ad4 Attempt to clean up tests for non-X86 platforms.
llvm-svn: 175652
2013-02-20 19:30:01 +00:00
Bill Wendling cc5224ceb8 Remove target-specific features.
llvm-svn: 175610
2013-02-20 08:01:34 +00:00
Bill Wendling c33fc4c004 Modify the tests to use attribute group references instead of listing the
function attributes.

llvm-svn: 175606
2013-02-20 07:22:19 +00:00
Dmitri Gribenko 4e472b6328 Add a test for r174980, that we used to accept
llvm-svn: 175005
2013-02-12 20:43:41 +00:00
Dmitri Gribenko d1c91f1763 Accept over-qualified constructor in MSVC emulation mode
MSVC accepts this:

class A {
  A::A();
};

Clang accepts regular member functions with extra qualification as an MS
extension, but not constructors.  This changes the parser to defer rejecting
qualified constructors so that the same Sema logic can apply to constructors as
regular member functions.  This also improves the error message when MS
extensions are disabled (in my opinion). Before it was:

/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:8: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
  A::A();
  ~~~~ ^
1 error generated.

After:

/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:6: error: extra qualification on member 'A'
  A::A();
  ~~~^
1 error generated.

Patch by Jason Haslam.

llvm-svn: 174980
2013-02-12 17:27:41 +00:00
Richard Smith de1a487402 Improve diagnostic wording for when an implicitly-deleted special member
function is selected by overload resolution.

llvm-svn: 171190
2012-12-28 12:23:24 +00:00
Richard Smith bd3051272c PR14558: Compute triviality of special members (etc) at the end of the class
definition, rather than at the end of the definition of the set of nested
classes. We still defer checking of the user-specified exception specification
to the end of the nesting -- we can't check that until we've parsed the
in-class initializers for non-static data members.

llvm-svn: 169805
2012-12-11 01:14:52 +00:00
Richard Smith 6b02d46dae Finish implementing 'selected constructor' rules for triviality in C++11. In
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.

In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.

As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):

struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };

llvm-svn: 169673
2012-12-08 08:32:28 +00:00
Richard Smith 92f241f188 Properly compute triviality for explicitly-defaulted or deleted special members.
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.

This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.

This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.

llvm-svn: 169667
2012-12-08 02:53:02 +00:00
Richard Smith 1c33fe8fea Store on the CXXRecordDecl whether the class has, or would have, a copy
constructor/assignment operator with a const-qualified parameter type. The
prior method for determining this incorrectly used overload resolution.

llvm-svn: 168775
2012-11-28 06:23:12 +00:00
Richard Smith 52c0b58d33 Fix some wrong-code bugs in implicitly-defined assignment operators:
- In C++11, perform overload resolution over all assignment operators, rather than just looking for copy/move assignment operators.
 - Clean up after temporaries produced by operator= immediately, rather than accumulating them until the end of the function.

llvm-svn: 167798
2012-11-13 00:54:12 +00:00
Richard Smith 66f3ac9d21 Rework implementation of DR1492: Apply the resolution to operator delete too,
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.

llvm-svn: 166372
2012-10-20 08:26:51 +00:00
Andy Gibbs c6e68daac0 Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.
llvm-svn: 166280
2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
Richard Smith 1ee6352788 DR1492: In a definition of a destructor, the exception specification must be
explicitly specified iff it was specified in the declaration.

llvm-svn: 166071
2012-10-16 23:30:16 +00:00
Richard Smith af136f8191 PR13381, part 2: when determining if a defaulted special member function should
be defined as deleted, take cv-qualifiers on class members into account when
looking up the copy or move constructor or assignment operator which will be
used for them.

llvm-svn: 160418
2012-07-18 03:51:16 +00:00
Richard Smith 12f247f43f PR13051: If a constructor is explicitly defaulted, it isn't marked as being
constexpr until we get to the end of the class definition. When that happens,
be sure to remember that the class actually does have a constexpr constructor.

This is a stopgap solution, which still doesn't cover the case of a class with
multiple copy constructors (only some of which are constexpr). We should be
performing constructor lookup when implicitly defining a constructor in order
to determine whether all constructors it invokes are constexpr.

llvm-svn: 158228
2012-06-08 21:09:22 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c65e1598ad A non-explicit constructor template with a second parameter that is a
parameter pack is a converting constructor. Fixes PR13003.

llvm-svn: 158040
2012-06-05 23:44:51 +00:00
Nuno Lopes 729e6a056c hopefully fix a bunch of ARM buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 156513
2012-05-09 21:21:49 +00:00
Richard Smith e2648bac3a A union can have a constexpr defaulted default constructor, if it has an
in-class initializer for one of its fields. Value-initialization of such
a type should use the in-class initializer!

The former was just a bug, the latter is a (reported) standard defect.

llvm-svn: 156274
2012-05-07 01:07:30 +00:00