Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the implementation is known-broken for certain inputs,
the bugreport was up for a significant amount of timer,
and there has been no activity to address it.
Therefore, just completely rip out all of misexpect handling.
I suspect, fixing it requires redesigning the internals of MD_misexpect.
Should anyone commit to fixing the implementation problem,
starting from clean slate may be better anyways.
This reverts commit 7bdad08429,
and some of it's follow-ups, that don't stand on their own.
Old GCC used to aggressively fold VLAs to constant-bound arrays at block
scope in GNU mode. That's non-conforming, and more modern versions of
GCC only do this at file scope. Update Clang to do the same.
Also promote the warning for this from off-by-default to on-by-default
in all cases; more recent versions of GCC likewise warn on this by
default.
This is still slightly more permissive than GCC, as pointed out in
PR44406, as we still fold VLAs to constant arrays in structs, but that
seems justifiable given that we don't support VLA-in-struct (and don't
intend to ever support it), but GCC does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89523
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371635
This reverts commit r371584. It introduced a dependency from compiler-rt
to llvm/include/ADT, which is problematic for multiple reasons.
One is that it is a novel dependency edge, which needs cross-compliation
machinery for llvm/include/ADT (yes, it is true that right now
compiler-rt included only header-only libraries, however, if we allow
compiler-rt to depend on anything from ADT, other libraries will
eventually get used).
Secondly, depending on ADT from compiler-rt exposes ADT symbols from
compiler-rt, which would cause ODR violations when Clang is built with
the profile library.
llvm-svn: 371598
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371584
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371484
Paul Kirth