Instead of dumping the string literal (which
quotes it and escape every non-ascii symbol),
we can use the content of the string when it is a
8 byte string.
Wide, UTF-8/UTF-16/32 strings are still completely
escaped, until we clarify how these entities should
behave (cf https://wg21.link/p2361).
`FormatDiagnostic` is modified to escape
non printable characters and invalid UTF-8.
This ensures that unicode characters, spaces and new
lines are properly rendered in static messages.
This make clang more consistent with other implementation
and fixes this tweet
https://twitter.com/jfbastien/status/1298307325443231744 :)
Of note, `PaddingChecker` did print out new lines that were
later removed by the diagnostic printing code.
To be consistent with its tests, the new lines are removed
from the diagnostic.
Unicode tables updated to both use the Unicode definitions
and the Unicode 14.0 data.
U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN is still considered a print character
to match existing practices in terminals, in addition of
being considered a formatting character as per Unicode.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108469
Use the if/while statement right paren location instead of the end of the
condition expression to determine if the semicolon is on its own line, for the
purpose of not warning about code like this:
while (foo())
;
Using the condition location meant that we would also not report a warning on
code like this:
while (MACRO(a,
b));
body();
The right paren loc wasn't stored in the AST or passed into Sema::ActOnIfStmt
when this logic was first written.
Reviewed By: rnk, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128406
This patch implements a necessary part of P0848, the overload resolution for destructors.
It is now possible to overload destructors based on constraints, and the eligible destructor
will be selected at the end of the class.
The approach this patch takes is to perform the overload resolution in Sema::ActOnFields
and to mark the selected destructor using a new property in FunctionDeclBitfields.
CXXRecordDecl::getDestructor is then modified to use this property to return the correct
destructor.
This closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45614.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126194
From [class.copy.ctor]:
```
A non-template constructor for class X is a copy constructor if its first
parameter is of type X&, const X&, volatile X& or const volatile X&, and
either there are no other parameters or else all other parameters have
default arguments (9.3.4.7).
A copy/move constructor for class X is trivial if it is not user-provided and if:
- class X has no virtual functions (11.7.3) and no virtual base classes (11.7.2), and
- the constructor selected to copy/move each direct base class subobject is trivial, and
- or each non-static data member of X that is of class type (or array thereof),
the constructor selected to copy/move that member is trivial;
otherwise the copy/move constructor is non-trivial.
```
So `T(T&) = default`; should be trivial assuming that the previous
provisions are met.
This works in GCC, but not in Clang at the moment:
https://godbolt.org/z/fTGe71b6P
Reviewed By: royjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127593
This redoes D103040 in a way that `AlwaysIncludeTypeForTemplateArgument = false`
policy is honored for printing template specialization types.
This can be seen for example when printing a canonicalized
dependent TemplateSpecializationType which has integral arguments.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: v.g.vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126620
Our rules to determine if the throw expression are within the variable
scope were giving a false negative result in case the throw expression
would appear within a decltype in a nested function declaration.
Per P2266R3, the relevant rule is: [expr.prim.id.unqual]/2
```
if the id-expression (possibly parenthesized) is the operand of a throw-expression, and names an implicitly movable entity that belongs to a scope that does not contain the compound-statement of the innermost lambda-expression, try-block , or function-try-block (if any) whose compound-statement or ctor-initializer encloses the throw-expression.
```
This fixes PR54341.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127075
While it's not as robust as using the attribute on enums/classes (the
type information may be lost through a function pointer, a declaration
or use of the underlying type without using the typedef, etc) but I
think there's still value in being able to attribute a typedef and have
all return types written with that typedef pick up the
warn_unused_result behavior.
Specifically I'd like to be able to annotate LLVMErrorRef (a wrapper for
llvm::Error used in the C API - the underlying type is a raw pointer, so
it can't be attributed itself) to reduce the chance of unhandled errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102122
Const class members may be initialized with a defaulted default
constructor under the same conditions it would be allowed for a const
object elsewhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126170
The standard says:
The optional requires-clause ([temp.pre]) in an init-declarator or
member-declarator shall be present only if the declarator declares a
templated function ([dcl.fct]).
This implements that limitation, and updates the tests to the best of my
ability to capture the intent of the original checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125711
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.
This reverts commit 45c07db31c.
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
This reverts commit a97899108e.
The patch caused some problems with the libc++ `__range_adaptor_closure`
that I haven't been able to figure out the cause of, so I am reverting
while I figure out whether this is a solvable problem/issue with the
CFE, or libc++ depending on an older 'incorrect' behavior.
This reverts commit 0c31da4838.
I've solved the issue with the PointerUnion by making the
`FunctionTemplateDecl` pointer be a NamedDecl, that could be a
`FunctionDecl` or `FunctionTemplateDecl` depending. This is enforced
with an assert.
This reverts commit 4b6c2cd647.
The patch caused numerous ARM 32 bit build failures, since we added a
5th item to the PointerUnion, and went over the 2-bits available in the
32 bit pointers.
As reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44178
Concepts are not supposed to be instantiated until they are checked, so
this patch implements that and goes through significant amounts of work
to make sure we properly re-instantiate the concepts correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544
When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.
Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
Now the implementation would accept following code:
```
//--- impl.cppm
module M:impl;
class A {};
//--- M.cppm
export module M;
import :impl;
//--- Use.cpp
import M;
void test() {
A a; // Expected error. A is not visible here.
}
```
which is clearly wrong. The root cause is the implementation of
`isInCurrentModule` would return true if the module is a partition! So
in the above example, although Use.cpp is not a module unit,
`isInCurrentModule ` would still return true when the compiler tries to
see if the owning module of `A` is the current module. I believe this is
an oversight. This patch tries to fix this problem.
Reviewed By: iains
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123837
This reverts commit 69dd89fdcb.
This reverts commit 04000c2f92.
The current states breaks libstdc++ usage (https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3455423).
The fixup has been reverted as it caused other valid code to be disallowed.
I think we should start from the clean state by reverting all relevant commits.
D119136 changed how captures are handled in a lambda call operator
declaration, but did not properly handled dependant context,
which led to crash when refering to init-captures in
a trailing return type.
We fix that bug by making transformations more symetric with parsing,
ie. we first create the call operator, then transform the capture,
then compute the type of the lambda call operaror.
This ensures captures exist and have the right type when
we parse a trailing requires-clause / return type.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124012
When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.
Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start
of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that
captures would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope,
followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope
between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach
the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured
variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from
the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope.
But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that
conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context,
we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point,
we can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context,
unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also
transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope.
When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda,
we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
This is a recommit of adff142dc2 after a fix in d8d793f29b
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
This reverts commit adff142dc2.
This broke clang bootstrap: it made existing C++ code in LLVM invalid:
llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveInterval.h:630:53: error: captured variable 'Idx' cannot appear here
[=](std::remove_reference_t<decltype(*Idx)> V,
^
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
According to CWG 1394 and C++20 [dcl.fct.def.general]p2,
Clang should not diagnose incomplete types if function body is "= delete;".
For example:
```
struct Incomplete;
Incomplete f(Incomplete) = delete; // well-formed
```
Also close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52802
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122981
This adjusts the handling for:
export module M;
export namespace {};
export namespace N {};
export using namespace N;
In the first case, we were allowing empty anonymous namespaces
as part of an extension allowing empty top-level entities, but that seems
inappropriate in this case, since the linkage would be internal for the
anonymous namespace. We now report an error for this.
The second case was producing a warning diagnostic that this was
accepted as an extension - however the C++20 standard does allow this
as well-formed.
In the third case we keep the current practice that this is accepted with a
warning (as an extension). The C++20 standard says it's an error.
We also ensure that using decls are only applied to items with external linkage.
This adjusts error messages for exports involving redeclarations in modules to
be more specific about the reason that the decl has been rejected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
Implement a demangleable strong ownership symbol mangling.
* The original module symbol mangling scheme turned out to be
undemangleable.
* The hoped-for C++17 compatibility of weak ownership turns out to be
fragile
* C++20 now has better ways of controlling C++17 compatibility
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
GCC implements this new mangling.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122256
Chuanqi Xu