It returns just a section_iterator currently and have a report_fatal_error call inside.
This change adds a way to return errors and handle them on caller sides.
The patch also changes/improves current users and adds test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69167
llvm-svn: 375408
r360876 didn't fix 2 call sites in clang.
Expected<ArrayRef<uint8_t>> may be better but use Expected<StringRef> for now.
Follow-up of D61781.
llvm-svn: 360892
It broke the Clang build, see llvm-commits thread.
> Expected<ArrayRef<uint8_t>> may be better but use Expected<StringRef> for now.
>
> Follow-up of D61781.
llvm-svn: 360878
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
In a lot of places an empty string was passed as the ErrorBanner to
logAllUnhandledErrors. This patch makes that argument optional to
simplify the call sites.
llvm-svn: 346604
We have a few functions that virtually all command wants to run on
process startup/shutdown. This patch adds InitLLVM class to do that
all at once, so that we don't need to copy-n-paste boilerplate code
to each llvm command's main() function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45602
llvm-svn: 330046
This is forcing to use Error::success(), which is in a wide majority
of cases a lot more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26481
llvm-svn: 286561
iterating over an archive with object and non-object members that
would cause an Abort because to was not calling consumeError()
when the code was wanting to ignore a non-object file.
Found by Justin Bogner!
llvm-svn: 284867
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D22079
Changes the Archive::child_begin and Archive::children to require a reference
to an Error. If iterator increment fails (because the archive header is
damaged) the iterator will be set to 'end()', and the error stored in the
given Error&. The Error value should be checked by the user immediately after
the loop. E.g.:
Error Err;
for (auto &C : A->children(Err)) {
// Do something with archive child C.
}
// Check the error immediately after the loop.
if (Err)
return Err;
Failure to check the Error will result in an abort() when the Error goes out of
scope (as guaranteed by the Error class).
llvm-svn: 275316
a good error message to be produced.
This is nearly the last libObject interface that used ErrorOr and the last one
that appears in llvm/include/llvm/Object/MachO.h . For Mach-O objects this is
just a clean up because it’s version of getSymbolAddress() can’t return an
error.
I will leave it to the experts on COFF and ELF to actually add meaning full
error messages in their tests if they wish. And also leave it to these experts
to change the last two ErrorOr interfaces in llvm/include/llvm/Object/ObjectFile.h
for createCOFFObjectFile() and createELFObjectFile() if they wish.
Since there are no test cases for COFF and ELF error cases with respect to
getSymbolAddress() in the test suite this is no functional change (NFC).
llvm-svn: 273701
looking for it along $PATH. This allows installs of LLVM tools outside of
$PATH to find the symbolizer and produce pretty backtraces if they crash.
llvm-svn: 272232
when the object is in an archive to use something like libx.a(foo.o) as part of
the error message.
Also changed llvm-objdump and llvm-size to be like llvm-nm and ignore non-object
files in archives and not produce any error message.
To do this Archive::Child::getAsBinary() was changed from ErrorOr<...> to
Expected<...> then that was threaded up to its users.
Converting this interface to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. To contain the changes for now the use of
errorToErrorCode() is still used in one place yet to be fully converted.
Again there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comments for those.
llvm-svn: 269784
Produce another specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file when a symbol’s
section index is more than the number of sections. The existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
for macho-invalid-section-index-getSectionRawName now reports the error with the message indicating
that a symbol at a specific index has a bad section index and that bad section index value.
Again converting interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. Where the existing code reported the error with a
string message or an error code it was converted to do the same.
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
"// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully" and a call something like
consumeError(NameOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
llvm-svn: 268298
Produce another specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file when a symbol’s
string index is past the end of the string table. The existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
for macho-invalid-symbol-name-past-eof now reports the error with the message indicating
that a symbol at a specific index has a bad sting index and that bad string index value.
Again converting interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. Where the existing code reported the error with a
string message or an error code it was converted to do the same. There is some
code for this that could be factored into a routine but I would like to leave that for
the code owners post-commit to do as they want for handling an llvm::Error. An
example of how this could be done is shown in the diff in
lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RuntimeDyldImpl.h which had a Check() routine
already for std::error_code so I added one like it for llvm::Error .
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(NameOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there fixes needed to lld that goes along with this that I will commit right after this.
So expect lld not to built after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 266919
Produce the first specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file describing
the problem instead of the generic message for object_error::parse_failed of
"Invalid data was encountered while parsing the file”. Many more good error
messages will follow after this first one.
This is built on Lang Hames’ great work of adding the ’Error' class for
structured error handling and threading Error through MachOObjectFile
construction. And making createMachOObjectFile return Expected<...> .
So to to get the error to the llvm-obdump tool, I changed the stack of
these methods to also return Expected<...> :
object::ObjectFile::createObjectFile()
object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile()
object::createBinary()
Then finally in ParseInputMachO() in MachODump.cpp the error can
be reported and the specific error message can be printed in llvm-objdump
and can be seen in the existing test case for the existing malformed binary
but with the updated error message.
Converting these interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. To contain the changes for now use of
errorToErrorCode() and errorOrToExpected() are used where the callers
are yet to be converted.
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(ObjOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there is one fix also needed to lld/COFF/InputFiles.cpp that goes along
with this that I will commit right after this. So expect lld not to built
after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 265606
The needed lld matching changes to be submitted immediately next,
but this revision will cause lld failures with this alone which is expected.
This removes the eating of the error in Archive::Child::getSize() when the characters
in the size field in the archive header for the member is not a number. To do this we
have all of the needed methods return ErrorOr to push them up until we get out of lib.
Then the tools and can handle the error in whatever way is appropriate for that tool.
So the solution is to plumb all the ErrorOr stuff through everything that touches archives.
This include its iterators as one can create an Archive object but the first or any other
Child object may fail to be created due to a bad size field in its header.
Thanks to Lang Hames on the changes making child_iterator contain an
ErrorOr<Child> instead of a Child and the needed changes to ErrorOr.h to add
operator overloading for * and -> .
We don’t want to use llvm_unreachable() as it calls abort() and is produces a “crash”
and using report_fatal_error() to move the error checking will cause the program to
stop, neither of which are really correct in library code. There are still some uses of
these that should be cleaned up in this library code for other than the size field.
The test cases use archives with text files so one can see the non-digit character,
in this case a ‘%’, in the size field.
These changes will require corresponding changes to the lld project. That will be
committed immediately after this change. But this revision will cause lld failures
with this alone which is expected.
llvm-svn: 252192
in the size field in the archive header for the member is not a number. To do this we
have all of the needed methods return ErrorOr to push them up until we get out of lib.
Then the tools and can handle the error in whatever way is appropriate for that tool.
So the solution is to plumb all the ErrorOr stuff through everything that touches archives.
This include its iterators as one can create an Archive object but the first or any other
Child object may fail to be created due to a bad size field in its header.
Thanks to Lang Hames on the changes making child_iterator contain an
ErrorOr<Child> instead of a Child and the needed changes to ErrorOr.h to add
operator overloading for * and -> .
We don’t want to use llvm_unreachable() as it calls abort() and is produces a “crash”
and using report_fatal_error() to move the error checking will cause the program to
stop, neither of which are really correct in library code. There are still some uses of
these that should be cleaned up in this library code for other than the size field.
Also corrected the code where the size gets us to the “at the end of the archive”
which is OK but past the end of the archive will return object_error::parse_failed now.
The test cases use archives with text files so one can see the non-digit character,
in this case a ‘%’, in the size field.
llvm-svn: 250906
We already fail with 'No such file or directory' when we try to open
the file -- if that doesn't exist. Also add a test to verify this behavior.
llvm-svn: 247744
This function can really fail since the string table offset can be out of
bounds.
Using ErrorOr makes sure the error is checked.
Hopefully a lot of the boilerplate code in tools/* can go away once we have
a diagnostic manager in Object.
llvm-svn: 241297
On ELF that was already the case since getting the size of a symbol
never fails.
On MachO and COFF we could fail trying to get the section of a symbol. But
we don't really need the section, just the section number to know if two
symbols are in the same section or not.
llvm-svn: 240580
George Rimar