Only the first two items for now, changing Sections 8.5.4 [dcl.init.list] paragraph 3 and 13.3.1.7 [over.match.list] paragraph 1,
so that defining class objects and character arrays using uniform initialization syntax is actually treated as list initialization
and before it is treated aggregate initialization.
llvm-svn: 227022
and only update the orginal list on a valid arugment list. When checking an
individual expression template argument, and conversions are required, update
the expression in the template argument. Since template arguments are
speculatively checked, the copying of the template argument list prevents
updating the template arguments when the list does not match the template.
Additionally, clean up the integer checking code in the template diffing code.
The code performs unneccessary conversions from APSInt to APInt.
Fixes PR21758.
This essentially reverts r224770 to recommits r224667 and r224668 with extra
changes to prevent the template instantiation problems seen in PR22006.
A test to catch the discovered problem is also added.
llvm-svn: 226983
"omp atomic read [seq_cst]" accepts expressions "v=x;". In this patch we perform
an atomic load of "x" (using builtin atomic loading instructions or a call to
"atomic_load()" for simple lvalues and "kmpc_atomic_start();load
<x>;kmpc_atomic_end();" for other lvalues), convert the result of loading to
type of "v" (using EmitScalarConversion() for simple types and
EmitComplexToScalarConversion() for conversions from complex to scalar) and then
store the result in "v".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6431
llvm-svn: 226784
The lowering looks a lot like normal EH lowering, with the exception
that the exceptions are caught by executing filter expression code
instead of matching typeinfo globals. The filter expressions are
outlined into functions which are used in landingpad clauses where
typeinfo would normally go.
Major aspects that still need work:
- Non-call exceptions in __try bodies won't work yet. The plan is to
outline the __try block in the frontend to keep things simple.
- Filter expressions cannot use local variables until capturing is
implemented.
- __finally blocks will not run after exceptions. Fixing this requires
work in the LLVM SEH preparation pass.
The IR lowering looks like this:
// C code:
bool safe_div(int n, int d, int *r) {
__try {
*r = normal_div(n, d);
} __except(_exception_code() == EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
; LLVM IR:
define i32 @filter(i8* %e, i8* %fp) {
%ehptrs = bitcast i8* %e to i32**
%ehrec = load i32** %ehptrs
%code = load i32* %ehrec
%matches = icmp eq i32 %code, i32 u0xC0000094
%matches.i32 = zext i1 %matches to i32
ret i32 %matches.i32
}
define i1 zeroext @safe_div(i32 %n, i32 %d, i32* %r) {
%rr = invoke i32 @normal_div(i32 %n, i32 %d)
to label %normal unwind to label %lpad
normal:
store i32 %rr, i32* %r
ret i1 1
lpad:
%ehvals = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__C_specific_handler
catch i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*)
%ehptr = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 0
%sel = extractvalue {i8*, i32} %ehvals, i32 1
%filter_sel = call i32 @llvm.eh.seh.typeid.for(i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @filter to i8*))
%matches = icmp eq i32 %sel, %filter_sel
br i1 %matches, label %eh.except, label %eh.resume
eh.except:
ret i1 false
eh.resume:
resume
}
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5607
llvm-svn: 226760
The improved completion in call context now works with:
- Functions.
- Member functions.
- Constructors.
- New expressions.
- Function call expressions.
- Template variants of the previous.
There are still rough edges to be fixed:
- Provide support for optional parameters. (fix known)
- Provide support for member initializers. (fix known)
- Provide support for variadic template functions. (fix unknown)
- Others?
llvm-svn: 226670
We didn't consider any alignment attributes on an EnumDecl when
calculating alignment.
While we are here, ignore alignment specifications on typedef types if
one is used as the underlying type. Otherwise, weird things happen:
enum Y : int;
Y y;
typedef int __attribute__((aligned(64))) u;
enum Y : u {};
What is the alignment of 'Y'? It would be more consistent with the
overall design of enums with fixed underlying types to consider the
underlying type's UnqualifiedDesugaredType.
This fixes PR22279.
llvm-svn: 226653
be corrected.
This fixes PR22250, which exposed the bug where if there's more than one
TypoExpr in the arguments, once one failed to be corrected none of the
TypoExprs after it would be handled at all thanks to an early return.
llvm-svn: 226624
The test was fixed after a discussion with the revision author: the check
pattern was made more flexible as the "%call" part is not what we actually want
to check strictly there.
The original patch description:
===
Introduce SPIR calling conventions.
This implements Section 3.7 from the SPIR 1.2 spec:
SPIR kernels should use "spir_kernel" calling convention.
Non-kernel functions use "spir_func" calling convention. All
other calling conventions are disallowed.
The patch works only for OpenCL source. Any other uses will need
to ensure that kernels are assigned the spir_kernel calling
convention correctly.
===
llvm-svn: 226561
This implements Section 3.7 from the SPIR 1.2 spec:
SPIR kernels should use "spir_kernel" calling convention.
Non-kernel functions use "spir_func" calling convention. All
other calling conventions are disallowed.
The patch works only for OpenCL source. Any other uses will need
to ensure that kernels are assigned the spir_kernel calling
convention correctly.
llvm-svn: 226548
Things that are OK:
extern int var1 __attribute((alias("v1")));
static int var2 __attribute((alias("v2")));
Things that are not OK:
int var3 __attribute((alias("v3")));
extern int var4 __attribute((alias("v4"))) = 4;
We choose to accpet:
struct S { static int var5 __attribute((alias("v5"))); };
This code causes assertion failues in GCC 4.8 and ICC 13.0.1, we have
no reason to reject it.
This partially fixes PR22217.
llvm-svn: 226436
If an unscoped enum is used as a nested name specifier and the language dialect
is not C++ 11, issue an extension warning.
This fixes PR16951.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6389
llvm-svn: 226413
Clang currently crashes on
class C {
C() = default;
C() = delete;
};
My cunning plan for fixing this was to change the `if (!FnD)` in
Parser::ParseCXXInlineMethodDef() to `if (!FnD || FnD->isInvalidDecl)` – but
alas, the second constructor decl wasn't marked as invalid. This lets
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl() return true on function redeclarations, which leads
to them being marked invalid.
This also improves error messages when functions are redeclared.
llvm-svn: 226365
As mentioned in the previous commit, if a property (declared with @property)
has a name that matches a special Objective-C method family, the getter picks
up that family despite being declared by the property. The most correct way
to solve this problem is to add the 'objc_method_family' attribute to the
getter with an argument of 'none', which unfortunately requires an explicit
declaration of the getter.
This commit adds a note to the existing error (ARC) or warning (MRR) for
such a poorly-named property that suggests the solution; if there's already
a declaration of the getter, it even includes a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 226339
ambiguity but wasn't.
In the new test case, "click" wasn't being corrected properly because
Sema::ClassifyName would call CorrectTypo for "click" then later
Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup would call CorrectTypoDelayed for the same use
of "click" (the former by the parser needing to determine what the
identifier is so it knows how to parse the statement, i.e. is it the
beginning of a declaration or an expression). CorrectTypo would record
that typo correction for "click" failed and CorrectTypoDelayed would see
that and not even try to correct the typo, even though in this case
CorrectTypo failed due to an ambiguity (both "Click" and "clock" having
an edit distance of one from "click") that could be resolved with more
information. The fix is two-fold:
1) Have CorrectTypo not record failed corrections if the reason for
the failure was two or more corrections with the same edit
distance, and
2) Make the CorrectionCandidateCallback used by
Parser::ParseCastExpression reject FunctionDecl candidates when the
next token after the identifier is a ".", "=", or "->" since
functions cannot be assigned to and do not have members that can be
referenced.
The reason for two correction spots is that from r222549 until r224375
landed, the first correction attempt would fail completely but the
second would suggest "clock" while having the note point to the
declaration of "Click".
llvm-svn: 226334
storage.
This fix allows to use non-constant global variables, static local variables and static data
members in data-sharing attribute clauses in parallel and task regions.
llvm-svn: 226250
Clang would previously become confused and crash here.
It does not make a lot of sense to export these, so warning seems appropriate.
MSVC will export some member functions for this kind of specializations, whereas
MinGW ignores the dllexport-edness. The latter behaviour seems better.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6984
llvm-svn: 226208
Sema calls HandleVTable() with a bool parameter which is then threaded through
three layers. The only effect of this bool is an early return at the last
layer.
Instead, remove this parameter and call HandleVTable() only if the bool is
true. No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 226096
prior visible declaration. Prefer to take template parameter names from the
first declaration.
Testcase from a patch by Francisco Lopes!
llvm-svn: 226083
Sorry for the noise, I managed to miss a bunch of recent regressions of
include orderings here. This should actually sort all the includes for
Clang. Again, no functionality changed, this is just a mechanical
cleanup that I try to run periodically to keep the #include lines as
regular as possible across the project.
llvm-svn: 225979
We would check the type information from the declaration found by lookup
but we would neglect checking compatibility with the most recent
declaration. This would make it possible for us to not correctly
diagnose inconsistencies with declarations which were made in a
different scope.
llvm-svn: 225934
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
This is a different approach to r225780.
llvm-svn: 225875
conflicting attribute, warn about the conflict and pick a "winning"
attribute to preserve, instead of emitting an error. This matches the
behavior when the conflicting attributes are on different declarations.
Along the way I discovered that conflicts involving __forceinline were
reported as 'always_inline' (alternate spelling, same attribute) so
fixed that up to report the attribute as spelled in the source.
llvm-svn: 225813
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
llvm-svn: 225780
We'd crash trying to make the SourceRange for the tokens we'd like to
highlight. Don't assume there is more than one token makes up the
default argument.
llvm-svn: 225774
There are two things in a C++ program that need to read the vtable pointer:
Constructors and destructors. (A few other operations -- virtual calls,
dynamic cast, rtti -- read the vtable pointer off a this pointer, but for
this they don't need the vtable symbol.) Implicit constructors and destructors
and explicit constructors already marked the vtable as used, but explicit
destructors didn't.
Note that the only thing sema's "mark a class's vtable used" does is to mark all
final overriders of the class as referenced, it does _not_ cause emission of
the vtable itself. This is done on demand by codegen, independent of sema,
since sema might emit functions that are not referenced. (The exception are
vtables that are forced via key functions -- these are forced onto codegen
by sema.)
This bug went unnoticed for years because it doesn't have observable effects
(yet -- I want to change this in PR20337, which is why I noticed this).
r213109 made it so that _calls_ to constructors don't mark the vtable used.
Currently, _calls_ to destructors still mark the vtable used. If that
wasn't the case, this program would tickle the problem:
test.h:
template <typename T>
struct B {
int* p;
virtual ~B() { delete p; }
virtual void f() {}
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) C {
C();
B<int> m;
};
test2.cc:
#include "test.h"
int main() {
C* c = new C;
delete c;
}
test3.cc:
#include "test.h"
C::C() {}
# This bin/clang++ binary doesn't MarkVTableUsed() for virtual dtor calls:
$ bin/clang++ -shared test3.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -o libtest3.dylib
$ bin/clang++ test2.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden libtest3.dylib
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"B<int>::f()", referenced from:
vtable for B<int> in test2-af8f4f.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
What's happening here is that there's a copy of B's vtable hidden in
libtest3.dylib, because C's constructor caused an implicit instantiation of that
(and implicit constructors generate vtables).
test2.cc calls C's destructDr, which destroys the B<int> member,
which wants to overwrite the vtable back to B (think of B as the base of a class
hierarchy, and of hierarchical destruction -- maybe we shouldn't do the vtable
writing in destructors of final classes), but there's nothing in test2.cc that
marks B's vtable used. So codegen writes out the vtable, but since it wasn't
marked used, sema didn't mark all the virtual functions (in particular f())
as used.
Note that this change makes us reject programs we didn't reject before (see
the included Sema test case), but both gcc and cl also reject this code, and
clang used to reject it before r213109.
llvm-svn: 225761
-Wself-move is similiar to -Wself-assign. This warning is triggered when
a value is attempted to be moved to itself. See r221008 for a bug that
would have been caught with this warning.
llvm-svn: 225581
We have a diagnostic describing that constexpr changed in C++14 when
compiling in C++11 mode. While doing this, it examines the previous
declaration and assumes that it is a function. However it is possible,
in the context of error recovery, for this to not be the case.
llvm-svn: 225518
Parser::ParseNamespace can get a little confused when it found itself
inside a compound statement inside of a non-static data member
initializer.
Try to determine that the statement expression's scope makes sense
before trying to parse it's contents.
llvm-svn: 225514
We assumed that class-scope specializations would result in a
CXXMethodDecl for that class. However, globally qualified functions
will result in normal FunctionDecls.
llvm-svn: 225508
we're instantiating, if there's a ParmVarDecl within a FunctionDecl context
that is not a parameter of that function. Add some asserts to catch this kind
of issue more generally, and fix another bug exposed by those asserts where we
were missing a local instantiation scope around substitution of
explicitly-specified template arguments.
llvm-svn: 225490
better than the 'template-parameter-x-y' name that we'd get in AST printing,
and is worse in several ways (it's harder to distinguish it from a
user-supplied name, it's wrong after substituting some number of outer
levels, it wastes time and space constructing an IdentifierInfo, ...).
llvm-svn: 225489
transform.
Also diagnose typos in the initializer of an invalid C++ declaration.
Both issues were hit using the same line of test code, depending on
whether the code was treated as C or C++.
Fixes PR22092.
llvm-svn: 225389
Add additional constraint checking for target specific behaviour for inline
assembly constraints. We would previously silently let all arguments through
for these constraints. In cases where the constraints were violated, we could
end up failing to select instructions and triggering assertions or worse,
silently ignoring instructions.
llvm-svn: 225244
Also add a few asserts for this. The existing code assumes this in a bunch
of places already (see e.g. the assert at the top of ParseTypedefDecl(), and
there are many unchecked calls on the result of GetTypeForDeclarator()), and
from looking through the code this should always be true from what I can tell.
This allows removing ASTContext::getNullTypeSourceInfo() too as that's now
unused.
No behavior change intended.
llvm-svn: 225125
Many places in Sema cannot handle isNull() types. This is fine, because in
most places the type building code recovers by falling back to IntTy. In
GetFullTypeForDeclarator(), this is done at the end of the getNumTypeObjects()
loop body. This function calls BuildQualifiedType() before this fallback is
done though, so it explicitly needs to check for isNull() types.
llvm-svn: 225124
The FIXME in the test is caused by TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXRecordDecl
returning a nullptr instead of creating an invalid decl. This is a common
pattern across all of TemplateDeclInstantiator, so I'm not comfortable changing
it. The reason it's not invalid in the class template is due to support for an
MSVC extension, see r137573.
llvm-svn: 225071
clang tries to produce a helpful diagnostic for the traiilng '...', but the
code that r216778 added for this doesn't expect an invalid trailing return type.
Add code to explicitly handle this.
Having explicit code for this but not for other things looks a bit strange, but
trailing return types are special in that they have a separate existence bit in
addition to the type (see r158348).
llvm-svn: 224974
GCC permits array l-values in asm output operands even though they
aren't modifiable l-values. We used to permit it but this behavior
regressed in r224916.
llvm-svn: 224918
Functions are l-values in C++ but shouldn't be available as output
parameters in inline assembly. Neither should overloaded function
l-values.
This fixes PR21949.
llvm-svn: 224916
hasDeclaratorForAnonDecl, getDeclaratorForAnonDecl and
getTypedefNameForAnonDecl are expected to handle the case where
NamedDeclOrQualifier holds the wrong type or nothing at all.
llvm-svn: 224912
We expected the type of a TagDecl to be a TagType, not an
InjectedClassNameType. Introduced a helper method, Type::getAsTagDecl,
to abstract away the difference; redefine Type::getAsCXXRecordDecl to be
in terms of it.
llvm-svn: 224898
Remove ObjCMethodList::Count, instead store a "has more than one decl" bit in
the low bit of the ObjCMethodDecl pointer, using a PointerIntPair.
Most of this patch is replacing ".Method" with ".getMethod()".
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 224876
When a non-type template argument expression needs a conversion to change it
into the argument type, preserve that information by remaking the
TemplateArgument with an expression that has those conversions. Also a small
fix to template type diffing to handle the extra conversions in some cases.
llvm-svn: 224667
Consider a template class with attributes on a method, and an explicit
specialization of that method:
template <int>
struct A {
void foo() final;
};
template <>
void A<0>::foo() {}
In this example, the attribute is `final`, but it might also be an
__attribute__((visibility("foo"))), noreturn, inline, etc. clang's current
behavior is to strip all attributes, which for some attributes is wrong
(the snippet above allows a subclass of A<0> to override the final method, for
example) and for others disagrees with gcc.
So stop dropping attributes. r95845 added this code without a test case, and
r176728 added the code for dropping attributes on parameters (with tests, but
they still pass).
As an additional wrinkle, do drop dllimport and dllexport, since that's how
these two attributes work. (This is covered by existing tests.)
Fixes PR21942.
The approach is by Richard Smith, initial analysis and typing was done by me.
With this, clang also matches GCC and EDG on all attributes Richard tested.
llvm-svn: 224651
This reverts commit r224451. It caused us to reject some valid existing
code.
This code appears to run in non-error cases as well as error cases. If
the scope of a DependentScopeDeclRefExpr is still incomplete it probably
means we still have more instantiation to do.
llvm-svn: 224526
Previously we thought the instance member was a function, not a field,
and we'd say something silly like:
t.cpp:4:27: error: call to non-static member function without an object argument
static int f() { return n; }
^
Noticed in PR21923.
llvm-svn: 224480
There are a few cases where unqualified lookup can find C++ methods.
Unfortunately, none of them seem to have illegal access paths, so I
can't excercise the diagnostic source range code that I am changing
here.
Fixes PR21851, which was a crash on valid.
llvm-svn: 224471
Francisco Lopes da Silva