Currently the lambda body indents relative to where the lambda signature is located. This instead lets the user
choose to align the lambda body relative to the parent scope that contains the lambda declaration. Thus:
someFunction([] {
lambdaBody();
});
will always have the same indentation of the body even when the lambda signature goes on a new line:
someFunction(
[] {
lambdaBody();
});
whereas before lambdaBody would be indented 6 spaces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102706
This allows to set a different indent width for preprocessor statements.
Example:
#ifdef __linux_
# define FOO
#endif
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103286
This re-applies the old patch D27651, which was never landed, into the
latest "main" branch, without understanding the code. I just applied
the changes "mechanically" and made it compiling again.
This makes the right pointer alignment working as expected.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR27353
For instance
const char* const* v1;
float const* v2;
SomeVeryLongType const& v3;
was formatted as
const char *const * v1;
float const * v2;
SomeVeryLongType const &v3;
This patch keep the *s or &s aligned to the right, next to their variable.
The above example is now formatted as
const char *const *v1;
float const *v2;
SomeVeryLongType const &v3;
It is a pity that this still does not work with clang-format in 2021,
even though there was a fix available in 2016. IMHO right pointer alignment
is the default case in C, because syntactically the pointer belongs to the
variable.
See
int* a, b, c; // wrong, just the 1st variable is a pointer
vs.
int *a, *b, *c; // right
Prominent example is the Linux kernel coding style.
Some styles argue the left pointer alignment is better and declaration
lists as shown above should be avoided. That's ok, as different projects
can use different styles, but this important style should work too.
I hope that somebody that has a better understanding about the code,
can take over this patch and land it into main.
For now I must maintain this fork to make it working for our projects.
Cheers,
Gerhard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103245
This is a re-application of dc67299 which was reverted in f63adf5b because
it broke the build. The issue should now be fixed.
Attribution note: The original author of this patch is Erik Pilkington.
I'm only trying to land it after rebasing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91630
This inheritance list style has been widely adopted by Symantec,
a division of Broadcom Inc. It breaks after the commas that
separate the base-specifiers:
class Derived : public Base1,
private Base2
{
};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103204
This patch adds support for GCC's -fstack-usage flag. With this flag, a stack
usage file (i.e., .su file) is generated for each input source file. The format
of the stack usage file is also similar to what is used by GCC. For each
function defined in the source file, a line with the following information is
produced in the .su file.
<source_file>:<line_number>:<function_name> <size_in_byte> <static/dynamic>
"Static" means that the function's frame size is static and the size info is an
accurate reflection of the frame size. While "dynamic" means the function's
frame size can only be determined at run-time because the function manipulates
the stack dynamically (e.g., due to variable size objects). The size info only
reflects the size of the fixed size frame objects in this case and therefore is
not a reliable measure of the total frame size.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100509
This fixes PR46992.
Git stores symlinks as text files and we should not format them even if
they have one of the requested extensions.
(Move the call to `cd_to_toplevel()` up a few lines so we can also print
the skipped symlinks during verbose output.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101878
Warn when a declaration uses an identifier that doesn't obey the reserved
identifier rule from C and/or C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93095
A need for such an option came up in a few libc++ reviews. That's because libc++ has both code in C++03 and newer standards.
Currently, it uses `Standard: C++03` setting for clang-format, but this breaks e.g. u8"string" literals.
Also, angle brackets are the only place where C++03-specific formatting needs to be applied.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101344
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41870.
Checks for newlines in option Style.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier are now based on the formatted new lines and not on the new lines in the file.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99503
This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
The current logic for access modifiers in classes ignores the option 'MaxEmptyLinesToKeep=1'. It is therefore impossible to have a coding style that requests one empty line after an access modifier. The patch allows the user to configure how many empty lines clang-format should add after an access modifier. This will remove lines if there are to many and will add them if there are missing.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98237
In GCC, if `-B $prefix` is specified, `$prefix` is used to find executable files and startup files.
`$prefix/include` is added as an include search directory.
Clang overloads -B with GCC installation detection semantics which make the
behavior less predictable (due to the "largest GCC version wins" rule) and
interact poorly with --gcc-toolchain (--gcc-toolchain can be overridden by -B).
* `clang++ foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under `/usr`.
* `clang++ --gcc-toolchain=Inputs foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under `Inputs`.
* `clang++ -BA --gcc-toolchain=B foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under A and B and the larger version wins. With this patch, only B is used for detection.
* `clang++ -BA foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under `A` and `/usr`, and the larger GCC version wins. With this patch `A` is not used for detection.
This patch changes -B to drop the GCC detection semantics. Its executable
searching semantics are preserved. --gcc-toolchain is the recommended option to
specify the GCC installation detection directory.
(
Note: Clang detects GCC installation in various target dependent directories.
`$sysroot/usr` (sysroot defaults to "") is a common directory used by most targets.
Such a directory is expected to contain something like `lib{,32,64}/gcc{,-cross}/$triple`.
Clang will then construct library/include paths from the directory.
)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97993
This commit removes the old way of handling Whitesmiths mode in favor of just setting the
levels during parsing and letting the formatter handle it from there. It requires a bit of
special-casing during the parsing, but ends up a bit cleaner than before. It also removes
some of switch/case unit tests that don't really make much sense when dealing with
Whitesmiths.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94500
clang-format documentation states that having enabled
FixNamespaceComments one may expect below code:
c++
namespace a {
foo();
}
to be turned into:
c++
namespace a {
foo();
} // namespace a
In reality, no "// namespace a" was added. The problem was too high
value of kShortNamespaceMaxLines, which is used while deciding whether
a namespace is long enough to be formatted.
As with 9163fe2, clang-format idempotence is preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87587
LIBCLANG_INCLUDE_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA causes clang-tools-extra tools
to be included in libclang, which caused a dependency cycle. The option
has been off by default for two releases now, and (based on a web search
and mailing list feedback) nobody seems to turn it on. Remove it, like
planned on https://reviews.llvm.org/D79599
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97693
Adds support for coding styles that make a separate indentation level for access modifiers, such as Code::Blocks or QtCreator.
The new option, `IndentAccessModifiers`, if enabled, forces the content inside classes, structs and unions (“records”) to be indented twice while removing a level for access modifiers. The value of `AccessModifierOffset` is disregarded in this case, aiming towards an ease of use.
======
The PR (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19056) had an implementation attempt by @MyDeveloperDay already (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60225) but I've decided to start from scratch. They differ in functionality, chosen approaches, and even the option name. The code tries to re-use the existing functionality to achieve this behavior, limiting possibility of breaking something else.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94661
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40858
CheckShadow is now called for each binding in the structured binding to make sure it does not shadow any other variable in scope. This does use a custom implementation of getShadowedDeclaration though because a BindingDecl is not a VarDecl
Added a few unit tests for this. In theory though all the other shadow unit tests should be duplicated for the structured binding variables too but whether it is probably not worth it as they use common code. The MyTuple and std interface code has been copied from live-bindings-test.cpp
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96147
This allows the define BasedOnStyle: InheritParentConfig and then
clang-format looks into the parent directories for their
.clang-format and takes that as a basis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93844
Adds an option to [clang-format] which sorts headers in an alphabetical manner using case only for tie-breakers. The options is off by default in favor of the current ASCIIbetical sorting style.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95017
There are two use cases.
Assembler
We have accrued some code gated on MCAsmInfo::useIntegratedAssembler(). Some
features are supported by latest GNU as, but we have to use
MCAsmInfo::useIntegratedAs() because the newer versions have not been widely
adopted (e.g. SHF_LINK_ORDER 'o' and 'unique' linkage in 2.35, --compress-debug-sections= in 2.26).
Linker
We want to use features supported only by LLD or very new GNU ld, or don't want
to work around older GNU ld. We currently can't represent that "we don't care
about old GNU ld". You can find such workarounds in a few other places, e.g.
Mips/MipsAsmprinter.cpp PowerPC/PPCTOCRegDeps.cpp X86/X86MCInstrLower.cpp
AArch64 TLS workaround for R_AARCH64_TLSLD_MOVW_DTPREL_* (PR ld/18276),
R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36727https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969)
Mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER and non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components (supported by LLD in D84001;
GNU ld feature request https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16833 may take a while before available).
This feature allows to garbage collect some unused sections (e.g. fragmented .gcc_except_table).
This patch adds `-fbinutils-version=` to clang and `-binutils-version` to llc.
It changes one codegen place in SHF_MERGE to demonstrate its usage.
`-fbinutils-version=2.35` means the produced object file does not care about GNU
ld<2.35 compatibility. When `-fno-integrated-as` is specified, the produced
assembly can be consumed by GNU as>=2.35, but older versions may not work.
`-fbinutils-version=none` means that we can use all ELF features, regardless of
GNU as/ld support.
Both clang and llc need `parseBinutilsVersion`. Such command line parsing is
usually implemented in `llvm/lib/CodeGen/CommandFlags.cpp` (LLVMCodeGen),
however, ClangCodeGen does not depend on LLVMCodeGen. So I add
`parseBinutilsVersion` to `llvm/lib/Target/TargetMachine.cpp` (LLVMTarget).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85474
Currently, empty lines and comments break alignment of assignments on consecutive
lines. This makes the AlignConsecutiveAssignments option an enum that allows controlling
whether empty lines or empty lines and comments should be ignored when aligning
assignments.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, tinloaf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93986
Currently, empty lines and comments break alignment of assignments on consecutive
lines. This makes the AlignConsecutiveAssignments option an enum that allows controlling
whether empty lines or empty lines and comments should be ignored when aligning
assignments.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, tinloaf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93986
This allows to ignore for example Qts emit when
AlignConsecutiveDeclarations is set, otherwise it is parsed as a type
and it results in some misformating:
unsigned char MyChar = 'x';
emit signal(MyChar);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93776
GCC made the switch on 2018-04-10 ("rs6000: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables by default").
In Clang, FreeBSD/NetBSD powerpc have already defaulted to -fasynchronous-unwind-tables.
This patch defaults Generic_GCC powerpc (which affects Linux) to use -fasynchronous-unwind-tables.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92054
cl.exe doesn't understand Zd (in either MSVC 2017 or 2019), so neiter
should we. It used to do the same as `-gline-tables-only` which is
exposed as clang-cl flag as well, so if you want this behavior, use
`gline-tables-only`. That makes it clear that it's a clang-cl-only flag
that won't work with cl.exe.
Motivated by the discussion in D92958.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93458
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-May/065430.html
Agreement from GCC: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545688.html
g_flags_Group options generally don't affect the amount of debugging
information. -gsplit-dwarf is an exception. Its order dependency with
other gN_Group options make it inconvenient in a build system:
* -g0 -gsplit-dwarf -> level 2
-gsplit-dwarf "upgrades" the amount of debugging information despite
the previous intention (-g0) to drop debugging information
* -g1 -gsplit-dwarf -> level 2
-gsplit-dwarf "upgrades" the amount of debugging information.
* If we have a higher-level -gN, -gN -gsplit-dwarf will supposedly decrease the
amount of debugging information. This happens with GCC -g3.
The non-orthogonality has confused many users. GCC 11 will change the semantics
(-gsplit-dwarf no longer implies -g2) despite the backwards compatibility break.
This patch matches its behavior.
New semantics:
* If there is a g_Group, allow split DWARF if useful
(none of: -g0, -gline-directives-only, -g1 -fno-split-dwarf-inlining)
* Otherwise, no-op.
To restore the original behavior, replace -gsplit-dwarf with -gsplit-dwarf -g.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80391
This is a starting point to improve the handling of concepts in clang-format. There is currently no real formatting of concepts and this can lead to some odd formatting, e.g.
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar, miscco, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79773
Update the ASTNodeTraverser to dump only nodes spelled in source. There
are only a few which need to be handled, but Decl nodes for which
isImplicit() is true are handled together.
Update the RAV instances used in ASTMatchFinder to ignore the nodes too.
As with handling of template instantiations, it is necessary to allow
the RAV to process the implicit nodes because they need to be visitable
before the first traverse() matcher is encountered. An exception to
this is in the MatchChildASTVisitor, because we sometimes wish to make a
node matchable but make its children not-matchable. This is the case
for defaulted CXXMethodDecls for example.
Extend TransformerTests to illustrate the kinds of problems that can
arise when performing source code rewriting due to matching implicit
nodes.
This change accounts for handling nodes not spelled in source when using
direct matching of nodes, and when using the has() and hasDescendant()
matchers. Other matchers such as
cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(cxxMethodDecl())) still succeed for
compiler-generated methods for example after this change. Updating the
implementations of hasMethod() and other matchers is for a follow-up
patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90982
Vitali Lovich