using new/delete and OwningPtrs. After memory profiling Clang, I witnessed periodic leaks of these
objects; digging deeper into the code, it was clear that our management of these objects was a mess. The ownership rules were murky at best, and not always followed. Worse, there are plenty of error paths where we could screw up.
This patch introduces AttributeList::Factory, which is a factory class that creates AttributeList
objects and then blows them away all at once. While conceptually simple, most of the changes in
this patch just have to do with migrating over to the new interface. Most of the changes have resulted in some nice simplifications.
This new strategy currently holds on to all AttributeList objects during the lifetime of the Parser
object. This is easily tunable. If we desire to have more bound the lifetime of AttributeList
objects more precisely, we can have the AttributeList::Factory object (in Parser) push/pop its
underlying allocator as we enter/leave key methods in the Parser. This means that we get
simple memory management while still having the ability to finely control memory use if necessary.
Note that because AttributeList objects are now BumpPtrAllocated, we may reduce malloc() traffic
in many large files with attributes.
This fixes the leak reported in: <rdar://problem/8650003>
llvm-svn: 118675
construct an unsupported friend when there's a friend with a templated
scope specifier. Fixes a consistency crash, rdar://problem/8540527
llvm-svn: 116786
with comma-separated lists. We never actually used the comma
locations, nor did we store them in the AST, but we did manage to
waste time during template instantiation to produce fake locations.
llvm-svn: 113495
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
-There are 2 instances that change the TokenID for GNU libstdc++ 4.2 compatibility.
To handler those cases introduce a RevertedTokenID bitfield, RevertTokenIDToIdentifier() and hasRevertedTokenIDToIdentifier() methods.
Store the bitfield in PCH.
llvm-svn: 110868
allows Sema some limited access to the current scope, which we only
use in one way: when Sema is performing some kind of declaration that
is not directly driven by the parser (e.g., due to template
instantiatio or lazy declaration of a member), we can find the Scope
associated with a DeclContext, if that DeclContext is still in the
process of being parsed.
Use this to make the implicit declaration of special member functions
in a C++ class more "scope-less", rather than using the NULL Scope hack.
llvm-svn: 107491
This is more targeted, as it simply provides toggle actions for the parser to
turn access checking on and off. We then use these to suppress access checking
only while we parse the template-id (included scope specifier) of an explicit
instantiation and explicit specialization of a class template. The
specialization behavior is an extension, as it seems likely a defect that the
standard did not exempt them as it does explicit instantiations.
This allows the very common practice of specializing trait classes to work for
private, internal types. This doesn't address instantiating or specializing
function templates, although those apparently already partially work.
The naming and style for the Action layer isn't my favorite, comments and
suggestions would be appreciated there.
llvm-svn: 106993
just skip over the body of the class or class template: it's a
semantic disaster that's likely to cause invariants to break. Fixes
part of <rdar://problem/8104754>.
llvm-svn: 106496
"previous token" location at the end of the class definition. This
eliminates a badly-placed error + Fix-It when the ';' following a
class definition is missing. Fixes <rdar://problem/8066414>.
llvm-svn: 106175
1) Suppress diagnostics as soon as we form the code-completion
token, so we don't get any error/warning spew from the early
end-of-file.
2) If we consume a code-completion token when we weren't expecting
one, go into a code-completion recovery path that produces the best
results it can based on the context that the parser is in.
llvm-svn: 104585
Craig Silverstein