This is a follow-up to D67448.
Split live intervals with multiple dead defs during the initial
execution of the live interval analysis, but do it outside of the
function createAndComputeVirtRegInterval.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68666
The test case used invalid source operands as input
to BTS64rr instructions (feeding register operands with
immediates). This patch changes those instruction into
using BTS64ri8 instead, which seems to better match the
operand types.
Fixes problems seen in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63973.
llvm-svn: 369866
The debug-use flag must be set exactly for uses on DBG_VALUEs. This is
so obvious that it can be trivially inferred while parsing. This will
reduce noise when printing while omitting an information that has little
value to the user.
The parser will keep recognizing the flag for compatibility with old
`.mir` files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53903
llvm-svn: 345671
The machine verifier was disabled for x86 by default. There are now only
9 tests failing, compared to what previously was between 20 and 30.
This is a good opportunity to file bugs for all the remaining issues,
then explicitly disable the failing tests and enabling the machine
verifier by default.
This allows us to avoid adding new tests that break the verifier.
PR27481
llvm-svn: 345513
Summary:
Fixes PR36579.
For cases where we had e.g.
DBG_VALUE 42
[...]
DBG_VALUE undef
LiveDebugVariables would discard all undef DBG_VALUEs and then it would
look like the variable had the value 42 throughout the rest of the
function, which is incorrect.
With this patch we don't remove all undef DBG_VALUEs in LiveDebugVariables
so they will be kept after register allocation just like other DBG_VALUEs
which will yield more correct debug information.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: bjope, Ka-Ka, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48277
llvm-svn: 335205
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Summary:
This is a workaround for pr36417
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36417
LiveDebugVariables will now verify that the DBG_VALUE instructions
are sane (prior to register allocation) by asking LIS if a virtual
register used in the DBG_VALUE is live (or dead def) in the slot
index before the DBG_VALUE. If it isn't sane the DBG_VALUE is
discarded.
One pass that was identified as introducing non-sane DBG_VALUE
instructtons, when analysing pr36417, was the DAG->DAG Instruction
Selection. It sometimes inserts DBG_VALUE instructions referring to
a virtual register that is defined later in the same basic block.
So it is a use before def kind of problem. The DBG_VALUE is
typically inserted in the beginning of a basic block when this
happens. The problem can be seen in the test case
test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-value-inlined-parameter.ll
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, probinson
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: vsk, davide, alexcrichton, Ka-Ka, eraman, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43956
llvm-svn: 326769