Summary:
All the use cases of CallAnalyzer use the same call site parameter to
both construct the CallAnalyzer, and then pass to the analysis member.
This change removes this duplication.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, Jim
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: Jim, hiraditya, haicheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71645
Summary:
It is pretty common to assume that something is not zero.
Even optimizer itself sometimes emits such assumptions
(e.g. `addAssumeNonNull()` in `PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp`).
But we currently don't deal with such assumptions :)
The only way `isKnownNonZero()` handles assumptions is
by calling `computeKnownBits()` which calls `computeKnownBitsFromAssume()`.
But `x != 0` does not tell us anything about set bits,
it only says that there are *some* set bits.
So naturally, `KnownBits` does not get populated,
and we fail to make use of this assumption.
I propose to deal with this special case by special-casing it
via adding a `isKnownNonZeroFromAssume()` that returns boolean
when there is an applicable assumption.
While there, we also deal with other predicates,
mainly if the comparison is with constant.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43267 | PR43267 ]].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71660
This is a pretty rare case, when CxtI and assume are
in the same basic block, with assume being located later.
We were already checking that assumption was guaranteed to be
executed, but we omitted CxtI itself from consideration,
and as the test (miscompile) shows, that is incorrect.
As noted in D71660 review by @nikic.
Summary:
This patch associates ordinal numbers to the DDG Nodes allowing
the builder to order nodes within a pi-block in program order. The
algorithm works by simply assuming the order in which the BBList
is fed into the builder. The builder already relies on the blocks being
in program order so that it can compute the dependencies correctly.
Similarly the order of instructions in their parent basic blocks
determine their program order.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto, ppc-slack
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70986
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
Summary:
Follow-on to D66428 and D71193, to build the TLI per-function so
that -fno-builtin* handling can be migrated to use function attributes.
See discussion on D61634 for background. This is an enabler for fixing
handling of these options for LTO, for example.
With D71193, the -fno-builtin* flags are converted to function
attributes, so we can now set this information per-function on the TLI.
In this patch, the TLI constructor is changed to take a Function, which
can be used to override the available builtins. The TLI is augmented
with an array that can be used to specify which builtins are not
available for the corresponding function. The available function checks
are changed to consult this override before checking the underlying
module level baseline TLII. New code is added to set this override
array based on the attributes.
I also removed the code that sets availability in the TLII in clang from
the options, which is no longer needed.
I removed a per-Triple caching of TLII objects in the analysis object,
as it is based on the Module's Triple which is the same for all
functions in any case. Is there a case where we would be compiling
multiple Modules with different Triples in one compilation?
Finally, I have changed the legacy analysis wrapper to create and use
the new PM analysis class (TargetLibraryAnalysis) in getTLI. This is
consistent with the behavior of getTTI for the legacy
TargetTransformInfo analysis. This change means that getTLI now creates
a new TLI on each call (although that should be very cheap as we cache
the module level TLII, and computing the per-function
attribute based availability should also be reasonably efficient).
I measured the compile time for a large C++ file with tens of thousands
of functions and as expected there was no increase.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, gchatelet
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67923
shuf (inselt ?, C, IndexC), undef, <IndexC, IndexC...> --> <C, C...>
This is another missing shuffle fold pattern uncovered by the
shuffle correctness fix from D70246.
The problem was visible in the post-commit thread example, but
we managed to overcome the limitation for that particular case
with D71220.
This is something like the inverse of the previous fix - there
we didn't demand the inserted scalar, and here we are only
demanding an inserted scalar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71488
This reverts commit 0be81968a2.
The VFDatabase needs some rework to be able to handle vectorization
and subsequent scalarization of intrinsics in out-of-tree versions of
the compiler. For more details, see the discussion in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.
This fixes the buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328
Patch by Joseph Faulls!
This is a rebase of the change over D70376, which fixes an LVI cache
invalidation issue that also affected this patch.
-----
Related to D69686. As noted there, LVI currently behaves differently
for integer and pointer values: For integers, the block value is always
valid inside the basic block, while for pointers it is only valid at
the end of the basic block. I believe the integer behavior is the
correct one, and CVP relies on it via its getConstantRange() uses.
The reason for the special pointer behavior is that LVI checks whether
a pointer is dereferenced in a given basic block and marks it as
non-null in that case. Of course, this information is valid only after
the dereferencing instruction, or in conservative approximation,
at the end of the block.
This patch changes the treatment of dereferencability: Instead of
including it inside the block value, we instead treat it as something
similar to an assume (it essentially is a non-nullness assume) and
incorporate this information in intersectAssumeOrGuardBlockValueConstantRange()
if the context instruction is the terminator of the basic block.
This happens either when determining an edge-value internally in LVI,
or when a terminator was explicitly passed to getValueAt(). The latter
case makes this change not fully NFC, because we can now fold
terminator icmps based on the dereferencability information in the
same block. This is the reason why I changed one JumpThreading test
(it would optimize the condition away without the change).
Of course, we do not want to recompute dereferencability on each
intersectAssume call, so we need a new cache for this. The
dereferencability analysis requires walking the entire basic block
and computing underlying objects of all memory operands. This was
previously done separately for each queried pointer value. In the
new implementation (both because this makes the caching simpler,
and because it is faster), I instead only walk the full BB once and
cache all the dereferenced pointers. So the traversal is now performed
only once per BB, instead of once per queried pointer value.
I think the overall model now makes more sense than before, and there
will be no more pitfalls due to differing integer/pointer behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69914
Removed code duplication in ThreadCmpOverSelect and broke it
into several smaller functions for reusing them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71158
This patch renames the LoopInfo::isRotated() method to LoopInfo::isRotatedForm()
to make it clear that the method checks whether the loop is in rotated form, not
whether the loop has been rotated by the LoopRotation pass.
In order to use assumptions, computeKnownBits needs a context
instruction. We can use the GEP, if it is an instruction. We already
pass the assumption cache, but it cannot be used without a context
instruction.
Reviewers: anemet, asbirlea, hfinkel, spatel
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71264
GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328
Patch by Joseph Faulls!
This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build of 'all'. This is 3.03% of 7,332.7MB of
object file size.
- Incremental step towards decoupling target intrinsics.
The enums are still compact, so adding and removing a single
target-specific intrinsic will trigger a rebuild of all of LLVM.
Assigning distinct target id spaces is potential future work.
Part of PR34259
Reviewers: efriedma, echristo, MaskRay
Reviewed By: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71320
Soon Intrinsic::ID will be a plain integer, so this overload will not be
possible.
Rename both overloads to ensure that downstream targets observe this as
a build failure instead of a runtime failure.
Split off from D71320
Reviewers: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71381
If the pointer was loaded/stored before the null check, the check
is redundant and can be removed. For now the optimizers do not
remove the nullptr check, see https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/H2r5GG.
The patch allows to use more nonnull constraints. Also, it found
one more optimization in some PowerPC test. This is my first llvm
review, I am free to any comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71177
Summary:
The current da printer shows the dependence without indicating
which instructions are being considered as the src vs dst. It
also silently ignores call instructions, despite the fact that
they create confused dependence edges to other memory
instructions. This patch addresses these two issues plus a
couple of minor non-functional improvements.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: dmgreen, fhahn, philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dmgreen, fhahn
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71088
Summary:
This patch adds a method to determine if a loop is in rotated form (the latch is
an exiting block). It also modifies the getLoopGuardBranch method to use this
new method. This method can also be used in Loopfusion. Once this patch lands I
will make the corresponding changes there.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney, fhahn, hfinkel
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65958
This patch introduced the VFDatabase, the framework proposed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-June/133484.html. [*]
In this patch the VFDatabase is used to bridge the TargetLibraryInfo
(TLI) calls that were previously used to query for the availability of
vector counterparts of scalar functions.
The VFISAKind field `ISA` of VFShape have been moved into into VFInfo,
under the assumption that different vector ISAs may provide the same
vector signature. At the moment, the vectorizer accepts any of the
available ISAs as long as the signature provided by the VFDatabase
matches the one expected in the vectorization process. For example,
when targeting AVX or AVX2, which both have 256-bit registers, the IR
signature of the two vector functions associated to the two ISAs is
the same. The `getVectorizedFunction` method at the moment returns the
first available match. We will need to add more heuristics to the
search system to decide which of the available version (TLI, AVX,
AVX2, ...) the system should prefer, when multiple versions with the
same VFShape are present.
Some of the code in this patch is based on the work done by Sumedh
Arani in https://reviews.llvm.org/D66025.
[*] Notice that in the proposal the VFDatabase was called SVFS. The
name VFDatabase is more in line with LLVM recommendations for
naming classes and variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572
Summary:
Same as D60846 and D69571 but with a fix for the problem encountered
after them. Both times it was a missing context adjustment in the
handling of PHI nodes.
The reproducers created from the bugs that caused the old commits to be
reverted are included.
Reviewers: nikic, nlopes, mkazantsev, spatel, dlrobertson, uabelho, hakzsam, hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71181
This attempts to teach the cost model in Arm that code such as:
%s = shl i32 %a, 3
%a = and i32 %s, %b
Can under Arm or Thumb2 become:
and r0, r1, r2, lsl #3
So the cost of the shift can essentially be free. To do this without
trying to artificially adjust the cost of the "and" instruction, it
needs to get the users of the shl and check if they are a type of
instruction that the shift can be folded into. And so it needs to have
access to the actual instruction in getArithmeticInstrCost, which if
available is added as an extra parameter much like getCastInstrCost.
We otherwise limit it to shifts with a single user, which should
hopefully handle most of the cases. The list of instruction that the
shift can be folded into include ADC, ADD, AND, BIC, CMP, EOR, MVN, ORR,
ORN, RSB, SBC and SUB. This translates to Add, Sub, And, Or, Xor and
ICmp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70966
This is another transform suggested in PR44153:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44153
The backend for some targets already manages to get
this if it converts copysign to bitwise logic.
Summary:
This patch introduces an API to build and modify vector shapes.
The validity of a VFShape can be checked with the
`hasValidParameterList` method, which is also run in an assertion each
time a VFShape is modified.
The field VFISAKind has been moved to VFInfo under the assumption that
different ISAs can map to the same VFShape (as it can be in the case
of vector extensions with the same registers size, for example AVX and
AVX2).
Reviewers: sdesmalen, jdoerfert, simoll, hsaito
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70513
Variant on D70103. The caching is switched to always use a BB to
cache entry map, which then contains per-value caches. A separate
set contains value handles with a deletion callback. This allows us
to properly invalidate overdefined values.
A possible alternative would be to always cache by value first and
have per-BB maps/sets in the each cache entry. In that case we could
use a ValueMap and would avoid the separate value handle set. I went
with the BB indexing at the top level to make it easier to integrate
D69914, but possibly that's not the right choice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70376
As it can be seen from accompanying cleanup, it is not unheard of
to write `~Known.Zero` meaning "what maximal value can this KnownBits
produce". But i think `~Known.Zero` isn't *that* self-explanatory,
as compared to a method with a name.
Note that not all `~Known.Zero` places were cleaned up,
only those where this arguably improves things.
Summary:
This fixes the memory leak in bec37c3fc7
and re-delivers the reverted patch.
In this patch the DDG DAG is sorted topologically to put the
nodes in the graph in the order that would satisfy all
dependencies. This helps transformations that would like to
generate code based on the DDG. Since the DDG is a DAG a
reverse-post-order traversal would give us the topological
ordering. This patch also sorts the basic blocks passed to
the builder based on program order to ensure that the
dependencies are computed in the correct direction.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto, ppc-slack
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70609
Summary: b19ec1eb3d has been reverted because of the test failures
with PowerPC targets. This patch addresses the issues from the previous
commit.
Test Plan: ninja check-all. Confirmed that CodeGen/PowerPC/pr36292.ll
and CodeGen/PowerPC/sms-cpy-1.ll pass
Subscribers: llvm-commits
New pass manager doesn't use verifyAnalysis, so currently there is no
way to call SCEV verification from command line when new PM is used.
This patch adds a pass that allows you to do that.
Reviewers: reames, fhahn, sanjoy.google, nikic
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70423
Currently every time we encounter an indirect call of a known function,
we try to evaluate the inline cost of that function. In case of a
recursion, that evaluation never stops.
The solution I propose is to evaluate only the indirect call of the
function, while any further indirect calls (of a known function) will be
treated just as direct function calls, which, actually, never tries to
evaluate the call.
Fixes PR35469.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69349
Summary:
While updatePostDominatedByUnreachable attemps to find basic blocks that are post-domianted by unreachable blocks, it currently cannot handle loops precisely, because it doesn't use the actual post dominator tree analysis but relies on heuristics of visiting basic blocks in post-order. More precisely, when the entire loop is post-dominated by the unreachable block, current algorithm fails to detect the entire loop as post-dominated by the unreachable because when the algorithm reaches to the loop latch it fails to tell all its successors (including the loop header) will "eventually" be post-domianted by the unreachable block, because the algorithm hasn't visited the loop header yet. This makes BPI for the loop latch to assume that loop backedges are taken with 100% of probability. And because of this, block frequency info sometimes marks virtually dead loops (which are post dominated by unreachable blocks) super hot, because 100% backedge-taken probability makes the loop iteration count the max value. updatePostDominatedByColdCall has the exact same problem as well.
To address this problem, this patch makes PostDominatedByUnreachable/PostDominatedByColdCall to be computed with the actual post-dominator tree.
Reviewers: skatkov, chandlerc, manmanren
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: manmanren, vsk, apilipenko, Carrot, qcolombet, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70104
This is correct for any value including NaN/inf.
We don't have this fold directly in the backend either,
but x86 manages to get it after converting things to bitops.
Summary:
Combine three verification methods into one to improve compile time when asserts are enabled.
Motivated by PR44066.
Sample change of timings on testcase in PR44066 (release+asserts):
MSSA off or verification disabled: 1.13s.
MSSA on (ToT): 2.48s.
With patch: 2.03s.
With enabling DefUses after combining Domination+Ordering: 2.6s.
After also combining DefUses with Domination+Ordering: 2.06s (candidate to be taken out of EXPENSIVE_CHECKS).
Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, george.burgess.iv, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70618
Summary:
In this patch the DDG DAG is sorted topologically to put the
nodes in the graph in the order that would satisfy all
dependencies. This helps transformations that would like to
generate code based on the DDG. Since the DDG is a DAG a
reverse-post-order traversal would give us the topological
ordering. This patch also sorts the basic blocks passed to
the builder based on program order to ensure that the
dependencies are computed in the correct direction.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto, ppc-slack
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70609
This version contains 2 fixes for reported issues:
1. Make sure we do not try to sink terminator instructions.
2. Make sure we bail out, if we try to sink an instruction that needs to
stay in place for another recurrence.
Original message:
If the recurrence PHI node has a single user, we can sink any
instruction without side effects, given that all users are dominated by
the instruction computing the incoming value of the next iteration
('Previous'). We can sink instructions that may cause traps, because
that only causes the trap to occur later, but not on any new paths.
With the relaxed check, we also have to make sure that we do not have a
direct cycle (meaning PHI user == 'Previous), which indicates a
reduction relation, which potentially gets missed by
ReductionDescriptor.
As follow-ups, we can also sink stores, iff they do not alias with
other instructions we move them across and we could also support sinking
chains of instructions and multiple users of the PHI.
Fixes PR43398.
Reviewers: hsaito, dcaballe, Ayal, rengolin
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69228
Currently every time we encounter an indirect call of a known function,
we try to evaluate the inline cost of that function. In case of a
recursion, that evaluation never stops.
The solution presented is to evaluate only the indirect call of the
function, while any further indirect calls (of a known function) will be
treated just as direct function calls, which, actually, never tries to
evaluate the call.
Fixes PR35469.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69349
Remove redundant map searches.
For example, every call to "operator[]" is actually translated to a
"find" call, and 2 consecutive calls to the operator, without changing
the map in-between, is just redundant, and inefficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69337
moved before another instruction.
Summary:Added an API to check if an instruction can be safely moved
before another instruction. In future PRs, we will like to add support
of moving instructions between blocks that are not control flow
equivalent, and add other APIs to enhance usability, e.g. moving basic
blocks, moving list of instructions...
Loop Fusion will be its first user. When there is intervening code in
between two loops, fusion is currently unable to fuse them. Loop Fusion
can use this utility to check if the intervening code can be safely
moved before or after the two loops, and move them, then it can
successfully fuse them.
Reviewer:kbarton,jdoerfert,Meinersbur,bmahjour,etiotto
Reviewed By:bmahjour
Subscribers:mgorny,hiraditya,llvm-commits
Tag:LLVM
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D70049
Jordan Rupprecht