When an interfering live range ends at a dead slot index between two
instructions, make sure that the inserted copy instruction gets a slot index
after the dead ones. This makes it possible to avoid the interference.
Ideally, there shouldn't be interference ending at a deleted instruction, but
physical register coalescing can sometimes do that to sub-registers.
This fixes PR9823.
llvm-svn: 130687
When DCE clones a live range because it separates into connected components,
make sure that the clones enter the same register allocator stage as the
register they were cloned from.
For instance, clones may be split even when they where created during spilling.
Other registers created during spilling are not candidates for splitting or even
(re-)spilling.
llvm-svn: 128524
The instruction to be rematerialized may not be the one defining the register
that is being spilled. The traceSiblingValue() function sees through sibling
copies to find the remat candidate.
llvm-svn: 128449
The main register class may have been inflated by live range splitting, so that
register class is not necessarily valid for the snippet instructions.
Use the original register class for the stack slot interval.
llvm-svn: 128351
I have convinced myself that it can only happen when a phi value dies. When it
happens, allocate new virtual registers for the components.
llvm-svn: 127827
LiveRangeEdit::eliminateDeadDefs() will eventually be used by coalescing,
splitting, and spilling for dead code elimination. It can delete chains of dead
instructions as long as there are no dependency loops.
llvm-svn: 127287
Values that map to a single new value in a new interval after splitting don't
need new PHIDefs, and if the parent value was never rematerialized the live
range will be the same.
llvm-svn: 126894
The greedy register allocator revealed some problems with the value mapping in
SplitKit. We would sometimes start mapping values before all defs were known,
and that could change a value from a simple 1-1 mapping to a multi-def mapping
that requires ssa update.
The new approach collects all defs and register assignments first without
filling in any live intervals. Only when finish() is called, do we compute
liveness and mapped values. At this time we know with certainty which values map
to multiple values in a split range.
This also has the advantage that we can compute live ranges based on the
remaining uses after rematerializing at split points.
The current implementation has many opportunities for compile time optimization.
llvm-svn: 124765
use before rematerializing the load.
This allows us to produce:
addps LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm2
Instead of:
movaps LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm3
addps %xmm3, %xmm2
Saving a register and an instruction. The standard spiller already knows how to
do this.
llvm-svn: 122133
the remainder register.
Example:
bb0:
x = 1
bb1:
use(x)
...
x = 2
jump bb1
When x is isolated in bb1, the inner part breaks into two components, x1 and x2:
bb0:
x0 = 1
bb1:
x1 = x0
use(x1)
...
x2 = 2
x0 = x2
jump bb1
llvm-svn: 117408
All registers created during splitting or spilling are assigned to the same
stack slot as the parent register.
When splitting or rematting, we may not spill at all. In that case the stack
slot is still assigned, but it will be dead.
llvm-svn: 116546
splitting or spillling, and to help with rematerialization.
Use LiveRangeEdit in InlineSpiller and SplitKit. This will eventually make it
possible to share remat code between InlineSpiller and SplitKit.
llvm-svn: 116543
Jakob Stoklund Olesen