When a preamble ends in a conditional preprocessor block that is being
skipped, the preprocessor needs to continue skipping that block when
the preamble is used.
This fixes PR34570.
llvm-svn: 317308
for instantiating its definition.
We model the 'inline'ness as being instantiated with the static data member in
order to track whether the declaration has become a definition yet.
llvm-svn: 317147
This feature is not (yet) approved by the C++ committee, so this is liable to
be reverted or significantly modified based on committee feedback.
No functionality change intended for existing code (a new type must be defined
in namespace std to take advantage of this feature).
llvm-svn: 315662
This patch relates to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666 This adds support
for template parameters to be passed to the address_space attribute.
The main goal is to add further flexibility to the attribute and allow
for it to be used easily with templates.
The main additions are a new type (DependentAddressSpaceType) alongside
its TypeLoc and its mangling. As well as the logic required to support
dependent address spaces which mainly resides in TreeTransform.h and
SemaType.cpp.
llvm-svn: 314649
Introduce a new "export_as" directive for top-level modules, which
indicates that the current module is a "private" module whose symbols
will eventually be exported through the named "public" module. This is
in support of a common pattern in the Darwin ecosystem where a single
public framework is constructed of several private frameworks, with
(currently) header duplication and some support from the linker.
Addresses rdar://problem/34438420.
llvm-svn: 313316
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312220
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312105
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
I will also directly update some extra clang tooling that is broken by the change from Argument to Parameter.
Hopefully the bots will stay appeased.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308190
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308157
These cases occur frequently for declarations in the global module (above the
module-declaration) in a Modules TS module interface. When we merge a
definition from another module into such a module-private definition, ensure
that we transitively make everything lexically within that definition visible
to that translation unit.
llvm-svn: 307129
This patch adds support for a `header` declaration in a module map to specify
certain `stat` information (currently, size and mtime) about that header file.
This has two purposes:
- It removes the need to eagerly `stat` every file referenced by a module map.
Instead, we track a list of unresolved header files with each size / mtime
(actually, for simplicity, we track submodules with such headers), and when
attempting to look up a header file based on a `FileEntry`, we check if there
are any unresolved header directives with that `FileEntry`'s size / mtime and
perform deferred `stat`s if so.
- It permits a preprocessed module to be compiled without the original files
being present on disk. The only reason we used to need those files was to get
the `stat` information in order to do header -> module lookups when using the
module. If we're provided with the `stat` information in the preprocessed
module, we can avoid requiring the files to exist.
Unlike most `header` directives, if a `header` directive with `stat`
information has no corresponding on-disk file the enclosing module is *not*
marked unavailable (so that behavior is consistent regardless of whether we've
resolved a header directive, and so that preprocessed modules don't get marked
unavailable). We could actually do this for all `header` directives: the only
reason we mark the module unavailable if headers are missing is to give a
diagnostic slightly earlier (rather than waiting until we actually try to build
the module / load and validate its .pcm file).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33703
llvm-svn: 304515
to the original module map.
Also use the path and name of the original module map when emitting that
information into the .pcm file. The upshot of this is that the produced .pcm
file will track information for headers in their original locations (where the
module was preprocessed), not relative to whatever directory the preprocessed
module map was in when it was built.
llvm-svn: 304346
Previously, a preamble only included #if blocks (and friends like
ifdef) if there was a corresponding #endif before any declaration or
definition. The problem is that any header file that uses include guards
will not have a preamble generated, which can make code-completion very
slow.
To prevent errors about unbalanced preprocessor conditionals in the
preamble, and unbalanced preprocessor conditionals after a preamble
containing unfinished conditionals, the conditional stack is stored
in the pch file.
This fixes PR26045.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15994
llvm-svn: 304207
inferring based on the current module at the point of creation.
This should result in no functional change except when building a preprocessed
module (or more generally when using #pragma clang module begin/end to switch
module in the middle of a file), in which case it allows us to correctly track
the owning module for declarations. We can't map from FileID to module in the
preprocessed module case, since all modules would have the same FileID.
There are still a couple of remaining places that try to infer a module from a
source location; I'll clean those up in follow-up changes.
llvm-svn: 303322
I think this is a false positive in GCC's warning, but nonetheless, we
should try to be warning-free. Smaller reproducer (reproduces with GCC
6.3):
https://godbolt.org/g/cJuO2z
llvm-svn: 302003
The intent for an explicit module build is that the diagnostics produced within
the module are those that were configured when the module was built, not those
that are enabled within a user of the module. This includes diagnostics that
don't actually show up until the module is used (for instance, diagnostics
produced during template instantiation and weird cases like -Wpadded).
We serialized and restored the diagnostic state for individual warning groups,
but previously did not track the state for flags like -Werror and -Weverything,
which are implemented as separate bits rather than as part of the diagnostics
mapping information.
llvm-svn: 301992
The modules side of r299226, which serializes #pragma pack state,
doesn't work well.
The main purpose was to make -include and -include-pch match semantics
(the PCH side). We also started serializing #pragma pack in PCMs, in
the hopes of making modules and non-modules builds more consistent. But
consider:
$ cat a.h
$ cat b.h
#pragma pack(push, 2)
$ cat module.modulemap
module M {
module a { header "a.h" }
module b { header "b.h" }
}
$ cat t.cpp
#include "a.h"
#pragma pack(show)
As of r299226, the #pragma pack(show) gives "2", even though we've only
included "a.h".
- With -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility, this is clearly wrong. We
should get the default state (8 on x86_64).
- Without -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility, this kind of matches how
other things work (as if include-the-whole-module), but it's still
really terrible, and it doesn't actually make modules and non-modules
builds more consistent.
This commit disables the serialization for modules, essentially a
partial revert of r299226.
Going forward:
1. Having this #pragma pack stuff escape is terrible design (or, more
often, a horrible bug). We should prioritize adding warnings (maybe
-Werror by default?).
2. If we eventually reintroduce this for modules, it should only apply
to -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility, and it should be tracked on
a per-submodule basis.
llvm-svn: 300380
This allows using and testing these two features separately. (noteably,
debug info is, so far as I know, always a win (basically). But function
modular codegen is currently a loss for highly optimized code - where
most of the linkonce_odr definitions are optimized away, so providing
weak_odr definitions is only overhead)
llvm-svn: 300104
r293123 started serializing diagnostic pragma state for modules. This
makes the serialization work properly for implicit modules.
An implicit module build (using Clang's internal build system) uses the
same PCM file location for different `-Werror` levels.
E.g., if a TU has `-Werror=format` and tries to load a PCM built without
`-Werror=format`, a new PCM will be built in its place (and the new PCM
should have the same signature, since r297655). In the other direction,
if a TU does not have `-Werror=format` and tries to load a PCM built
with `-Werror=format`, it should "just work".
The idea is to evolve the PCM toward the strictest -Werror flags that
anyone tries.
r293123 started serializing the diagnostic pragma state for each PCM.
Since this encodes the -Werror settings at module-build time, it breaks
the implicit build model.
This commit filters the diagnostic state in order to simulate the
current compilation's diagnostic settings. Firstly, it ignores the
module's serialized first diagnostic state, replacing it with the state
from this compilation's command-line. Secondly, if a pragma warning was
upgraded to error/fatal when generating the PCM (e.g., due to `-Werror`
on the command-line), it checks whether it should still be upgraded in
its current context.
llvm-svn: 300025
Emit the final diagnostic state last to match source order. This also
prepares for a follow-up commit for implicit modules.
There's no real functionaliy change, just a slightly different AST file
format.
llvm-svn: 300024
Calculating the hash in Sema::ActOnTagFinishDefinition could happen before
all sub-Decls were parsed or processed, which would produce the wrong hash
value. Change to calculating the hash on the first use and storing the value
instead. Also, avoid using the macros that were only for Boolean fields and
use an explicit checker during the DefintionData merge. No functional change,
but was this blocking other ODRHash patches.
llvm-svn: 299989
Matching the function-homing support for modular codegen. Any type
implicitly (implicit template specializations) or explicitly defined in
a module is attached to that module's object file and omitted elsewhere
(only a declaration used if necessary for references).
llvm-svn: 299987
Some decls are created not where they are written, but in other module
files/users (implicit special members and function template implicit
specializations). To correctly identify them, use a bit next to the definition
to track the modular codegen property.
Discussed whether the module file bit could be omitted in favor of
reconstituting from the modular codegen decls list - best guess today is that
the efficiency improvement of not having to deserialize the whole list whenever
any function is queried by a module user is worth it for the small size
increase of this redundant (list + bit-on-def) representation.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29901
llvm-svn: 299982
This patch serializes the state of #pragma pack. It preserves the state of the
pragma from a PCH/from modules in a file that uses that PCH/those modules.
rdar://21359084
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31241
llvm-svn: 299226
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
llvm-svn: 298877
Eugene Zelenko